Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 119, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 464-471

  Spyropoulos, Meropi N ^a   Halazonetis, Demetrios J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DENTIST; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; PHOTOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; BEAUTY; CHILD; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DENTISTS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; PHOTOGRAPHY;

EID: 0035348283     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.113656     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bowman SJ. More than lip service: facial esthetics in orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:1173-81.
2. Lemley B. Isn't she lovely? Discover 2000;21:42-9.
3. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1970;40:284-317.
4. Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1978;73:648-57.
5. Prahl-Andersen B, Boersma H, van der Linden FPGM, Moore AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:209-12.
6. Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:180-7.
7. Spyropoulos MN. A contribution to the study of the facial profile in relation to its supporting dento-skeletal structures [thesis]. Athens (Greece): Athens University; 1972.
8. Spyropoulos MN, Aesthetics and individuality in orthodontics [abstract]. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:462.
9. Halazonetis DJ. Morphing and warping. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:466-70.
10. Halazonetis DJ. Computer-assisted cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:517-21.
11. Langlois JH, Roggman LA. Attractive faces are only average. Psychol Sci 1990;1:115-21.
12. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
13. Shelly AD, Southard TE, Southard KA, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR, Fridrich KL, et al. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:630-7.
14. Perrett DI, May K, Yoshikawa S. Attractive characteristics of female faces: preference for non-average shape. Nature 1994;368:239-42.
15. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 1998;394:884-7.
16. Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:164-8.
17. Giddon DB, Sconzo R, Kinchen JA, Evans CA. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Angle Orthod 1996;66:441-8.
18. Proffit WR, Phillips C, Douvartzidis N. A comparison of outcomes of orthodontic and surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:556-65.
19. Fink B, Grammer K. Skin surface and female facial beauty. The influence of skin texture on the attractiveness of female faces. 1999; http://evolution.humb.univie.ac.at/institutes/urbanethology/student/html/ bernhard/finkpro_tex.html.
20. Kerr WJS, O'Donell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990;17:299-304.
21. Cox NH, van der Linden FPGM. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod 1971;60:175.
22. Foster EJ. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod 1973;43:34.
23. De Smit SD, Dermaut L. Soft tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 1984;86:67-73.