Assessing research impact in academic clinical medicine: A study using Research Excellence Framework pilot impact indicators

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Ovseiko, Pavel V ^a   Oancea, Alis ^a   Buchan, Alastair M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL MEDICINE; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; RESEARCH; SOCIAL CHANGE; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

CLINICAL MEDICINE; FEMALE; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; RESEARCH; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; SOCIAL CHANGE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873047832     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-478     Document Type: Review

References (157)

1. Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS), International comparative performance of the UK research base 2009 London: BIS 2009
2. How has healthcare research performance been assessed? a systematic review. Patel VM, Ashrafian H, Ahmed K, et al. J Roy Soc Med 2011 104 6 251 261 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110005 21659400
3. Measuring academic performance for healthcare researchers with the h index: which search tool should be used? Patel VM, Ashrafian H, Almoudaris A, et al. Med Princ Pract 2012 [Epub ahead of print] http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/ 000341756
4. Measuring the social impact of research. Smith R, BMJ 2001 323 7312 528 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.528 11546684
5. Estimating the economic value to societies of the impact of health research: a critical review. Buxton M, Hanney S, Jones T, B World Health Organ 2004 82 10 733 739 (Pubitemid 39457822)
6. Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework. Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Pleasant A, et al. BMC Health Serv Res 2006 6 134 10.1186/1472-6963-6-134 17049092 (Pubitemid 44713625)
7. Describing the impact of health services and policy research. Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Walt G, J Health Serv Res Policy 2007 12 Suppl 1 23 31
8. Warry P, Increasing the economic impact of research councils: advice to the Director General of Science and Innovation London: DTI from the Research Council Economic Impact Group 2006
9. Wooding S, Nason E, Starkey T, et al. Mapping the impact: exploring the payback of arthritis research Cambridge: RAND Europe 2009
10. Government seeks more impact from its research investment. Iddon B, Future Med Chem 2009 1 3 427 430 10.4155/fmc.09.44 21426123
11. Beyond the impact factor. Watts G, BMJ 2009 338 553 10.1136/bmj.b553 19218319
12. Grant J, Brutscher P-B, Kirk S, et al. Capturing research impacts: a review of international practice. Prepared for the Higher Education Funding Council for England Cambridge: RAND Europe 2009
13. Research and how to promote it in a university. Allen JF, Future Med Chem 2010 2 1 15 20 10.4155/fmc.09.150 21426042
14. An evaluation of the Mind Body Interactions and Health Program: assessing the impact of an NIH program using the Payback Framework. Scott JE, Blasinsky M, Dufour M, et al. Res Evaluat 2011 20 3 185 192 10.3152/ 095820211X12941371876661
15. Evaluating health research funding in Ireland: assessing the impacts of the Health Research Board of Ireland's funding activities. Nason E, Curran B, Hanney S, et al. Res Evaluat 2011 20 3 193 200 10.3152/095820211X12941371876823
16. Panel on Return on Investment in Health Research, Making an impact: a preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research Ottawa, ON: Canadian Academy of Health Sciences 2009
17. Health research: measuring the social, health and economic benefits. Frank C, Nason E, CMAJ 2009 180 5 528 534 19164482
18. Measuring the impact of medical research: moving from outputs to outcomes. Weiss AP, Am J Psychiat 2007 164 2 206 214 10.1176/appi.ajp.164.2.206 17267781
19. Perspective: key indicators in academic medicine: a suggested framework for analysis. Joiner KA, Coleman DL, Acad Med 2012 87 2 230 235 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823faafb 22273616
20. Boelen C, Heck JE, Defining and measuring the social accountability of medical schools Geneva: World Health Organization 1995
21. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Lancet 2010 376 9756 1923 1958 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5 21112623
