Thinking hard together: The long and short of collaborative idea generation in scientific inquiry

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 753-762

  Wang, Hao Chuan ^a   Rosé, Carolyn P ^a   Cui, Yue ^a   Chang, Chun Yen ^b   Huang, Chun Chieh ^c   Li, Tsai Yen ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED; COGNITIVE PROCESS; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; IDEA GENERATION; INQUIRY LEARNING; POST TEST; PRODUCTIVITY GAIN; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY; SHORT TERM PROCESS;

PRODUCTIVITY;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84861019695     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R., Kulik, C., Kulik, J., & Morgan, M. (1991). The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events, Review of Educational Research, 61(2), pp 213-238.
2. Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 11(6), 208-212.
3. Chang, C., & Weng, Y. (2002). An exploratory study on students' problem-solving ability in earth science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5). 441-451.
4. Chang C., & Tsai, C. (2005). The interplay between different forms of CAI and students' preferences of learning environment in the secondary science class. Science Education, 89, 707-724.
5. Chang, C., Barufaldi, J. P., Lin, M., Chen, Y. (in press). Assessing tenth-grade students' problem solving ability in the area of Earth sciences. Computers in Human Behavior.
6. Chi, M. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-488.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Ed.. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53(3), 497-509.
9. Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 79(5), 722-735.
10. Hill, G. W. (1982). Group versus individual performance: are N+1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 517-539.
11. Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 186-213.
12. Wang, H., Li, T., Huang, C., Chang, C., Rosé, C. P. (2006). VIBRANT: A brainstorming agent for computer supported creative problem solving, Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference (ITS 2006).
13. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33 (1), 1-30.