Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 283-291

  Orsini, M Gabriela ^a   Huang, Greg J ^b   Kiyak, H Asuman ^b   Ramsay, Douglas S ^b   Bollen, Anne Marie ^b   Anderson, Nina K ^c   Giddon, Donald B ^c  

^a Fort Meyers   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASIAN; ATTITUDE; CAUCASIAN; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DENTAL CARE; ESTHETICS; EVALUATION; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; PROGNATHIA; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC OPINION; RETROGNATHIA; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL METHOD;

ADULT; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ATTITUDE; BEAUTY; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; EVALUATION STUDIES; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; PROGNATHISM; PUBLIC OPINION; RETROGNATHISM; SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL;

EID: 33748458439     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.026     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Giddon D.B. Orthodontic applications of psychological and perceptual studies of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod 1 (1995) 82-93
2. Pogrell M.A. What are normal esthetic values?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 (1991) 963-969
3. Sarver D.M., and Ackerman J. Orthodontics about face: the reemergence of the esthetic paradigm. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117 (2000) 575-576
4. Sarver D.M. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120 (2001) 98-111
5. Kokich Jr. V.O., Kiyak H.A., and Shapiro P.A. Comparing the perception of dentists and laypeople to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 11 (1999) 311-324
6. Merrifield L.L. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 52 (1966) 804-822
7. Lines P.A., Lines R.R., and Lines C.A. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 73 (1978) 648-657
8. Phillips C., Trentini C.J., and Douvartzidis N. The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50 (1992) 590-594
9. Prahl-Anderson B., and Boersma H. Perception of dentofacial morphology by layperson, general dentist, and orthodontist. J Am Dent Assoc 98 (1979) 209-212
10. Foster E.J. Profile preference among diversified groups. Am J Orthod 63 (1973) 34-40
11. Mejia-Maidl M., Evans C.A., Viana G., Anderson N.K., and Giddon D.B. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 953-958
12. Kerr W.J., and O'Donnell J.M. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 17 (1990) 299-304
13. Arndt E.M., Travis F., Lefebvre A., Niec A., and Munro I.R. Beauty and the eye of the beholder: social consequences and personal adjustments for facial patients. Br J Plast Surg 39 (1986) 81-84
14. Shaw W.C. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 79 (1981) 399-415
15. Linn E.L. Social meanings of dental appearance. J Health Soc Behav 17 (1976) 289-295
16. Albino J.E., Lawrence S.D., and Tedesco L.A. Psychological and social effects of orthodontic treatment. J Behav Med 17 (1994) 81-98
17. Kenealy P., Frude N., and Shaw W. An evaluation of the psychological and social effects of malocclusion: some implications for dental policy making. Soc Sci Med 28 (1989) 583-591
18. Jacobson A. Psychological aspects of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 54 (1984) 18-35
19. Shaw W.C. Folklore surrounding facial deformity and the origins of facial prejudice. Br J Plast Surg 34 (1981) 237-246
20. Langlois J.H. Origins and functions of stereotypes: theoretical and applied implications. In: Eder R.A. (Ed). Developmental perspectives on craniofacial problems (1995), Springer-Verlag, New York 22-47
21. Devine P.G. Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. J Pers Soc Psychol 56 (1989) 5-18
22. Riedel R.A. An analysis of dentofacial relationships. Am J Orthod 43 (1957) 103-119
23. Peck H., and Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 40 (1970) 284-317
24. Barclay A., and Thumin F.J. A modified semantic differential approach to attitudinal assessment. J Clin Psychol 19 (1963) 376-378
25. Arthur A.Z. Clinical use of the semantic differential. J Clin Psychol 21 (1965) 337-338
26. Osgood C.E. Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures. Am Anthropol 66 (1964) 171-200
27. Williams J.E. Connotations of racial concepts and color names. J Pers Soc Psychol 3 (1966) 531-540
28. Prothro E.T., and Keehn J.D. Stereotypes and semantic space. J Soc Psychol 45 (1957) 197-209
29. Gusfield J.R., and Schwartz M. The meanings of occupational prestige. Am Soc Rev 28 (1963) 265-271
30. Giddon D.B., Hershon L.E., and Lennartson B. Discrepancy between objective and subjective profile measures. Scand J Dent Res 82 (1974) 527-535
31. Giddon D.B., Sconzo R., Kinchen J., and Evans C. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Angle Orthod 66 (1996) 441-448
32. Giddon D.B., Evans C., Bernier D., and Kinchen J. Comparison of two computer-animated imaging programs for quantifying facial profile preference. Percept Mot Skills 82 (1996) 1251-1264
33. Hier L.A., Evans C., BeGole E.A., and Giddon D. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging. Angle Orthod 69 (1999) 231-238
34. Greenwald A.G., and Banaji M.R. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev 102 (1995) 4-27
35. Greenwald A.G., and Nosek B.A. Health of the implicit association test at age 3. Z Exp Psychol Rev 48 (2001) 85-93
36. Greenwald A.G., Banaji M.R., Rudman L.A., Farnham S.D., Nosek B.A., and Mellott D.S. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychol Rev 109 (2000) 3-25
37. Dasgupta N., McGhee D.E., Greenwald A.G., and Banaji M.R. Automatic preference for white Americans: eliminating the familiarity explanation. J Exp Soc Psychol 36 (2000) 316-328
38. Hummert M.L., Garstka T.A., O'Brien L.T., Greenwald A.G., and Mellott D.S. Using the implicit association test to measure age differences in implicit social cognitions. Psychol Aging 17 (2002) 482-495
39. Schwartz M.B., Chambliss H.O., Brownell K.D., Blair S.N., and Billington C. Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity. Obes Res 11 (2003) 1033-1039
40. Shelly A.D., Southard T.E., Southard K.A., Casko J.S., Jakobsen J.R., Fridrik K.L., et al. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117 (2000) 630-637
41. McCarthy J.G., Ruff G.L., and Zide B.M. A surgical system for the correction of bony chin deformity. Clin Plast Surg 18 (1991) 139-152
42. Belleza F.S., Greenwald A.G., and Banaji M.R. Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 18 (1986) 299-303
43. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., and Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol 85 (2003) 197-216
44. Holdaway R.A. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning, part I. Am J Orthod 84 (1983) 1-28
45. Legan H.C., and Burstone C.J. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 38 (1980) 744-751
46. Alcalde R.E., Jinno T., Orsini M.G., Sasaki A., and Sugiyama R. Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 (2000) 84-89
47. Lew K.K., Soh G., and Loh E. Ranking of facial profiles among Asians. J Esthet Dent 4 (1992) 128-130
48. Mantzikos T. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 (1998) 1-7
49. Mihalik C.A., Proffit W.R., and Phillips C. Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 (2003) 266-278
50. Thomas P.M. Orthodontic camouflage vs. orthognathic surgery in the treatment of mandibular deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53 (1995) 579-587
51. Ackerman J.L., and Proffit W.R. Soft tissue limitations in orthodontics: treatment planning guidelines. Angle Orthod 67 (1997) 327-336
52. Proffit W.R., Phillips C., Tulloch J.F., and Medland P.H. Surgical versus orthodontic correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adolescents: effects and indications. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 7 (1992) 209-220