22. Awases M, Bailey R, Boelen C, et al. Global Consensus for Social Accountability of Medical Schools 2010 [ http://healthsocialaccountability.org ]
23. Seeking impact of medical schools on health: meeting the challenges of social accountability. Woollard B, Boelen C, Med Educ 2012 46 1 21 27 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04081.x 22150193
24. Evaluating the outcomes of biomedical research on healthcare. Grant J, Res Evaluat 1999 8 1 33 38 10.3152/147154499781777658
25. Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's 'Arthritis Research Campaign'. Hanney SR, Grant J, Wooding S, et al. Health Res Policy Syst 2004 2 1 4 10.1186/1478-4505-2-4 15272939 (Pubitemid 40629447)
26. Evaluating «payback» on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study. Grant J, Cottrell R, Cluzeau F, et al. BMJ 2000 320 7242 1107 1111 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1107 10775218 (Pubitemid 30213967)
27. European Council, Presidency conclusions-Lisbon European Council, 23-24 March 2000 Lisbon: European Council 2000 23162359
28. European Commission, Working together for growth and jobs: a new start for the lisbon strategy, COM(2005) 24 Brussels: European Commission 2005
29. European Commission, Assessing Europe's university-based research: expert group on assessment of university-based research Brussels: European Commission 2010 23343878
30. Department of Health, Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy London: Department of Health 2006
31. A novel performance monitoring framework for health research systems: experiences of the National Institute for Health Research in England. El Turabi A, Hallsworth M, Ling T, et al. Health Res Policy Syst 2011 9 13 10.1186/1478-4505-9-13 21435265
32. Performance-based university research funding systems. Hicks D, Res Policy 2012 41 2 251 261 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
33. Research quality assessment in education: impossible science, possible art? Bridges D, Brit Educ Res J 2009 35 4 497 517 10.1080/01411920903111565
34. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), Assessment framework and guidance on submissions London: HEFCE 2011
35. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), Decisions on assessing research impact London: HEFCE 2011
36. 'Impact' in the proposals for the UK's Research Excellence Framework: shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy. Smith S, Ward V, House A, Res Policy 2011 40 10 1369 1379 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.026
37. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), REF impact pilot exercise: guidance on submissions; 19 November 2009 London: HEFCE 2009
38. Technopolis Group, REF research impact pilot exercise lessons-learned project: feedback on pilot submissions; final report Brighton: Technopolis Ltd 2010
39. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), Research Excellence Framework consultation outcomes. Annex A-initial decisions on the Research Excellence Framework; circular letter No. 04/2010 London: HEFCE 2010
40. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), Panel criteria and working methods London: HEFCE 2012
41. The United Kingdom's RAE: impact on institutions, departments, individuals. Hare PG, High Educ Manag Pol 2003 15 43 61
42. The impact of research selectivity on academic work and identity in UK universities. Harley S, Stud High Educ 2002 27 2 187 205 10.1080/ 03075070220119986b
43. Lucas L, The research game in academic life Maidenhead: Open University Press 2006
44. Oancea A, Research assessment in the United Kingdom: issues of concern. In: International Social Science Council (2010) World Social Science Report Paris: UNESCO 2010
45. Oancea A, The BERA/UCET review of the impacts of RAE 2008 on education research in UK higher education institutions Macclesfield: UCET/BERA 2010
46. How can payback from health research be assessed? Buxton M, Hanney S, J Health Serv Res Policy 1996 1 1 35 43 10180843
47. Nutley SM, Percy-Smith J, Solesbury W, Models of research impact: a cross-sector review of literature and practice London: LSDA 2003
48. State of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issue. Donovan C, Res Evaluat 2011 20 3 175 179 10.3152/095820211X13118583635918
49. The payback of 'payback': challenges in assessing research impact. Buxton M, Res Evaluat 2011 20 3 259 260 10.3152/095820211X13118583635837
50. The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? Martin BR, Res Evaluat 2011 20 3 247 254 10.3152/095820211X13118583635693
