Lexical Processing and Sentence Context Effects

Handbook of Psycholinguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 377-401

  Morris, Robin K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872561940     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50011-0     Document Type: Chapter

References (109)

1. J. Altarriba, J.F. Kroll, A. Sholl and K. Rayner (1996) The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition 24(4), 477-492.
2. S. Andrews, B. Miller and K. Rayner (2004) Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16 285-311.
3. D.A. Balota, A. Pollatsek and K. Rayner (1985) The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology 17 364-390.
4. D.A. Balota, J.M. Watson, J.M. Duchek and F.R. Ferraro (1999) Cross-modal semantic and homography priming in health young, healthy old, and in Alzheimer's disease individuals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 5 626-640.
5. R. Bertram and J. Hyönä (2003) The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 48 615-634.
6. R. Bertram, A. Pollatsek and J. Hyönä (2004) Morphological parsing and the use of segmentation cues in reading Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 51 325-345.
7. K.S. Binder (2003) Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: An eye-movement examination. Memory and Cognition 31 690-702.
8. K.S. Binder and R.K. Morris (1995) Eye movements and lexical, ambiguity resolution: Effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 1186-1196.
9. K.S. Binder, A. Pollatsek and K. Rayner (1999) Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25(4), 1162-1172.
10. K.S. Binder and K. Rayner (1998) Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5 271-276.
11. C. Burgess and G. Simpson (1988) Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings. Brain and Language 33 86-103.
12. P.A. Carpenter and M.A. Just (1983) What your eyes do while your mind is reading. K. Rayner (Eds) Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes New York: Academic Press 275-307.
13. P. Carooll and M.L. Slowiaczek (1986) Constraints on semantic priming in reading: A fixation time analysis. Memory & Cognition 14(6), 509-522.
14. A. Deutsch, R. Frost, S. Pelleg, A. Pollatsek and K. Rayner (2003) Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10 415-422.
15. A. Deutsch, R. Frost, A. Pollatsek and K. Rayner (2005) Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew. Language and Cognitive Processes 20 341-371.
16. S. Dopkins, R.K. Morris and K. Rayner (1992) Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 31 461-477.
17. S.A. Duffy, J.M. Henderson and R.K. Morris (1989) Semantic facilitation of lexical access during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(5), 791-801.
18. S.A. Duffy, G. Kambe and K. Rayner (2001) The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. D.S. Gorfein (Eds) On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Decade of behavior Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 27-43.
19. S.A. Duffy, R.K. Morris and K. Rayner (1988) Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 27 429-446.
20. S.F. Ehrlich and K. Rayner (1981) Contextual effects of word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20 641-655.
21. I. Fischler and P.A. Bloom (1979) Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 1-20.
22. I. Fischler and P.A. Bloom (1980) Memory and Cognition 8 216-225.
23. J.A. Fodor (1983) Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
24. J.R. Folk (1999) Phonological codes are used to access the lexicon during silent reading Folk, Jocelyn R. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 892-906.
25. J.R. Folk and R.K. Morris (1995) Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 1412-1429.
26. D.J. Foss (1982) A discourse on semantic priming. Cognitive Psychology 14 590-607.
27. D.J. Foss and J.R. Ross (1983) Great expectations: Context effects during sentence processing. G. Flores D'Arcais, R.J. Jarvella (Eds) The Process of Language Understanding Chichester, England: Wiley 169-191.
28. C.A. Fowler, S.E. Napps and L. Feldman (1985) Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition 13 241-255.
29. L. Frazier and K. Rayner (1987) Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambigous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 26 505-526.
30. S. Frisson, K. Rayner and M.J. Pickering (2005) Effects of Contextual Predictability and Transitional Probability on Eye Movements During Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(5), 862-877.
31. M.A. Gernsbacher (1984) Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 256-281.
32. M.A. Gernsbacher (1990) Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33. M.A. Gernsbacher and M. Faust (1995) Skilled suppression. F.N. Dempster, C.J. Brainerd (Eds) Interference and inhibition in cognition San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc. 295-327.
34. M.A. Gernsbacher, R.W. Robertson and N.K. Werner (2001) The costs and benefits of meaning. D.S. Gorfein, S. David (Eds) On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Decade of behavior Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 119-137.
