University-industry collaboration in Italy: A bibliometric examination

Technovation

Volumn 29, Issue 6-7, 2009, Pages 498-507

  Abramo, Giovanni ^a,b   D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ^a   Di Costa, Flavia ^a   Solazzi, Marco ^a  

^a School of Engineering   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Italy; Multidisciplinarity; R D cooperation; University industry collaboration

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; CO AUTHORSHIPS; DOMESTIC INDUSTRIES; IMPACT FACTORS; INFORMATION ENGINEERINGS; ITALY; MULTIDISCIPLINARITY; NATIONAL MAPPINGS; PRIVATE SECTORS; PUBLIC PRIVATES; RESEARCH COLLABORATIONS; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE; UNIVERSITY RESEARCHERS; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION;

SODIUM COMPOUNDS;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 67349207346     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abramo G. Il trasferimento tecnologico pubblico-privato: un'analisi integrata del sistema Italia. Rivista di Politica Economica 3-4 (2007) 45-86
2. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C.A., 2009. The alignment of public research supply and industry demand for effective technology transfer: the case of Italy. Science and Public Policy, forthcoming.
3. Abramo G., and Pugini F. L'attività di licensing delle università italiane: un'indagine empirica. Economia e Politica Industriale XXXII 3 (2005) 43-60
4. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., and Caprasecca A. Allocative efficiency in public research funding: can bibliometrics help?. Research Policy 38 (2009) 206-215
5. Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., and Di Costa F. Assessment of sectorial aggregation distortion in research productivity measurements. Research Evaluation 17 12 (2008) 111-121
6. Balconi M., and Laboranti A. University-industry interactions in applied research: the case of microelectronics. Research Policy 35 (2006) 1616-1630
7. Barnes T., Pashby I., and Gibbons A. Effective university-industry interaction: a multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects. European Management Journal 20 3 (2002) 272-285
8. Belkhodja, O., Landry, R., 2005. The Triple Helix collaboration: why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors influencing the perceived barriers? In: Proceedings of the Fifth Triple Helix Conference, Turin, Italy May 18th-21st 2005.
9. Boardman, C.P., Ponomariov, B.L., 2008. University researchers working with private companies. Technovation, DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.008.
10. EC-Commission of the European Communities, 1995. Green Paper on innovation. COM 688.
11. D'Este P., and Patel P. University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry?. Research Policy 36 (2007) 1295-1313
12. Drejer I., and Jorgensen B.H. The dynamic creation of knowledge: analysing public-private collaborations. Technovation 25 (2005) 83-94
13. Grandi, A., Sobrero, M. (Eds.), 2005. Innovazione tecnologica e gestione di impresa. Società editrice Il Mulino, ISBN:88-15-10553-0.
14. Istat, 2003. La Ricerca e Sviluppo in Italia, anno 2001, previsioni per gli anni 2002-2003.
15. Katz J.S., and Martin B.R. What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 26 (1997) 1-18
16. Laudel G. What do we measure by co-authorships?. Research Evaluation 11 1 (2002) 3-15
17. Lee Y.S. The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: an empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer 25 (2000) 111-133
18. Lee J., and Mansfield E. The modern university: contributor to modern innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy 25 7 (1996) 1047-1058
19. Lundberg J., Tomson G., Lundkvist I., Skar J., and Brommels M. Collaboration uncovered: exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics 69 3 (2006) 575-589
20. Melin G., and Persson O. Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics 36 3 (1996) 363-377
21. Meyer-Krahmer F., and Schmoch U. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 27 (1998) 835-851
22. Moed H.F., and Van Leeuwen Th.N. Impact factors can mislead. Nature 381 (1996) 186
23. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., and Ziedonis A.A. The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy 30 (2001) 99-119
24. National Science Foundation, 2003. Academic R&D expenditures: FY 2001. NSF 03-316.
25. Owen-Smith J., Riccaboni M., Pammolli F., and Powell W.W. A comparison of US and European university-industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science 48 1 (2002) 24-43
26. Shane S. Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing 19 (2004) 127-151
27. Thursby J.G., and Thursby M.C. University licensing and the Bayh-Dole Act. Science 301 (2003) 5636 1052
28. Tijssen R.J.W. Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles. Research Policy 33 5 (2004) 709-733
29. Van Looy B., Ranga M., Callaert J., Debackere K., and Zimmermann E. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?. Research Policy 33 3 (2004) 425-441
30. Veugelers R., and Cassiman B. R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23 (2005) 355-379
31. Weingart P. Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: inadvertent consequences?. In: Moed H.F., Glänzel W., and Schmoch U. (Eds). Handbook on Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
32. Zuckerman S.Z. Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Frontiers of Public and Private Science (1971), Taplinger Publishing Company, New York