51. Measuring the societal impact of research. Bornmann L, EMBO Rep 2012 13 8 673 676 10.1038/embor.2012.99 22777497
52. Higher Education Information Database for Institutions (heidi), 2004/05-2008/09 finance return: research grants & contracts-breakdown of income by cost centre, item 01 clinical medicine [ https://heidi.hesa.ac.uk/ ]
53. Organizational culture in an academic health center: an exploratory study using a Competing Values Framework. Ovseiko PV, Buchan AM, Acad Med 2012 87 6 709 718 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182537983 22534590
54. Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review. VanGeest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL, Eval Health Prof 2007 30 4 303 321 10.1177/0163278707307899 17986667
55. Academy of Medical Sciences, Careers for biomedical scientists and clinicians in industry London: Academy of Medical Sciences 2007
56. European Commission, Mobility of researchers between academia and industry; 12 practical recommendations Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2006 23122689
57. Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC), Promoting better public-private partnerships/industry-university relations Paris: BIAC 2003
58. HM Treasury, Lambert review of business-university collaboration: final report Norwich: HMSO 2003
59. Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Dietz JS, Bozeman B, Res Policy 2005 34 3 349 367 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008 (Pubitemid 40612711)
60. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Lee S, Bozeman B, Soc Stud Sci 2005 35 5 673 702 10.1177/0306312705052359 (Pubitemid 41495323)
61. European Commission, Creating an innovative Europe: report of the independent expert group on R&D and innovation appointed following the Hampton Court Summit and chaired by Mr. Esko Aho Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2006
62. Thrift N, Research careers in the UK: a review London: BIS 2008
63. Mellors-Bourne R, Metcalfe J, Careers in Research Online Survey (CROS) 2011. Analysis of UK aggregate results Cambridge: Vitae, Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited 2011
64. HM Treasury, SET for success: the supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. The report of Sir Gareth Roberts' review London: HM Treasury 2002
65. Oliver L, Hooley T, Researchers, fixed-term contracts and universities: understanding law in context Cambridge: Vitae, Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited 2010
66. Postdoctoral patterns, career advancement, and problems. Nerad M, Cerny J, Science 1999 285 5433 1533 1535 10.1126/science.285.5433.1533 10477510 (Pubitemid 29420570)
67. From apprentice to colleague: the metamorphosis of early career researchers. Laudel G, Glaser J, High Educ 2008 55 3 387 406 10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7
68. Postdoctoral researchers: roles, functions and career prospects. Åkerlind GS, High Educ Res Dev 2005 24 1 21 40 10.1080/0729436052000318550 (Pubitemid 40262797)
69. Postdoctoral research positions as preparation for an academic career. Åkerlind GS, Int J Res Dev 2009 1 1 84 96
70. Obstacles facing translational research in academic medical centers. Pober JS, Neuhauser CS, Pober JM, FASEB J 2001 15 13 2303 2313 10.1096/fj.01-0540lsf 11689456 (Pubitemid 33063159)
71. Science careers. Carving a career in translational research. Carpenter S, Science 2007 317 5840 966 967 10.1126/science.317.5840.966 17702947
72. Science careers. European programs offer translational training. Pain E, Science 2007 317 5840 968 969 17702949
73. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), NIHR Integrated Academic Training Programme [ http://www.nihrtcc.nhs.uk/intetacatrain/ ]
74. Cooksey D, A review of UK health research funding London: HM Treasury 2006
75. Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Gulbrandsen M, Smeby JC, Res Policy 2005 34 6 932 950 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05. 004 (Pubitemid 41078309)
76. Banal-Estanol A, Jofre-Bonet M, Meissner C, The impact of industry collaboration on research: evidence from engineering academics in the UK Universitat Pompeu Fabra: Economics Working Papers. Department of Economics and Business 2010
77. Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovations. Sternitzke C, Res Policy 2010 39 6 810 821 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.001
78. Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Mansfield E, Res Policy 1998 26 7-8 773 776 (Pubitemid 128394436)
79. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Narin F, Hamilton KS, Olivastro D, Res Policy 1997 26 3 317 330 10.1016/S0048-7333(97) 00013-9 (Pubitemid 127382138)
80. Traces of prior art: an analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Callaert J, Van Looy B, Verbeek A, et al. Scientometrics 2006 69 1 3 20 10.1007/s11192-006-0135-8 (Pubitemid 44389311)
81. Using bibliometrics to support the procurement of NIHR biomedical research centres in England. van Leeuwen T, Hoorens S, Grant J, Res Evaluat 2009 18 1 71 82 10.3152/095820209X414178
82. Does university-industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Hicks D, Hamilton K, Issues Sci Technol 1999 15 4 74 75
83. The effect of university-industry collaboration on the scientific impact of publications: the Canadian case, 1980-2005. Lebeau LM, Laframboise MC, Lariviere V, et al. Res Evaluat 2008 17 3 227 232 10.3152/095820208X331685
84. University-industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination. Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Di Costa F, et al. Technovation 2009 29 6-7 498 507
85. Collaboration uncovered: exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Lundberg J, Tomson G, Lundkvist I, et al. Scientometrics 2006 69 3 575 589 10.1007/s11192-006-0170-5
86. What do we measure by co-authorships? Laudel G, Res Evaluat 2002 11 1 3 15 10.3152/147154402781776961
87. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C, et al. Res Policy 2000 29 2 313 330 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
88. Tang P, Exploiting university intellectual property in the UK. A report prepared for the UKIPO London: Intellectual Property Institute 2008
89. HM Treasury, Innovating for the future: investing in R&D; a consultation document London: HM Treasury 1998
90. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Competing in the global economy: the innovation challenge. Innovation report London: DTI 2003
91. HM Treasury, Science and innovation investment framework 2004-2014: next steps London: The Stationery Office 2006 17129334
92. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), Evaluation of the effectiveness and role of HEFCE/OSI third stream funding Cambridge: HEFCE 2009
93. Nelsen L, Technology transfer at MIT Massachusetts: Cambridge The Brazil-MIT Forum/Conferência Brasil-MIT. 2011
94. Measuring the performance of Oxford University, Oxford Brookes University and the government laboratories' spin-off companies. Lawton-Smith H, Ho K, Res Policy 2006 35 10 1554 1568 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.022 (Pubitemid 44792242)
95. Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Lockett A, Wright M, Res Policy 2005 34 7 1043 1057 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006 (Pubitemid 41260501)
96. Crocker G, Opportunity: UK life science start-up report 2010 Nottingham: Mobius Life Sciences Fund & BioCity 2010
97. Isis Innovations Ltd, PowderJect Pharmaceuticals plc-part of Novartis AG [ http://www.isis-innovation.com/spinout/powderject.html ] 10547421
98. Oxford Spin-out Equity Management (OSEM), Portfolio [ http://www.osem.ox.ac.uk/portfolio/index.html ]
99. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Henderson R, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Rev Econ Stat 1998 80 1 119 127 10.1162/003465398557221
100. Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole Act: a re-examination. Sampat BN, Mowery DC, Ziedonis AA, Int J Ind Organ 2003 21 9 1371 1390 10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00087-0
101. Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Mowery DC, Ziedonis AA, Res Policy 2002 31 3 399 418 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00116-0
102. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Heller MA, Eisenberg RS, Science 1998 280 5364 698 701 10.1126/science.280.5364. 698 9563938 (Pubitemid 28243336)
103. Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic-industrial relations and intellectual property. Rappert B, Webster A, Charles D, Res Policy 1999 28 8 873 890 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00028-1 (Pubitemid 129563032)
104. The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Crespi G, D'Este P, Fontana R, et al. Res Policy 2011 40 1 55 68 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.010
