Carbon turnover in mixed stands: Modelling possible shifts under climate change

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 251, Issue , 2013, Pages 232-245

  Shanin, Vladimir ^a   Komarov, Alexander ^a   Khoraskina, Yulia ^a   Bykhovets, Sergey ^a   Linkosalo, Tapio ^b   Mäkipää, Raisa ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN SOIL SCIENCE   (Russian Federation)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Boreal forests; Carbon balance; Competition; Resource use; Soil nutrients

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS PRODUCTIONS; BOREAL FORESTS; CARBON AND NITROGEN; CARBON BALANCE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL; CARBON STOCKS; CARBON TURNOVER; CHANGING CLIMATE; CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS; CLIMATE SCENARIOS; CLIMATIC SCENARIOS; CONIFEROUS STANDS; DECIDUOUS SPECIES; DOMINANT SPECIES; FINNISH; FOREST FLOORS; FOREST STAND; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; INDIVIDUAL-BASED SIMULATIONS; INITIAL DENSITY; MESIC SITES; MINERAL SOILS; NORWAY SPRUCE; RESOURCE USE; SCOTS PINE; SILVER BIRCH; SOIL DATA; SOIL NUTRIENTS; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER DYNAMICS; SOUTHERN FINLAND; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT; SPECIES COMPOSITION; TREE SPECIES; TREE SPECIES COMPOSITION;

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMASS; CARBON; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPETITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GEOLOGIC MODELS; NUTRIENTS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PRODUCTIVITY; SOILS;

FORESTRY;

ACCUMULATION; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; BOREAL FOREST; CARBON BALANCE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DECIDUOUS FOREST; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FOREST FLOOR; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; NITROGEN; PRODUCTIVITY; RESOURCE USE; SHRUB; SOIL CARBON; SOIL NITROGEN; SOIL NUTRIENT; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; STAND STRUCTURE; TURNOVER; WARMING;

FINLAND;

MYRTILLUS; PICEA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 84872744162     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research), 2005a. IPCC DDC AR4 NCAR-CCSM3 20C3M run1. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB NCAR_CCSM3_20C3M_1. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=NCAR_CCSM3_20C3M_1.
2. NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research), 2005b. IPCC DDC AR4 NCAR-CCSM3 SRESA1B run1. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB NCAR_CCSM3_SRESA1B_1. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=NCAR_CCSM3_SRESA1B_1.
3. NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research), 2007a. IPCC DDC AR4 NCAR-CCSM3 20C3M run2. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB NCAR_CCSM3_20C3M_2. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=NCAR_CCSM3_20C3M_2.
4. NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research), 2007b. IPCC DDC AR4 NCAR-CCSM3 SRESA1B run2. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB NCAR_CCSM3_SRESA1B_2. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=NCAR_CCSM3_SRESA1B_2.
5. NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research), 2007c. IPCC DDC AR4 NCAR-CCSM3 20C3M run3. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB NCAR_CCSM3_20C3M_3. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=NCAR_CCSM3_20C3M_3.
6. NCAR (National Center for Atmospheric Research), 2007d. IPCC DDC AR4 NCAR-CCSM3 SRESA1B run3. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB NCAR_CCSM3_SRESA1B_3. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=NCAR_CCSM3_SRESA1B_3.
7. Araújo M.B., Guisan A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography 2006, 33:1677-1688.
8. Austin M.P., Smith T.M., Van Niel K.P., Wellington A.B. Physiological responses and statistical models of the environmental niche: a comparative study of two co-occurring Eucalyptus species. Journal of Ecology 2009, 97:496-507.
9. Bobbink R., Hicks K., Galloway J., Spranger T., Alkemade R., Ashmore M., et al. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecological Applications 2010, 20(1):30-59.
10. Boisvenue C., Running S.W. Impacts of climate change on natural forest productivity - evidence since the middle of the 20th century. Global Change Biology 2006, 12(5):862-882.
11. Bolte A., Villanueva I. Interspecific competition impacts on the morphology and distribution of fine roots in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). European Journal of Forest Research 2006, 125(1):15-26.
