Thread-based analysis of patterns of collaborative interaction in chat

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 125, Issue , 2005, Pages 120-127

  Cakir, Murat ^a   Xhafa, Fatos ^a   Zhou, Nan ^a   Stahl, Gerry ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE ACTIVITIES; COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENTS; COLLABORATIVE INTERACTION; COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; IMPORTANT FEATURES; MATH PROBLEM SOLVING; MODEL-BASED OPC; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 85139062664     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Stahl, G. (2006). Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Soller, A., and Lesgold, A. (2003) A computational approach to analyzing online knowledge sharing interaction. Proceedings of AI in Education 2003, Sydney, Australia, 253-260.
3. Garcia, A., and Jacobs, J.B. (1998). The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom. Qualitative Sociology, 21(3), 299-317.
4. O'Neil, J., and Martin, D. (2003). Text chat in action. Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 40-49.
5. Smith, M., Cadiz, J., and Burkhalter, B. (2000) Conversation Trees and Threaded Chats, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 97-105.
6. Popolov, D., Callaghan, M., and Luker, P. (2000). Conversation Space: Visualising Multi-threaded Conversation. Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, Palermo,Italy,246-249
7. King, F.B., and Mayall, H.J. (2001) Asynchronous Distributed Problem-based Learning, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'01), 157-159.
8. Tay, M.H., Hooi, C.M., and Chee, Y.S. (2002) Discourse-based Learning using a Multimedia Discussion Forum. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE'02), IEEE, 293.
9. Venolia, G.D. and Neustaedter, C. (2003) Understanding Sequence and Reply Relationships within Email Conversations: A mixed-model visualization. Proceedings of SIGCHI'03, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA,361-368.
10. Jeong, A.C. (2003). The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in Online Threaded Discussion. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25-43.
11. Kanselaar, G., Erkens, G., Andriessen, J., Prangsma, M., Veerman, A., and Jaspers, J. (2003) Designing Argumentation Tools for Collaborative Learning. Book chapter of Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Kirschner, P.A., et al. eds, Springer.
12. Inokuchi, A., Washio, T. and Motodam H. (2000). An apriori-based algorithm for mining frequent substructures from graph data. Proceedings of PKDD 2000, Lyon, France, 13-23.
13. Kuramochi,M. and Karypis, G. (2001). Frequent subgraph discovery. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, San Jose, California, USA, 313-320.
14. Zaki, M.J. (2002). Efficiently mining frequent trees in a forest. Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, Edmonton, Canada, 71-80.