35. D.S. Gorfein (2001) An activation-selection view of homograph disambiguation: A matter of emphasis? D.S. Gorfein (Eds) On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Decade of behavior Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 157-173.
36. S.N. Greenberg, A.F. Healy and A. Koriat (2004) The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 428-433.
37. K. Haberlandt and A.C. Graesser (1989) Buffering new information during reading. Discourse Processes 12 479-494.
38. A.F. Healy (1994) Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1 333-344.
39. D.J. Hess, D.J. Foss and P. Carroll (1995) Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124 62-82.
40. V.M. Holmes and J.K. O'Regan (1981) Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative-clause sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20 417-430.
41. A. Inhoff (1989) Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 544-555.
42. A. Inhoff (1989) Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? Journal of Memory and Language 28 444-461. Both of these Inhoffs possible based on reference in text
43. A.W. Inhoff (1984) Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 23(5), 612-624.
44. A.W. Inhoff and K. Rayner (1986) Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception and Psychophysics 40 431-439.
45. B. Juhasz (2005) Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Word and Picture Identification Juhasz, Barbara J. Psychological Bulletin 131 684-712.
46. B. Juhasz and K. Rayner (2003) Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 1312-1318.
47. B.J. Juhasz, M.S. Starr and A.W. Inhoff (2003) The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology 94 223-244.
48. G. Kambe (2004) Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing. Perception and Psychophysics 66 279-292.
49. G. Kambe, K. Rayner and S.A. Duffy (2001) Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Memory and Cognition 29 363-372.
50. A. Kawamoto (1993) Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Memory and Language 32 474-516.
51. A.H. Kawamoto and J.H. Zemblidge (1992) Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory and Language 31 349-374.
52. G. Kellas and H. Vu (1999) Strength of context does modulate the subordinate bias effect: A reply to Binder and Rayner. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6 511-517.
53. A. Koriat and S.N. Greenberg (1994) The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1 345-356.
54. F. Lavigne, F. Vitu and G. d'Y dewalle (2000) The influence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words. Acta Psychologica 104(2), 191-214.
55. S. Lima (1987) Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language 26 84-99.
56. C. Martin, H. Vu, G. Kellas and K. Metcalf (1999) Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A 813-839.
57. M.E. Masson (1986) Comprehension of rapidly presented sentences: The mind is quicker than the eye. Journal of Memory and Language 25(5), 588-604.
58. J.L. McClelland (1987) The case of interactionism in language processing. M. Coltheart (Eds) Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 3-36.
59. D.E. Meyer and R.W. Schvaneveldt (1976) Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes. Science 192(4234), 27-33.
60. R.K. Morris (1994) Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 20 92-103.
61. R.K. Morris and K.S. Binder (2001) What happens to the unselected meaning of an ambiguous word in skilled reading? D.S. Gorfein (Eds) On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Decade of behavior Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 139-153.
62. R.K. Morris and K.S. Binder (2002) What happens to the unselected meaning of an ambiguous word in skilled reading? D.S. Gorfein (Eds) On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 139-153.
63. R.K. Morris and J.R. Folk (1998) Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading. Memory & Cognition 26 1313-1322.
64. J. Morton (1964) The effects of context on the visual duration threshold for words. British Journal of Psychology 55 165-180.
65. W.T. Neill and L.A. Valdes (1996) Facilitatory and inhibitory aspects of attention. A.F. Kramer, M.G.H. Coles, G.D. Logan (Eds) Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 77-106.
66. E. Niswander, A. Pollatsek and K. Rayner (2000) The process of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language and Cognitive Processes 15 389-420.
67. W. Onifer and D.A. Swinney (1981) Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning, and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition 9 225-236.
68. J. O'Regan (1979) Eye guidance in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics 25 501-509.
69. J.K. O'Regan (1980) The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control. Perception and Psychophysics 28 112-117.
70. J.K. O'Regan (1992) Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Special Issue: Object perception and scene analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychology 46 461-488.
71. A. Pollatsek, J. Hyönä and R. Bertram (2000) The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 820-833.
72. K. Rayner, J. Ashby, A. Pollatsek and E.D. Reichle (2004) The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception, and Performance 30(4), 720-732.