12. Bond-Lamberty B., Peckham S.D., Ahl D.E., Gower S.T. The dominance of fire in determining carbon balance of the central Canadian boreal forest. Nature 2007, 450:89-92.
13. Bormann B.T., Spaltenstein H., McClellan M.H., Ugolini F.C., Cromack K., Nay S.M. Rapid soil development after windthrow disturbance in pristine forests. Journal of Ecology 1995, 83:747-757.
14. Brassard B.W., Chen H.Y.H., Bergeron Y., Paré D. Differences in fine root productivity between mixed- and single-species stands. Functional Ecology 2011, 25:238-246.
15. Breshears D.D., Myers O.B., Meyer C.W., Barnes F.J., Zou C.B., Allen C.D., et al. Tree die-off in response to global change-type drought: mortality insights from a decade of plant water-potential measurements. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7(4):185-189.
16. Bykhovets S.S., Komarov A.S. A simple statistical model of soil climate with a monthly step. Eurasian Soil Science 2002, 35(4):392-400.
17. Cajander A.K. Forest types and their significance. Acta Forestalia Fennica 1949, 56:1-71.
18. Callahan H.S., Del Fierro K., Patterson A.E., Zafar H. Impacts of elevated nitrogen inputs on oak reproductive and seed ecology. Global Change Biology 2008, 14(2):285-293.
19. Cao M., Woodward F.I. Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nature 1998, 393:249-252.
20. Cavard X., Bergeron Y., Chen H.Y.H., Paré D., Laganiére J., Brassard B. Competition and facilitation between tree species change with stand development. Oikos 2011, 120:1683-1695.
21. Chertov O.G., Bhatti J.S., Komarov A.S., Mikhailov A.V., Bykhovets S.S. Influence of climate change, fire and harvest on the carbon dynamics of black spruce in Central Canada. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 257(3):941-950.
22. Chertov O.G., Komarov A.S. SOMM: a model of soil organic matter dynamics. Ecological Modelling 1997, 94:177-189.
23. Chertov O.G., Komarov A.S., Nadporozhskaya M.A., Bykhovets S.S., Zudin S.L. ROMUL - a model of forest soil organic matter dynamic as a sustainable tool for forest ecosystem modelling. Ecological Modelling 2001, 138:289-308.
24. Chuine I., Beaubien E.G. Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range. Ecology Letters 2001, 4:500-510.
25. Coates K.D., Canham C.D., LePage P.T. Above- versus below-ground competitive effects and responses of a guild of temperate tree species. Journal of Ecology 2009, 97:118-130.
26. 2 have increased growth in natural stands of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). Global Change Biology 2010, 16(8):2186-2197.
27. Coops N.C., Waring R.H. Assessing forest growth across southwestern Oregon under a range of current and future global change scenarios using a process model, 3-PG. Global Change Biology 2001, 7(1):15-29.
28. Côté L., Brown S., Paré D., Fyles J., Bauhus J. Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in relation to stand type, stand age and soil texture in the boreal mixedwood. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2000, 32(8-9):1079-1090.
29. Drescher, M., Thomas, S.C. Snow cover manipulations alter survival of early life stages of cold-temperate tree species. Oikos., in press. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20642.x.
30. Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudík M., Ferrier S., Guisan A. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29:129-151.
31. 2 affects photosynthetic responses in canopy pine and subcanopy deciduous trees over 10 years: a synthesis from Duke FACE. Global Change Biology 2012, 18:223-242.
32. Fenton N., Lecomte N., Légaré S., Bergeron Y. Paludification in black spruce (Picea mariana) forests of eastern Canada: potential factors and management implications. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 213:151-159.
33. Ge Z.-M., Kellomäki S., Peltola H., Zhou X., Wang K.-Y., Väisänen H. Impacts of changing climate on the productivity of Norway spruce dominant stands with a mixture of Scots pine and birch in relation to water availability in southern and northern Finland. Tree Physiology 2011, 31:323-338.
34. Grabarnik P., Sarkka A. Modelling the spatial structure of forest stands by multivariate point processes with hierarchical interactions. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220:1232-1240.
