Beyond citation analysis: A model for assessment of research impact

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 17-23

  Sarli, Cathy C ^b   Dubinsky, Ellen K ^a   Holmes, Kristi L ^b  

^a BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 75649139181     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.008     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Nicolaisen J. Citation analysis. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol. 2007;41(1):609-41.
2. Kostoff RN. The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation. Scientometrics. 1998 Sep;43(1):27-43.
3. Lawani SM. Citation analysis and the quality of scientific productivity. BioScience. 1977 Jan;27(1):26-31.
4. Wade N. Citation analysis: a new tool for science administrators. Science. 1975 May 2;188(4187):429-32.
5. MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR. Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics. 1996 Jul;36(3):435-44.
6. Phelan TJ. A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics. 1999 May;45(1):117-36.
7. Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vision Research Coordinating Center. Ocular hypertension treatment study [Internet]. St. Louis, MO: The School; 2009 [cited 29 May 2009]. https://vrcc.wustl.edu.
8. Sieving PC. The impact of NEI-funded multi-center trials: bibliometric indications of dissemination, acceptance and implementation of trial findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci [Internet]. 2007;48:E-abstract 2389 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://abstracts.iovs.org/cgi/content/abstract/48/5/2389? maxtoshow5&HITS510&hits510&RESULTFORMAT51&author15sieving& andorexacttitle5and&andorexacttitleabs5and&andorexactfulltext5and& searchid51&FIRSTINDEX50&sortspec5relevance&fdate52/1/ 2000&resourcetype5HWCI.
9. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Logic model development guide [Internet]. Battle Creek, MI: The Foundation; 2004 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.wkkf.org/ Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf.
10. Lavis J, Ross S, McLeod C, Gildiner A. Measuring the impact of health research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jul;8(3):165-70.
11. Australian Research Council. Excellence in research for Australia (ERA) initiative [Internet]. Canberra, Australia: The Council; 2008 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/ERA-ConsultationPaper.pdf.
12. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Developing a CIHR framework for measuring the impact of health research: synthesis report of meetings, February 23, 24, and May 18, 2005 [Internet]. Ottawa, ON, Canada: The Institutes; 2005 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/meeting-synthesis-e. pdf.
13. Weiss AP. Measuring the impact of medical research: moving from outputs to outcomes. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;164(2):206-14.
14. Trochim WM, Marcus SE, Mâsse LC, Moser RP, Weld PC. The evaluation of large research initiatives: a participatory integrative mixed-methods approach. Am J Eval. 2008;29(1):8-28.
15. Hanney SR, Grant J, Wooding S, Buxton MJ. Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of research: the impact of funding by the UK's Arthritis Research Campaign. Health Res Policy Syst. 2004 Jul 23;2(1):4.
16. RAND Europe. Measuring the benefits from research [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: RAND Europe; 2006 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.rand.org/pubs/research- briefs/2007/RAND-RB9202.pdf.
17. Tertiary Education Commission. Performance based research fund (PBRF) [Internet]. Wellington, New Zealand: The Commission; 2008 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.tec.govt.nz/templates/standard.aspx?id5588.
18. Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Pleasant A, Walt G. Describing the impact of health research: a research impact framework. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2006 Oct 18;6:134. [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/6/134/.
19. Kalucy L, McIntyre E, Jackson-Bowers E. Primary health care research impact project: final report stage 1 [Internet]. Adelaide, Australia: Flinders University; 2007 [cited 29 May 2009]. www.phcris.org.au/phplib/filedownload.php? file5/elib/lib/downloaded-files/publications/pdfs/phcris-pub-3338.pdf.
20. Flinders University, Adelaide Department of General Practice, Primary Health Care Research and Information Service. Focus on understanding and measuring research impact [Internet]. Adelaide, Australia: The University; 2005 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.phcris.org.au/phplib/filedownload.php?file5/ elib/lib/downloaded-files/publications/pdfs/phcris-pub-3236.pdf.
21. Washington University School of Medicine, Bernard Becker Medical Library. Becker Medical Library model for assessment of research impact [Internet]. St. Louis, MO: The School; 2009 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.becker.wustl.edu/ impact/assessment/.
22. National Institutes of Health. Rare Diseases Clinical Research Consortia (RDCRC) for the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (U54) [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: The Institutes; 2009 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.grants.nih. gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-OD-08-001.html.
23. National Institutes of Health. Enhancing peer review: the NIH announces enhanced review criteria for evaluation of research applications received for potential FY2010 funding [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: The Institutes; 2009 [cited 29 May 2009]. http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-09-025. html.