EFIMOD 2 - A model of growth and cycling of elements in boreal forest ecosystems

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 170, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 373-392

  Komarov, A ^a   Chertov, O ^b   Zudin, S ^a,c   Nadporozhskaya, M ^b   Mikhailov, A ^a   Bykhovets, S ^a   Zudina, E ^c   Zoubkova, E ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN SOIL SCIENCE   (Russian Federation)

^b ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c EUROPEAN FOREST INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^d Department of Forestry Informatization   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Carbon and nitrogen balance; Element cycles; Forest and soil dynamics; Individual based model

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FOREST; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GROWTH; NUTRIENT CYCLING;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

ABIES; BETULA; BETULA PENDULA; PICEA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0347567377     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00240-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Aerts, R., 1996. Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J. Ecol. 84, 597-608.
2. Ågren, G., 1983. Nitrogen productivity of some conifers. Can. J. Forest Res. 13, 494-500.
3. Ågren, G., Axelsson, B., 1979. Annual carbon budget for Scots Pine. In: Linder, S. (Ed.), Understanding and Predicting Tree Growth. Swedish Conifer Forest Project Technical Report, vol. 25. pp. 145-155.
4. Ågren, G.I., Bosatta, E., 1996. Theoretical Ecosystem Ecology - Understanding Element Cycles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Ågren, G.I., McMurtrie, R.E., Parton, W.J., Pastor, J., Shugart, H.H., 1991. State of the art of models of production decomposition linkages in conifer and grassland ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 1, 118-138.
6. Alexandrova, L.N., 1970. Sources of humic substances in soil. Trans. Leningrad Agric. Inst. 142, 5-25 (in Russian).
7. Alexeev, V.A., 1975. The Light Regime of Forest. Nauka, Leningrad, 228 pp. (in Russian).
8. Battaglia, M., Sands, P.J., 1998. Process-based forest productivity models and their application to forest management. Forest Ecol. Manag. 102, 13-32.
9. Botkin, D.B., Janak, J.F., Wallis, J.R., 1972. Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol. 60, 849-872.
10. Bykhovets, S.S., Komarov, A.S., 2002. A simple statistical model of soil climate with a monthly step. Eurasian Soil Sci. 35, 392-400.
11. Chertov, O.G., 1981. Ecology of Forest Lands. Nauka, Leningrad. 192 pp. (in Russian).
12. Chertov, O.G., 1983a. The mathematical model of single plant ecosystem. J. Obshchey Biol. (J. Fundam. Biol. Moscow) 44, 406-414 (in Russian with English summary).
13. Chertov, O.G., 1983b. Quantitative approach to species ecological parameters with special reference to Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L., Pinaceae). Botanichesky J. (Leningrad) 68, 1318-1324 (in Russian with English summary).
14. Chertov, O.G., 1985. Simulation model of forest litter and floor mineralization and humification. J. Gen. Biol. Moscow 46, 794-804 (in Russian with English summary).
15. Chertov, O.G., 1990. SPECOM - a single tree model of pine stand/raw humus soil ecosystem. Ecol. Model. 50, 107-132.
16. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., 1997. SOMM: a model of soil organic matter dynamics. Ecol. Model. 94, 177-189.
17. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., Karev, G.P., 1999a. Modern Approaches in Forest Ecosystem Modelling. European Forest Institute Research Report No. 8. Koln. Brill, Leiden, Boston, 130 pp.
18. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., Tsiplianovsky, A.M., 1999b. A combined simulation model of Scots pine, Norway spruce and Silver birch ecosystems in the European boreal zone. Forest Ecol. Manag. 116, 189-206.
19. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., Tsiplianovsky, A.M., 1999c. Simulation of soil organic matter and nitrogen accumulation in Scots pine plantations on bare parent material using forest combined model EFIMOD. Plant Soil 213, 31-41.
20. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., Nadporozhskaya, M.A., Bykhovets, S.S., Zudin, S.L., 2001. ROMUL - model of forest soil organic matter dynamics as a substantial tool for forest ecosystem modelling. Ecol. Model. 138, 289-308.
21. Duchaufour, Ph., 1961. Precis de pedologie. Paris.
22. Karpov, V.G., 1969. The Experimental Phytocoenology of Dark Coniferous Taiga. Nauka, Leningrad, 350 pp.