35. Häkkinen M., Heikkinen J., Mäkipää R. Soil carbon stock increases in the organic layer of boreal middle-aged stands. Biogeosciences 2011, 8(5):1279-1289.
36. Hartmann H. Will a 385 million year-struggle for light become a struggle for water and for carbon? How trees may cope with more frequent climate change-type drought events. Global Change Biology 2011, 17(1):642-655.
37. Hendricks C.M.A., Bianchi F.J.J.A. Root density and root biomass in pure and mixed forest stands of douglas-fir and beech. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 1995, 43(3):321-331.
38. Högberg P. What is the quantitative relation between nitrogen deposition and forest carbon sequestration?. Global Change Biology 2012, 18:1-2.
39. Hotanen J.-P., Nousiainen H., Mäkipää R., Reinikainen A., Tonteri T. Metsätyypit-opas kasvupaikkojen luokitteluun (Forest types - guide to the classification of habitats). Metsäkustannus 2008, 192 pp. (In Finnish).
40. Huang J., Tardif J.C., Bergeron Y., Denneler B., Berninger F., Girardin M.P. Radial growth response of four dominant boreal tree species to climate along a latitudinal gradient in the eastern Canadian boreal forest. Global Change Biology 2010, 16(2):711-731.
41. Hynynen J., Repola J., Mielikäinen K. The effect of species mixture on the growth and yield of mid-rotation mixed stands of Scots pine and silver birch. Forest Ecology and Management 2011, 262:1174-1183.
42. Ilvesniemi H., Pumpanen J., Duursma R., Hari P., Keronen P., Kolari P., et al. Water balance of a boreal Scots pine forest. Boreal Environment Research 2010, 15(4):375-396.
43. Ilvessalo Y., Ilvessalo M. Suomen metsätyypit metsiköiden luontalsen kehitys- ja puuntuotto-kyvyn valossa (The forest types of Finland in the light of natural development and yield capacity of forest stands). Acta Forestalia Fennica 1975, 144:1-101. (Finnish with English summary).
44. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, 2001. Retrieved from http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/emission.
45. Iverson L.R., Prasad A.M. Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the Eastern United States. Ecological Monographs 1998, 68(4):465-485.
46. Iverson L.R., Prasad A.M. Potential changes in tree species richness and forest community types following climate change. Ecosystems 2001, 4:186-199.
47. Jõgiste K. Productivity of mixed stands of Norway spruce and birch affected by population dynamics: a model analysis. Ecological Modelling 1998, 106:77-91.
48. Johnston M., Campagna M., Gray P., Kope H., Loo J., Ogden A., et al. Vulnerability of Canada's Tree Species to Climate Change and Management Options for Adaptation: An Overview for Policy Makers and Practitioners 2009, Canadian Council of Forest Ministers, Ottawa, 40 pp.
49. Jose S., Williams R., Zamora D. Belowground ecological interactions in mixed-species forest plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 2006, 233:231-239.
50. Kahle H.-P., Karjalainen T., Schuck A., Ågren G.I., Kellomäki S., Mellert K.H., et al. Causes and Consequences of Forest Growth Trends in Europe - Results of the RECOGNITION Project 2008, Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden, 272 pp.
51. Karjalainen T., Pussinen A., Liski J., Nabuurs G.-J., Eggers T., Lapveteläinen T., et al. Scenario analysis of the impacts of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget. Forest Policy and Economics 2003, 5:141-155.
52. Karjalainen T., Pussinen A., Liski J., Nabuurs G.-J., Erhard M., Eggers T., et al. An approach towards an estimate of the impact of forests management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget: Germany as a case study. Forest Ecology and Management 2002, 162:87-103.
53. Kellomäki S., Peltola H., Nuutinen T., Korhonen K.T., Strandman H. Sensitivity of managed boreal forests in Finland to climate change, with implications for adaptive management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2008, 363:2341-2351.
54. Kelty M.J. Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed species stands. The Ecology of Mixed Species Forests 1992, 125-141. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. M.J. Kelty (Ed.).
55. Kelty M.J. The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry. Forest Ecology and Management 2006, 233:195-204.
