Finding transactive contributions in whole group classroom discussions

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 976-983

  Ai, Hua ^a   Sionti, Marietta ^a   Wang, Yi Chia ^a   Rosé, Carolyn Penstein ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Automatic text processing techniques; Classroom discourse; Corpus analysis

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT; AUTOMATIC TEXT PROCESSING; CLASSROOM DISCOURSE; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; CORPUS ANALYSIS; TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT;

DATA MINING; TEACHING; TEXT PROCESSING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84872278740     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Arguello, J. & Rosé, C. P. (2006). Topic Segmentation of Dialogue, Proceedings of the NAACL Workshop on Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech.
2. Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2, 202-221.
3. Berkowitz, M., & Gibbs, J. (1983). Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 399-410.
4. Cakir, M., Xhafa, F., Zhou, N., & Stahl, G. (2005). Thread-based analysis of patterns of collaborative interaction in chat. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AI-Ed 2005), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 120-127.
5. Chapin, S., O'Connor, C., & Anderson, N. (2003). Classroom Discussions: Using Math Talk to Help Students Learn, Math Solutions Publications: Sausalito, CA.
6. Erkens, G., & Janssen, J. (2006). Automatic coding of communication in collaboration protocols. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (vol. 2, (pp. 1063-1064)). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Foltz, P., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 285-308.
8. Gweon, G., Rosé, C. P., Albright, E., Cui, Y. (2007). Evaluating the Effect of Feedback from a CSCL Problem Solving Environment on Learning, Interaction, and Perceived Interdependence, Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning
9. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. & Barrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and Strategies of a Problem-based Learning Facilitator. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning, 1(1), pp 21-39.
10. Joshi, M. & Rose, C. P. (2007). Using transactivity in conversation summarization in educational dialog. Proceedings of the SLaTE Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education.
11. Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C, Joshi, M., Robinson, A. (2007). Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support, Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education
12. Kumar, R., Chaudhuri, S., Howley, L, Rosé, C. P. (2009). VMT-Basilica: An Environment for Rapid Prototyping of Collaborative Learning Environments with Dynamic Support, Community Event Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning
13. Nathan, M., Kim, S., & Grant, T. (2009). Instituting Change in Classroom Discourse Structure: Human and Computer-Based Motif Analysis, Working Paper number 2009-1, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, School of Education, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
14. Michaels, S., OGonnor, C, & Resnick, L.B. (2007). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education.
15. OGonnor, M.C., Michaels, S., & Chapin, S. (2007). Small-scale experimental studies of classroom talk: Seeking local effects in discourse-intensive instruction. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
16. Piaget, J. The equilibrium of cognitive structures: the central problem of intellectual development, Chicago University Press, 1985.
17. Resnick, L. B., Bill, V., & Lesgold, S. (1992). Developing thinking abilities in arithmetic class. In A. Demetriou, M. Shayer, & A. Efklides (Eds.), Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Implications and applications for education (pp. 210-230). London: Routledge.
18. Resnick, L.B., Michaels, S., & O'Connor, C. (in press). How (well structured) talk builds the mind. In R. Sternberg & D. Preiss (Eds.), From Genes to Context: New Discoveries about Learning from Educational Research and Their Applications. New York: Springer.
19. Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y.C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K, Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., (2008). Analyzing Collaborative Learning Processes Automatically: Exploiting the Advances of Computational Linguistics in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 3(3), pp237-271.
20. Schwartz, D. (1998). The productive agency that drives collaborative learning. In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.) Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. NY: Elsevier Science/Permagon.
21. Sionti, M., Ai, H., Rosé, C. P., and Resnick, L., A Framework for Analyzing Development of Argumentation through Classroom Discussions, in Niels Pinkwart & Bruce McClaren (Eds.) Educational Technologies for Teaching Argumentation Skills, Bentham Science.
22. Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2000). Modeling the Process of Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of the International Workshop on New Technologies in Collaborative Learning. Japan: Awaiji-Yumebutai.
23. Stahl, G. (2006c). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/mit/.
24. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for inter-subjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315-337.
25. Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo & B. Bürge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361-384). Berlin: Springer.
26. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Wang, H. C, Rosé, C.P., Cui, Y., Chang, C. Y, Huang, C. C, Li, T. Y. (2007). Thinking Hard Together: The Long and Short of Collaborative Idea Generation for Scientific Inquiry, Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning
28. Webb, N, Nemer, K, & Zuniga, S. (2002). Short Circuits or Superconductors? Effects of Group Composition on High Achieving Students. Science Assessment Performance, American Educational Research Journal 39(4), pp943-989.
29. Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education.
30. Witten, I. H. & Frank, E. (2005). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, second edition, Elsevier: San Francisco.