23. Kazimirov, N.I., Morozova, R.M., 1973. The Biological Cycle of Elements in Carelian Spruce Forests. Nauka, Leningrad, 176 pp. (in Russian).
24. Kazimirov, N.I., Volkov, A.D., Ziabchenko, S.S., Ivanchikov, A.A., Morozova, R.M., 1977. The Cycle of Elements and Energy in Pine Forests of Russian European North. Nauka, Leningrad. 304 pp. (in Russian).
25. Kazimirov, N.I., Morozova, R.M., Kulikova, V.K., 1978. The Biomass and Elements Cycle in Birch Forests of Central Taiga. Nauka, Leningrad. 216 pp. (in Russian).
26. Kellomäki, S., Väisänen, H., Hänninen, H., Kolström, T., Lauhanen, R., Mattila, U., Pajari, B., 1992. SIMA: a model for forest succession based on the carbon and nitrogen cycles with application to silvicultural management of the forest ecosystem. Silva Carelica 22, 1-85.
27. Kellomäki, S., Väisänen, H., Strandman, H., 1993. FinnFor: A Model for Calculating the Response of the Boreal Forest Ecosystem to Climate Changes. Research Note No. 6. Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland, 120 pp.
28. Killingbeck, K.T., 1996. Nutrients in senescent leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption proficiency. Ecology 77 (6), 1716-1727.
29. Komarov, A.S., 1980. Markov fields and plant communities. In: Dobrushin, R.L. (Ed.), Interactive Markov Processes and Their Applications to Multicomponent Systems. Pushchino, pp. 7-21 (in Russian).
30. Kostin, N.V., 1997. Geographic variability of productivity of Norway spruce stands in European forest zone. The Candidate Thesis. St. Petersburg Forest Technical Academy.
31. Kubin, E., 1983. Nutrients in the soil, ground vegetation and tree layer in an old spruce forest in Northern Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 20, 361-390.
32. Liebig, J.V., 1843. Die Chemie in ihrer Aswendung auf Agricultur und Physiologie. 5. Aufl. Braunshweig.
33. Liu, J., Ashton, P.S., 1995. Individual-based simulation models for forest succession and management. Forest Ecol. Manag. 73, 157-175.
34. Mälkönen, E., 1974. Annual primary production and nutrient cycles in some Scots pine stands. Comm. Inst. Forest Fenn. 84 (5), 1-82.
35. Mälkönen, E., 1977. Annual primary production and nutrient cycle in a birch stand. Comm. Inst. Forest Fenn. 91 (5), 1-28.
36. Marklund, L.G., 1988. Biomassafunktioner for tall, gran och bjork i Sverige (Summary: Biomass Functions for Pine, Spruce and Birch in Sweden). Report 45. Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, p. 73 (in Swedish with English summary).
37. Mikhailov, A.V., 2002. The model of biomass dynamics of forest ground vegetation. In: Proc. 8th Int. Conf. "Mathematics, Computers, Education". Moscow, pp. 37-43.
38. Paal, J.L., Oja, T.A., Kolodyazhnyi, S.F., 1989. Taxon and Time Continuum of Vegetation. Tallinn, 187 pp. (in Russian).
39. Pacala, S., Deutschman, D., 1995. Details from matter: the spatial distribution of individual trees maintains forest ecosystem function. OIKOS 74, 357-365.
40. Prentice, I.C., Helmisaari, H., 1991. Silvics of North European trees: compilation, comparisons and implications for forest succession modelling. Forest Ecol. Manag. 42, 79-93.
41. Ryan, M.G., Hunt Jr., E.R., McMurtrie, R.E., Agren, G.I., Aber, J.D., Friend, A.D., Rastetter, E.B., Pullia, W.M., Raison, R.J., Linder, S., 1996. Comparing models of ecosystem function for temperate conifer forests. I. Model descriptions and validation. In: Breymeyer, A.I., Hall, D.O., Melillo, J.M., Agren, G.I. (Eds.), SCOPE 56-Global Change: Effects on Coniferous Forests and Grasslands. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 313-362.
42. Smirnova, O.V., Chistyakova, A.A., Zaugolnova, L.B., Evstigneev, O.I., Popadiouk, R.V., Romanovsky, A.M., 1999. Ontogeny of tree. Bot. Zh. (Bot. J. St. Petersburg) 12, 8-20.
43. Smith, P., Smith, J.U., Powlson, D.S., McGill, W.B., Arah, J.R.M., Chertov, O.G., Coleman, K., Franko, U., Frolking, S., Jenkinson, D.S., Jensen, L.S., Kelly, R.H., Klein-Gunnewiek, H., Komarov, A.S., Li, C., Molina, J.A.E., Mueller, T., Parton, W.J., Thornley, J.H.M., Whitmore, A.P., 1997. A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma 81, 153-225.
44. Tiktak, A., Van Grinsven, H.J.M., 1995. Review of sixteen forest-soil-atmospheric models. Ecol. Model. 83, 35-53.
45. Tselniker, J.L., 1978. The Physiological Basis of Trees Shade-Tolerance. Nauka, Moscow. 215 pp. (in Russian).
46. Vitousek, P., 1982. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am. Nat. 119 (4), 553-572.
47. Wilde, S.A., 1958. Forest Soils. Wiley, New York.