56. Koivisto P. Kasvu- ja Tuottotaulukoita (Growth and yield tables). Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 1959, 51:1-49. (Finnish).
57. Kolari P., Pumpanen J., Rannik Ü., Ilvesniemi H., Hari P., Berninger F. Carbon balance of different aged Scots pine forests in Southern Finland. Global Change Biology 2004, 10:1106-1119.
58. Komarov A.S., Chertov O.G., Nadporozhskaya M.A., Mikhailov A.V., Bykhovets S.S., Zudin S.L., et al. Modelirovanie dinamiki organicheskogo veshchestva v lesnykh ekosistemakh (Modelling Organic Matter Dynamics in Forest Ecosystems) 2007, Nauka Publ., Moscow, 380 pp (Russian with English summary).
59. Komarov A.S., Chertov O.G., Zudin S.L., Nadporozhskaya M.A., Mikhailov A.V., Bykhovets S.S., et al. EFIMOD 2 - the system of simulation models of forest growth and elements cycles in forest ecosystems. Ecological Modelling 2003, 170:373-392.
60. Komarov A.S., Kubasova T.S. Modelling organic matter dynamics in conifer-broadleaf forests in different site types upon fires: a computational experiment. Biology Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2007, 34(4):408-416.
61. 3 concentrations throughout two subsequent growing seasons. Global Change Biology 2005, 11(9):1387-1401.
62. Kurz W.A., Stinson G., Rampley G. Could increased boreal forest ecosystem productivity offset carbon losses from increased disturbances?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2007, 363:2261-2269.
63. Kuzyakov Y., Friedel J.K., Stahr K. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2000, 32:1485-1498.
64. Laganière J., Paré D., Bradley R.L. Linking the abundance of aspen with soil faunal communities and rates of belowground processes within single stands of mixed aspen-black spruce. Applied Soil Ecology 2009, 41:19-28.
65. Laganière J., Paré D., Bradley R.L. How does a tree species influence litter decomposition? Separating the relative contribution of litter quality, litter mixing and forest floor conditions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2010, 40:465-475.
66. 2 emission from soil. Eurasian Soil Science 2006, 39:1127-1135.
67. Larocque G.R., Bhatti J.S., Gordon A.M., Luckai N., Wattenbach M., Liu J., et al. Chapter eighteen uncertainty and sensitivity issues in process-based models of carbon and nitrogen cycles in terrestrial ecosystems. Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment 2008, 3. pp. 307-327.
68. Légaré S., Bergeron Y., Paré D. Effect of aspen (Populus tremuloides) as a companion species on the growth of black spruce (Picea mariana) in the southwestern boreal forest of Quebec. Forest Ecology and Management 2005, 208(1-3):211-222.
69. Légaré S., Paré D., Bergeron Y. Influence of aspen on forest floor properties in black spruce-dominated stands. Plant and Soil 2005, 275(1-2):207-220.
70. Leites L.P., Robinson A.P., Rehfeldt G.E., Marshall J.D., Crookston N.L. Height-growth response to climatic changes differs among populations of Douglas-fir: a novel analysis of historic data. Ecological Applications: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America 2012, 22(1):154-165.
71. Leps J. Diversity and ecosystem function. Vegetation Ecology 2005, 199-237. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. E. Van Der Maarel (Ed.).
72. Linkosalo T., Häkkinen R., Terhivuo J., Tuomenvirta H., Hari P. The time series of flowering and leaf bud burst of boreal trees (1846-2005) support the direct temperature observations of climatic warming. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2009, 149:453-461.
73. Lopatin E., Kolström T., Spiecker H. Determination of forest growth trends in Komi Republic (northwest Russia): combination of tree-ring analysis and remote sensing data. Boreal Environment Research 2006, 11:341-353.
74. Loreau M., Hector A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 2001, 412:72-76.
75. Lousteau D., Bosc A., Colin A., Ogee J., Davi H., Francois C., et al. Modelling climate change effect on the potential production of French plains forests at the sub-regional level. Tree Physiology 2005, 25:813-823.
