Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 371-376

  O'Neill, Kieran ^c   Harkness, Michael ^a   Knight, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0034297915     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.109492     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barrer JG, Ghafari JG. Silhouette profiles in the assessment of facial esthetics: a comparison of cases treated with various orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod 1985;87:385-91.
2. Cox NH, van der Linden FPGM. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod 1971;60:175-83.
3. Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:180-7.
4. Burcal RG, Laskin DM, Sperry TP. Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:666-70.
5. Dunlevy HA, White RP, Proffit WR, Turvey TA. Professional and lay judgement of facial esthetic changes following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1987;3:151-8.
6. Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod 1973;43:34-40.
7. Kerr WJS, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990;17:299-304.
8. Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1978;73:648-57.
9. Prahl-Anderson B, Boersma H, van der Linden FPGM, Moore AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:209-12.
10. Romani KL, Agahi F, Nanda R, Zernik JH. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod 1993;63:175-82.
11. Shaw WC, Lewis HG, Robertson NRE. Perception of malocclusion. Br Dent J 1975;138:211-6.
12. Tedesco LA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, Green LJ, Lewis EA, Slakter MJ. A dental-facial attractiveness scale: part I. reliability and validity. Am J Orthod 1983;83:38-43.
13. Witzig JW, Spahl TJ. The clinical management of basic maxillofacial appliances. I. mechanics. Littleton, Mass: PSG Publishing; 1987.
14. British Standards Institution 1983 BS4492, British standard glossary of terms relating to dentistry. London: British Standards Institution; 1983.
15. Eirew HL, McDowell F, Phillips JG. The Fränkel appliance: avoidance of lower incisor proclination. Br J Orthod 1981;8:189-91.
16. McNamara JA, Huge SA. The Fränkel appliance (FR-2): model preparation and appliance construction. Am J Orthod 1981;80:478-95.
17. Harvold EP. The activator in interceptive orthodontics. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1974.
18. Courtney M, Harkness M, Herbison P. Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:616-24.
19. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P. Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:153-61.
20. Webster T, Harkness M, Herbison, P. Associations between changes in selected facial dimensions and the outcome of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996:110:46-53.
21. Anastasi A. Psychological testing, 6th ed. New York: Collier Macmillan; 1988.
22. Aitken RCB. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 1969;62:989-93.
23. Howells DJ, Shaw WC. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod 1985;88:402-8.
24. Phillips C, Trentini CJ, Douvartzidis N. The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:590-4.
25. Hershon LE, Giddon DB. Determinants of facial profile self perception. Am J Orthod 1980;78:279-95.
26. Klima RJ, Wittemann JK, McIver JE. Body image, self concept, and the orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod 1979;75:507-16.
27. Baldwin DWC. Appearance and aesthetics in oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980;8:244-56.
28. Terry RL, Davis JS. Components of facial attractiveness. Perceptual Mot Skills 1976;42:918.
29. Terry RL. Further evidence on components of facial attractiveness. Perceptual Mot Skills 1977;45:130.
30. Bhatia SN, Leighton BC. A manual of facial growth: a compter analysis of longitudinal cephalometric growth data. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
31. Genecov JS, Sinclair PM, Dechow PC. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. Angle Orthod 1990;60:191-8.
32. Shaw WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981;79:399-415.
33. De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 1984;86:67-73.
34. Nielsen IL. Facial growth during treatment with the function regulator appliance. Am J Orthod 1984;85:401-10.
35. Owen AH. Morphologic changes in the sagittal dimension using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod 1981;80:573-603.
36. Owen AH. Maxillary incisolabial responses in Class II Division 1 treatment with Fränkel and edgewise. Angle Orthod 1986;56: 67-87.