Using bibliometrics to support the procurement of NIHR biomedieal research centres in England

Research Evaluation

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 71-82

  Van Leeuwen, Thed ^a   Hoorens, Stijn ^b   Grant, Jonathan ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 64549137088     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820209X414178     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Academy of Medical Science 2003. Strengthening Clinical Research. London: Academy of Medical Science.
2. Biosciences Innovation and Growth Team 2003. Bioscience 2015. London: BIGT.
3. Cooksey, D 2006. A Review of UK Health Research Funding. Norwich: HMSO.
4. DH, Department of Health 2003. Best Research for Best Health: a New National Health Research Strategy. London: DH.
5. Lewison, G, R Cottrell and D Dixon 1999. Bibliometric indicators to assist the peer review process in grant decisions. Research Evaluation, 8(1), March, 47-52.
6. Moed, H F 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation, especially Part 1, pp. 1-69. Heidelberg: Springer.
7. Moed, H F, R E de Bruin RE and T N van Leeuwen TN (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33, 381-425.
8. NAO, National Audit Office 2003. Getting the Evidence: Using Research in Policy Making (HC 586-1 Session 2002-2003).
9. RCUK, Research Councils UK 2006a. Report of the Research Councils UK Efficiency and Effectiveness of Peer Review Project. Swindon: RCUK.
10. RCUK, Research Councils UK 2006b. Analysis of the External Costs of Peer Review: a Final Report. Swindon: RCUK.
11. Van Leeuwen, T N and J Grant 2006. Bibliometric Analysis of Highly Cited Publications of Health Research in England, 1995-2004. Cambridge: RAND Europe.
12. Van Leeuwen, T N, H F Moed, RJW Tijssen, M S Visser and A F J van Raan 2001. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance, Scientometrics, 51, 335-346.
13. Van Leeuwen, T N, M S Visser, H F Moed, A J Nederhof and A F J van Raan 2003. The holy grail of science policy: exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence, Scientometrics, 53, 257-280.