76. Lowe, J.A., 2005. IPCC DDC AR4 UKMO-HadGEM 20C3M run1. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB UKMO_HadGEM_20C3M_1. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=UKMO_HadGEM_20C3M_1.
77. Lowe, J.A., 2005. IPCC DDC AR4 UKMO-HadGEM SRESA1B run1. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB UKMO_HadGEM_SRESA1B_1. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=UKMO_HadGEM_SRESA1B_1.
78. Mäkipää R., Karjalainen T., Pussinen A., Kellomäki S. Effects of climate change and nitrogen deposition on the carbon sequestration of a forest ecosystem in the boreal zone. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1999, 29:1490-1501.
79. Mäkipää R., Linkosalo T., Niinimäki S., Komarov A.S., Bykhovets S.S., Tahvonen O., et al. How forest management and climate change affect the carbon sequestration of a Norway spruce stand. Journal of Forest Planning 2011, 16:1-15.
80. Martínez-Vilalta J., López B.C., Adell N., Badiella L., Ninyerola M. Twentieth century increase of Scots pine radial growth in NE Spain shows strong climate interactions. Global Change Biology 2008, 14(2):2868-2881.
81. Mielikäinen K. Manty-koivusekametsikoiden rakenne ja kehitys (Structure and development of mixed pine and birch stands). Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 1980, 99(3):1-82. (Finnish with English summary).
82. Mielikäinen K. Koivusekoituksen vaikutus kuusikon rakenteeseen ja kehitykseen (Effect of an admixture of birch on the structure and development of Norway spruce stands). Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 1985, 133:1-79. (Finnish with English summary).
83. Mikhailov A.V., Komarov A.S., Chertov O.G. Simulation of the carbon budget for different scenarios of forest management. Eurasian Soil Science 2004, 37(1):93-96.
84. Moore D.J.P., Aref S., Ho R.M., Pippen J.S., Hamilton J.G., De Lucia E.H. Annual basal area increment and growth duration of Pinus taeda in response to eight years of free-air carbon dioxide enrichment. Global Change Biology 2006, 12(8):1367-1377.
85. Morin X., Fahse L., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Bugmann H. Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species. Ecology Letters 2011, 14:1211-1219.
86. Myneni R.B., Keeling C.J., Tucker C., Asrar G., Nemani R.R. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 1997, 386:698-702.
87. Nabuurs G.-J., Pussinen A., Karjalainen T., Erhard M., Kramer K. Stemwood volume increment changes in European forests due to climate change - a simulation study with the EFISCEN model. Global Change Biology 2002, 8:304-316.
88. Nadporozhskaya M.A., Mohren G.M.J., Chertov O.G., Komarov A.S., Mikhailov A.V. Dynamics of soil organic matter in primary and secondary forest succession on sandy soils in the Netherlands: an application of the ROMUL model. Ecological Modelling 2006, 190(3-4):399-418.
89. 2-reduction) in birch litter. Scandinavian journal of forest research 1988, 3(1-4):17-23.
90. Overpeck J.T., Bartlein P.J., Webb T.I. Potential magnitude of future vegetation change in eastern North America: comparisons with the past. Science 1991, 254(5032):692-695.
91. Palosuo T., Peltoniemi M., Mikhailov A.V., Komarov A.S., Faubert P., Thürig E., et al. Projecting effects of intensified biomass extraction with alternative modelling approaches. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 255(5-6):1423-1433.
92. Palosuo T., Foereid B., Svensson M., Shurpali N., Lehtonen A., Herbst M., et al. A multi-model comparison of soil carbon assessment of a coniferous forest stand. Environmental Modelling & Software 2012, 35:38-49.
93. Peltoniemi M., Mäkipää R., Liski J., Tamminen P. Changes in soil carbon with stand age - an evaluation of a modeling method with empirical data. Global Change Biology 2004, 10:2078-2091.
94. Peltoniemi M., Thürig E., Ogle S., Palosuo T., Schrumpf M., Wutzler T., et al. Models in country scale carbon accounting of forest soils. Silva Fennica 2007, 41(3):575-602.
95. 3. Nature 2002, 420:403-407.
