Explorations Into Pedagogy Within Mathematics Classrooms: Insights From Contemporary Inquiries

Curriculum Inquiry

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 71-94

  Walshaw, Margaret ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872654535     PISSN: 03626784     EISSN: 1467873X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/curi.12004     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Appelbaum, P. (2008). Embracing mathematics: On becoming a teacher and changing with mathematics. New York: Routledge.
2. Apple, M. (1995). Taking power seriously: New directions in equity in mathematics education and beyond. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 329-348). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Badiou, A. (2009). Theory of the subject. London: Continuum.
4. th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
5. Bibby, T. (2010). What does it mean to characterize mathematics as 'masculine'? Bringing a psychoanalytic lens to bear on the teaching and learning of mathematics. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 21-41). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
6. Black, L., Mendick, H., & Solomon, Y. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. London: Routledge.
7. Brown, T. (Ed.). (2008). The psychology of mathematics education: A psychoanalytic displacement. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
8. Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (2011). Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
9. Brown, T., & Walshaw, M. (2012). Mathematics education and contemporary theory: Guest editorial. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 1-8.
10. Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Clements, M. A., Keitel, C., Bishop, A. J., Kilpatrick, J., & Leung, F. (2012). From the few to the many: Historical perspectives on who should learn mathematics. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 10-44). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
12. Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 87-103.
13. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
14. de Freitas, E. (2010). Regulating mathematics classroom discourse: Text, context, and intertextuality. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 129-151). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
15. de Freitas, E., & Nolan, K. (Eds.). (2008). Opening the research text: Critical insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
16. Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy (R. Hurley, Trans.). San Francisco: City Light Books. (Original work published 1981)
17. Deleuze, G. (1990).The logic of sense (M. Lester, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Dienes, Z. P. (1960). Building up mathematics. London: Hutchinson Educational.
19. Dienes, Z. P. (1963). An experimental study of mathematics learning. London: Hutchinson.
20. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse of language (A. S. Smith, Trans.). London: Pantheon.
21. Foucault, M. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (D. Bouchard & S. Simon, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (C. Gordon etal., Trans.) New York: Pantheon.
23. Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse (R. Young, Trans.). London: Routledge.
24. Foucault, M. (1984). The care of the self (R. Hurley, Trans.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
25. Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things. New York: Vintage.
26. Gagné, R. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
27. García, M., Sánchez, V., & Escudero, I. (2006). Learning through reflection in mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 1-17.
28. Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
29. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2004). Establishing a community of practice in a secondary mathematics classroom. In B. Allen & S. Johnston-Wilder (Eds.), Mathematics education: Exploring the culture of learning (pp. 91-116). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
30. Hanley, U. (2010). Teachers and curriculum change: Working to get it right. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 3-19). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
31. Hardy, T. (2009). What does a discourse-oriented examination have to offer teacher development? The problem with primary mathematics teachers. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp.185-197). London: Routledge.
32. Jablonka, E., Wagner, D., & Walshaw, M. (in press). Theories for studying social, political and cultural dimensions of mathematics education. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook on mathematics education. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
33. Lacan, J. (1977). The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. London: Hogarth.
34. Lampert, M., &. Blunk, M. (Eds.). (1998). Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Lave, J. (1996). Teaching as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3(3), 149-164.
36. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Leikin, R., & Rota, S. (2006). Learning through teaching: A case study on the development of a mathematics teacher's proficiency in managing an inquiry-based classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 44-68.
38. Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19-44). Westport, CT: Ablex.
39. Lerman, S. (2009). Pedagogy, discourse, and identity. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 147-155). London: Routledge.
40. Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
41. Mendick, H., Moreau, M.-P., & Epstein, D. (2009). Special cases: Neoliberalism, choice, and mathematics. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 71-82). London: Routledge.
42. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
43. Morgan, C. (2009). Questioning the mathematics curriculum: A discursive approach. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 97-106). London: Routledge.
44. Nolan, K. (2010). Playing the field(s) of mathematics education: A teacher educator's journey into pedagogical and paradoxical possibilities. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 153-173). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
45. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Eds.), Discourse, learning and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Popkewitz, T. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 3-34.
48. Radford, L. (2012). Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 101-118.
49. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
50. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Sfard, A. (2003). Balancing the unbalanceable: The NCTM Standards in light of theories of learning mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, W. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 353-392). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
52. Sierpinska, A., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (1998). Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
53. Spinoza, B. (2000). Spinoza: Ethics (G. H. R. Parkinson, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
54. von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Aspects of radical constructivism and its educational recommendations. In L. P. Steffe & P. Nesher (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 307-314). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Walls, F. (2010). The good mathematics teacher: Standardized mathematics tests, teacher identity, and pedagogy. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 65-83). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
56. Walshaw, M. (2001). A Foucauldian gaze on gender research: What do you do when confronted with the tunnel at the end of the light? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 471-492.
57. Walshaw, M. (Ed.). (2004). Mathematics education within the postmodern. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
58. Walshaw, M. (2007). Working with Foucault in education. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
59. Walshaw, M. (2010a). Learning to teach: Powerful practices at work during the practicum. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogy: New perspectives for mathematics classrooms (pp. 109-128). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
60. Walshaw, M. (2010b). Mathematics pedagogical change: Rethinking identity and reflective practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(6), 487-497.
61. Walshaw, M. (2010c). Poststructuralism and ethical practical action: Issues of identity and power. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 1-19.
62. Walshaw, M., & Brown, T. (2012). Affective productions of mathematical experience. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1/2), 185-199.
63. Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1990). The development of collaborative dialogue in small group interactions. In L. P. Steffe & T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming early childhood mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 244-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
65. Žižek, S. (Ed.). (1998). Cogito and the unconscious. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.