105. If star scientists do not patent: the effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world. Calderini M, Franzoni C, Vezzulli A, Res Policy 2007 36 3 303 319 10.1016/j.respol.2006.11. 007 (Pubitemid 46436099)
106. Measuring knowledge spillovers: what patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Nelson AJ, Res Policy 2009 38 6 994 1005 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.023
107. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), The international patent system yearly review. Developments and performance in 2009 Geneva: WIPO 2010
108. What determines knowledge sourcing from host locations of overseas R&D operations?: A study of global R&D activities of Japanese multinationals. Song J, Asakawa K, Chu Y, Res Policy 2011 40 3 380 390 10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.002
109. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Moving up the value chain: staying competitive in the global economy Paris: OECD 2007
110. Belderbos R, Laten B, Suzuki S, Does excellence in academic research attract foreign R&D? Seville, Spain: Conference on corporate R&D (CONCORD) 2007
111. Measuring the impact of health research. Lavis J, Ross S, McLeod C, et al. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003 8 3 165 170 10.1258/135581903322029520 12869343 (Pubitemid 36850994)
112. Oancea A, Interpretations and practices of research impact across the range of disciplines Oxford: University of Oxford 2011
113. What shapes research impact on policy? Understanding research uptake in sexual and reproductive health policy processes in resource poor contexts. Sumner A, Crichton J, Theobald S, et al. Health Res Policy Syst 2011 9 Suppl 1 3 10.1186/1478-4505-9-S1-S3 21679384
114. The many meanings of research utilization. Weiss C, Public Admin Rev 1979 39 5 426 431 10.2307/3109916
115. Does evidence-based policy work? Learning from the UK experience. Boaz A, Grayson L, Levitt R, et al. Evidence & Policy 2008 4 2 233 253 10.1332/174426408784614680 23350054
116. Modernising Government: Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister and the Minister for the Cabinet Office by Command of Her Majesty. Cm 4310 London: Stationery Office 1999
117. Arthur D. Little Ltd., The social and economic impact of publicly funded research in 35 participating universities Cambridge: Arthur D. Little Limited 2006
118. Wellcome Trust, The role of scientists in public debate: full report. Research study conducted by MORI for The Wellcome Trust London: Wellcome Trust 2000
119. Science communication-interactions with the mass media. Peters HP, Brossard D, de Cheveigne S, et al. Science 2008 321 5886 204 205 10.1126/science.1157780 18625578 (Pubitemid 351989079)
120. What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers. Bartlett C, Sterne J, Egger M, BMJ 2002 325 7355 81 84 10.1136/bmj.325.7355.81 12114239 (Pubitemid 34774882)
121. How do US journalists cover treatments, tests, products, and procedures? An evaluation of 500 stories. Schwitzer G, PLoS Med 2008 5 5 700 704
122. Press releases by academic medical centers: not so academic? Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Casella SL, et al. Ann Intern Med 2009 150 9 613 618 19414840
123. University of Oxford, The University of Oxford on iTunes U [ http://itunes.ox.ac.uk/ ]
124. Department of Health, The NHS Constitution [ http://www.dh.gov.uk/ nhsconstitution ]
125. Priorities of independent medical research funding agencies in the UK. Ogilvie BM, Garnham D, Eur Rev 1997 5 2 147 160
126. Davies SM, Identity and ideology: a comparative study of academic health organisations in the UK and the USA London: Nuffield Trust 2002
127. An assessment of the impact of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Hanney S, Buxton M, Green C, et al. Health Technol Assess 2007 11 53
128. Fitzpatrick S, Staffing levels of medical clinical academics in UK medical schools as at 31 July 2009: A report by the Medical Schools Council London: Medical Schools Council 2010
129. Does the concept of KT capture the complexity between research and practice? Oancea A, Using evidence: advances and debates in bridging health research and action Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Atlantic Health Promotion Research Centre, Lyons R, 2010
130. Lyons R, Using evidence: advances and debates in bridging health research and action Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Atlantic Health Promotion Research Centre 2010
131. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), About clinical guidelines [ http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/whatwedo/ aboutclinicalguidelines/about-clinical-guidelines.jsp ]
132. Beyond citation analysis: a model for assessment of research impact. Sarli CC, Dubinsky EK, Holmes KL, J Med Libr Assoc 2010 98 1 17 23 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.008 20098647
133. Tracking the impact of research on policy and practice: investigating the feasibility of using citations in clinical guidelines for research evaluation. Kryl D, Allen L, Dolby K, et al. BMJ Open 2012 2 2 000897 http://dx.doi.org/10. 1136/bmjopen-2012-000897 22466037
134. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL, Fundamentals of clinical trials New York: Springer 4 2010
135. The historical development of clinical therapeutic trials. Bull JP, J Chronic Dis 1959 10 218 248 10.1016/0021-9681(59)90004-9 13805863
136. University of Oxford Clinical Trials and Research Governance Team, Clinical trials units (CTUs) [ http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/researchsupport/ctrg/ clinicaltrials/ctu/ ]
137. Shumaker SA, Ockene JK, Riekert KA, The handbook of health behavior change New York: Springer 3 2009
138. National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement (NCCPE), What is public engagement? [ http://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/what ]
139. Research Councils UK (RCUK), Concordat for engaging the public with research. A set of principles drawn by the funders of research in the UK UK: RCUK 2010
140. Royal Society, Science communication: survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers London: Royal Society 2006
141. Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An exploratory study of European research institutions. Neresini F, Bucchi M, Public Underst Sci 2011 20 1 64 79 10.1177/0963662510388363
142. Key Indicator in Academic Medicine: gender diversity in medical school applicants and matriculants. Roskovensky LB, Grbic D, Matthew D, Acad Med 2012 87 2 244 245 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182426a13 22273621
143. Key Indicator in Academic Medicine: ethnic origin and racial composition of Hispanic medical school applicants and matriculants. Grbic D, Mikesell C, Acad Med 2012 87 2 246 247 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182426a37 22273622
144. Athena SWAN awards: Bridging the gender gap in UK science. Donald A, Harvey PH, McLean AR, Nature 2011 478 7367 36 21979034
145. Athena SWAN, Awards [ http://www.athenaswan.org.uk/content/awards ]
146. Academic medical centers and the care of underserved populations. Moy E, Valente E Jr, Levin RJ, et al. Acad Med 1996 71 12 1370 1377 10.1097/00001888-199612000-00024 9114901
147. United Nations, Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Approved by the General Assembly at its Plenary Meeting on 6 December 1948
148. Sachs J, Common wealth: economics for a crowded planet New York: Penguin Press 2008
149. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, et al. Lancet 2008 372 9650 1661 1669 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6 18994664
150. UN Millennium Project, Investing in development: a practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals New York: United Nations 2005
151. United Nations Department of Public Information, Academic impact [ http://academicimpact.org ]
152. University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Tropical medicine [ http://www.tropicalmedicine.ox.ac.uk ]
153. HM Government, A strong Britain in an age of uncertainty: the national security strategy Norwich: The Stationery Office 2010
154. Safety and immunogenicity of AS03B adjuvanted split virion versus non-adjuvanted whole virion H1N1 influenza vaccine in UK children aged 6 months-12 years: open label, randomised, parallel group, multicentre study. Waddington CS, Walker WT, Oeser C, et al. BMJ 2010 340 2649 10.1136/bmj.c2649 20508026
155. Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Swine flu clinical trial results published [ http://oxfordbrc.nihr.ac.uk/swine-flu-clinical-trial- results-published/ ]
156. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), Selection of staff for inclusion in RAE 2008 London: HEFCE 2009
157. Manfredi DS, Vickers L, Impact of the process to promote equality and diversity in the Research Assessment Exercise 2008 London: Equality Challenge Unit 2009