96. Prescott C.E., Zabek L.M., Staley C.L., Kabzems R. Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type and litter mixtures. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2000, 30:1742-1750.
97. Pukkala T. Methods to describe the competition process in a tree stand. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 1989, 4:187-202.
98. Rantakari M., Lehtonen A., Linkosalo T., Tuomi M., Tamminen P., Heikkinen J., et al. The Yasso07 soil carbon model - Testing against repeated soil carbon inventory. Forest Ecology and Management 2012, 286:137-147.
99. Rehfeldt G.E., Tchebakova N.M., Parfenova Ye.I., Wikoff W.R., Kuzmina N.A., Milyutin L.I. Intraspecific responces to climate in Pinus sylvestris. Global Change Biology 2002, 8:912-929.
100. Roeckner, E., 2005. IPCC DDC AR4 ECHAM5/MPI-OM 20C3M run1. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB EH5_MPI_OM_20C3M_1. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=EH5_MPI_OM_20C3M_1.
101. Roeckner, E., 2005. IPCC DDC AR4 ECHAM5/MPI-OM SRESA1B run1. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB EH5_MPI_OM_SRESA1B_1. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=EH5_MPI_OM_SRESA1B_1.
102. Rousi M., Possen B.J.H.M., Hagqvist R., Thomas B.R. From the Arctic Circle to the Canadian prairies - a case study of silver birch acclimation capacity. Silva Fennica 2012, 46(3):355-364.
103. Rustad L.E., Campbell J.L., Marion G.M., Norby R.J., Mitchell M.J., Hartley A.E., et al. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 2001, 126:543-562.
104. Schmid I., Kazda M. Root distribution of Norway spruce in monospecific and mixed stands on different soils. Forest Ecology and Management 2002, 159(1-2):37-47.
105. Shanin V.N., Komarov A.S., Mikhailov A.V., Bykhovets S.S. Modelling carbon and nitrogen dynamics in forest ecosystems of Central Russia under different climate change scenarios and forest management regimes. Ecological Modelling 2011, 222:2262-2275.
106. Shanin V.N., Komarov A.S., Bykhovets S.S. Simulation modelling for sustainable forest management: a case-study. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2012, 13:535-549.
107. Shaw C., Chertov O.G., Komarov A.S., Bhatti J., Nadporozskaya M.A., Apps M., et al. Application of the forest ecosystem model EFIMOD 2 to jack pine along the Boreal Forest Transect Case Study. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 2006, 86(2):171-185.
108. Shvidenko A.Z., Schepaschenko D.G., Nilsson S., Buluy Yu.I. Tables and Models of Growth and Productivity of Forests of Major Forest Forming Species of Northern Eurasia (Standard and Reference Materials) 2006, Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation, Federal Agency of Forest Management, Moscow, 886 pp.
109. Spiecker H. Growth trends in European forests - do we have sufficient knowledge?. Causes and Consequences of Accelerating Tree Growth in Europe 1999, vol. 27:157-169. European Forest Institute Proceedings.
110. Sterba H., Blab A., Katzensteiner K. Adapting as individual tree growth model for Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) in pure and mixed species stands. Forest Ecology and Management 2002, 159:101-110.
111. Strömgren M., Linder S. Effects of nutrition and soil warming on stemwood production in a boreal Norway spruce stand. Global Change Biology 2002, 8:1195-1204.
112. Strong W.L., La Roi G.H. Root-system morphology of common boreal forest trees in Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1983, 13:1164-1173.
113. Sykes M.T., Prentice I.C., Cramer W. A bioclimatic model for the potential distributions of north European tree species under present and future climates. Journal of Biogeography 1996, 23:203-233.
114. Talbot J.M., Allison S.D., Treseder K.K. Decomposers in disguise: mycorrhizal fungi as regulators of soil C dynamics in ecosystems under global change. Functional Ecology 2008, 22:955-963.
115. Tamminen P. Kangasmaan ravinnetunnusten ilmaiseminen ja viljavuuden alueellinen vaihtelu Etelä-Suomessa (Expression of soil nutrient status and regional variation in soil fertility of forested sites in southern Finland). Folia Forestalia 1991, 777:1-40. (Finnish with English summary).