73. K. Rayner and S.A. Duffy (1986) Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition 14 191-201.
74. K. Rayner and L. Frazier (1989) Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15 779-790.
75. K. Rayner and G. McConkie (1976) What guides a reader's eye movements? Vision Research 16 829-837.
76. K. Rayner, J.M. Pacht and S.A. Duffy (1994) Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words:, Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Memory and Language 33 527-544.
77. K. Rayner, A. Pollatsek and K. Binder (1998) Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 476-497.
78. K. Rayner, S.C. Sereno and G.E. Raney (1996) Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 1188-1200.
79. K. Rayner and M.L. Slowiaczek (1981) Expectations and parafoveal information in reading: Comments on McClelland and O'Regan. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7(3), 645-651.
80. K. Rayner and A.D. Well (1996) Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychomomic Bulletin and Review 3 504-509.
81. E.D. Reichle, A. Pollatsek, D.L. Fisher and K. Rayner (1998) Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 105 125-157.
82. H.E.H. Schilling, K. Rayner and J.I. Chumbley (1998) Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word, frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition 26(4), 1270-1281.
83. A.R. Schmauder, R.K. Morris and D.V. Poynor (2000) Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: Evidence from priming and eye fixations. Memory and Cognition 28 1098-1108.
84. R.E. Schuberth, K.T. Spoehr and D.M. Lane (1981) Effects of stimulus and contextual information on the lexical decision process. Memory and Cognition 9 68-77.
85. M.S. Seidenberg, M.K. Tanenhaus, J.M. Leiman and M. Bienkowski (1982) Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology 14 489-537.
86. S.C. Sereno, P.J. O'Donnell and K. Rayner (2006) Eye Movements and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Investigating the Subordinate-Bias Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 335-350.
87. S.C. Sereno, J.M. Pacht and K. Rayner (1992) The effect of meaning frequency on processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Psychological Science 3 296-300.
88. S.C. Sereno and K. Rayner (1992) Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18 173-184.
89. A.J. Sharkey and N.E. Sharkey (1992) Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming. Journal of Memory and Language 31(4), 543-572.
90. N.E. Sharkey and D.C. Mitchell (1984) Word recognition in a functional context: The use of scripts in reading. Journal of Memory and Language 24(2), 253-270.
91. G.B. Simpson (1981) Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior 20 120-136.
92. G.B. Simpson (1994) Context and the processing of ambiguous words. M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds) Handbook of psycholinguistics San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc 359-374.
93. G.B. Simpson and A.C. Adamopoulos (2001) Repeated homographs in word and sentence contexts: Multiple processing of multiple meanings. D.S. Gorfein (Eds) On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. Decade of behavior Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 105-117.
94. G.B. Simpson and C. Burgess (1985) Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 28-39.
95. G.B. Simpson and H. Kang (1994) Inhibitory processes in the recognition of homograph meanings. D. Dagenbach, T.H. Carr (Eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc 359-381.
96. G.B. Simpson and M.A. Kreuger (1991) Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language 30 627-643.
97. G.B. Simpson, R.R. Peterson, M.A. Casteel and C. Burgess (1989) Lexical and sentence context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15(1), 88-97.
98. M.L. Slowiaczek and K. Rayner (1987) Sequential masking during eye fixations in reading. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25(3), 175-178.
99. D.A. Swinney (1979) Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 645-659.
100. P. Tabossi, L. Colombo and R. Job (1987) Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance. Psychological Research 49 161-167.
101. P. Tabossi and S. Sbisa (2001) Methodological issues in the study of lexical ambiguity resolution. D.S. Gorfein (Eds) (2001). On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity: Decade of behavior Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 11-26.
102. M. Taft and K.I. Forster (1976) Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15 607-620.
103. E. Tulving and C. Gold (1963) Stimulus information and contextual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 319-327.
104. E. Tulving, G. Mandler and R. Baumal (1964) Interaction of two sources of information in tachistoscopic word recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology 18 62-71.
105. L.C. Twilley and P. Dixon (2000) Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7 49-81.
106. S.J. White, K. Rayner and S.P. Liversedge (2005) Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Special Issue: Memory strength and recency judgments 12(5), 891-896.
107. J. Wiley and K. Rayner (2000) Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory and Cognition 28 1011-1021.
108. R.S. Williams and R.K. Morris (2004) Eye movements, word familiarity, and word acquisition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16 312-339.
109. D. Zola (1984) Redundancy and word perception during reading. Perception & Psychophysics 36(3), 277-284.