Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 77, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 808-816

  Tadic, Nevenka ^a   Woods, Michael G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Class II; Lip changes; Premolar extractions

Indexed keywords

EID: 35248894958     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/081706-336     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson J, Joondeph D, Turpin D. A cephalometric study of profile changes in orthodontically treated cases ten years out retention. Angle Orthod. 1973;43:324-335.
2. Ricketts RM. Aesthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod. 1968;54:272-289.
3. Rudee D. Proportional profile changes concurrent with orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:421-434.
4. Talass MF, Talass L, Baker RC. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;95:385-394.
5. Waldman BH. Change in lip contour with maxillary incisor retraction. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:129-134.
6. Wisth PJ. Soft tissue response to upper incisor retraction in boys. Br J Orthod. 1974;1:199-204.
7. Lin PT, Woods MG. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment. Aust Orthod J. 2004;21:71-86.
8. Moseling K, Woods MG. Lip curve changes in females with premolar extraction or non-extraction treatment. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:51-62.
9. Ong HB, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of maxillary first and second premolar extraction effects. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:90-102.
10. Shearn BN, Woods MG. An occlusal and cephalometric analysis of lower first and second premolar extraction effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:351-361.
11. Wholley CJ, Woods MG. The effects of commonly prescribed premolar extraction sequences on the curvature of the upper and lower lips. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:386-395.
12. Shell T, Woods MG. Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar Class II cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:365-373.
13. Bokas JM, Collett T. Effect of upper premolar extractions on the position of the upper lip. Aust Orthod J. 2006;22:31-37.
14. Stephens CK, Boley JC, Behrents RG, Alexander RG, Buschang PH. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128:450-457.
15. Conley SR, Jernigan C. Soft tissue changes after upper premolar extraction in Class II camouflage therapy. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:59-65.
16. Hershey HG. Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in post-adolescent female patients. Am J Orthod. 1972;61:45-53.
17. Lo FD, Hunter WS. Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:384-391.
18. Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE. The effects of premolarextraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in "clearcut" extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 1993;63:257-272.
19. Rains MA, Nanda R. Soft tissue changes associated with maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:481-488.
20. Ramos AL, Sakima MT, Pinto AS, Bowman SJ. Upper lip changes correlated to maxillary incisor retraction - a metallic implant study. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:499-505.
21. Abdel Kader HM. Vertical lip height and dental height changes in relation to the reduction of overjet and overbite in Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:260-263.
22. Sherman SL, Woods MG, Nanda RS. Longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits Appraisal. Am J Orthod. 1988;93:429-436.
23. Proffit WR, Fields HWJ. Contemporary Orthodontics. St Louis, Mo: Mosby Year Book; 2000:155-156.
24. Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. The morphological morphogenic basis for craniofacial form and pattern. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:161-188.
25. Zierhut EC, Joondeph DR, Artun J, Little RM. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:208-219.
26. Foley TF, Duncan PG. Soft tissue profile changes in late adolescent males. Angle Orthod. 1997;76:373-380.
27. Meng HP, Goorhuis J, Kapila S, Nanda RS. Growth changes in the nasal profile from 7 to 18 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:317-326.
28. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR. Soft tissue limitations in orthodontics: treatment planning guidelines. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:327-336.
29. Kuyl MH, Verbeek RMH, Dermaut LR. The integumental profile: a reflection of the underlying skeletal configuration? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;6:597-604.
30. Roos N. Soft-tissue profile changes in Class II treatment. Am J Orthod. 1977;72:165-174.
31. Subtelny JD. The soft tissue profile, growth and treatment changes. Angle Orthod. 1961;31:105-122.
32. Garner LD. Soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:367-377.
33. Bishara SE, Peterson LC. Changes in the facial dimensions and relationships between the ages of 5 and 25 years. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:238-252.
34. Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LEJ. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:1-14.