116. Tchebakova N.M., Rehfeldt G.E., Parfenova E.I. Impacts of climate change on the distribution of Larix spp. and Pinus sylvestris and their climatypes in Siberia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2005, 11:861-882.
117. Thuiller W. Biodiversity: climate change and the ecologist. Nature 2007, 448:550-552.
118. Tomppo E. Models and methods for analyzing spatial pattern of trees. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 1986, 138:1-65.
119. Tselniker Ju.L. Fiziologicheskie osnovy tenevynoslivosti drevesnyh rastenij (Physiological Essential Principles of Shade-Tolerance of Trees) 1978, Nauka Publ., Moscow, 215 pp (In Russian).
120. Valentini R., Matteucci G., Dolman A.J., Schulze E.-D., Rebmann C., Moors E.J., et al. Respiration as the main determinat of carbon balance in European forests. Nature 2000, 404:861-865.
121. Venäläinen, A., Tuomenvirta, H., Pirinen, P., Drebs, A., 2005. A basic Finnish climate data set 1961-2000 - description and illustrations. Finnish Meteorological Institute, Reports No. 5.
122. Verkerk, P.J.H., 2004. Effects of silviculture on carbon sequestration. A case study in a boreal mixed-wood in Moscow Region, Russian Federation [dissertation]. Enviromental group, Wageningen.
123. Vesterdal L., Elberling B., Christiansen J.R., Callesen I., Schmidt I.K. Soil respiration and rates of soil carbon turnover differ among six common European tree species. Forest Ecology and Management 2012, 264:185-196.
124. Vetter M., Wirth C., Böttcher H., Churkina G., Schulze E.-D., Wutzler T., et al. Partitioning direct and indirect human-induced effects on carbon sequestration of managed coniferous forests using model simulations and forest inventories. Global Change Biology 2005, 11(5):810-827.
125. Walck J.L., Hidayati S.N., Dixon K.W., Thompson K., Poschlod P. Climate change and plant regeneration from seed. Global Change Biology 2011, 17:2145-2161.
126. Wardle D.A., Hörnberg G., Zackrisson O., Kalela-Brundin M., Coomes D.A. Long-term effects of wildfire on ecosystem properties across an island area gradient. Science 2003, 300:972-975.
127. Wegner, J., 2007. IPCC DDC AR4 ECHAM5/MPI-OM 20C3M run2. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB EH5_MPI_OM_20C3M_2. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=EH5_MPI_OM_20C3M_2.
128. Wegner, J., 2007. IPCC DDC AR4 ECHAM5/MPI-OM SRESA1B run2. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB EH5_MPI_OM_SRESA1B_2. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=EH5_MPI_OM_SRESA1B_2.
129. Wegner, J., 2007. IPCC DDC AR4 ECHAM5/MPI-OM 20C3M run3. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB EH5_MPI_OM_20C3M_3. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=EH5_MPI_OM_20C3M_3.
130. Wegner, J., 2007. IPCC DDC AR4 ECHAM5/MPI-OM SRESA1B run3. World Data Center for Climate. CERA-DB EH5_MPI_OM_SRESA1B_3. Retrieved from http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/ui/Compact.jsp?acronym=EH5_MPI_OM_SRESA1B_3.
131. Yurova A. Yu., Volodin E.M., Ågren G., Chertov O.G., Komarov A.S. Effects of variations in simulated changes in soil carbon contents and dynamics on future climate projections. Global Change Biology 2010, 16:823-835.
132. Zhao D., Borders B., Wilson M., Rathbun S.L. Modeling neighborhood effects on the growth and survival of individual trees in a natural temperate species-rich forest. Ecological Modelling 2006, 196:90-102.
133. Zimmermann N.E., Yoccoz N.G., Edwards T.C., Meier E.S., Thuiller W., Guisan A., et al. Climatic extremes improve predictions of spatial patterns of tree species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106(2):19723-19728.
134. th century). Lesovedenie (Russian Forest Science) 2011, 6:86-93. (Russian with English summary).