Evaluating the effect of feedback from a CSCL problem solving environment on learning, interaction, and perceived interdependence

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 1, 2007, Pages 231-240

  Gweon, Gahgene ^a   Rosé, Carolyn P ^a   Albright, Emil ^a   Cui, Yue ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAMMALS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; FEEDBACK CONFIGURATION; IMMEDIATE FEEDBACKS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING; INTERACTION PATTERN; PROBLEM SOLVING ENVIRONMENTS; SMALL SAMPLE SIZE; WORKED-OUT EXAMPLES;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 80052617233     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1599600.1599645     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Corbett, A., Lewis, M.W. (1990). Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 42, 7-49.
2. Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metameory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe and A. Shimamula (Eds). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1994, 185-205
3. Corbett, A. T., and Anderson, J. R. (2002). Locus of feedback control in computer-base tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In Proceedings of CHI 2002, ACM 2002, 245-252
4. Elbers, E., De Hann, M. Dialogic Learning in the Multi-Ethnic Classroom. Dialogic Learning: Shifting Perspectives to learning, instruction and teaching.
5. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gruesel, C & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232.
6. Koedinger, K. J., Anderson, R. J., Hadley, W.H., Mark, M.A. (1997). Intelligent Tutoring Goes to School in the Big City. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 8, 30-43
7. Lee, A. Y. (1992). Using tutoring systems to study learning: An application of HyperCard. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24 (2), 205-212
8. Nathan, M. J. (1998). Knowledge and situational feedback in a learning environment for algebra story problem solving. Interactive Learning Environments, 161-180
9. Palinscar, A.S., Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1 p.117-175.
10. Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibrium of cognitive structures: the central problem of intellectual development, Chicago University Press.
11. Rummel, N., Spada, H., Caspar, F., Ophoff, J. G., Schornstein, K. (2003). Instructional support for computermediated collaboration - results from process analyses. In Proc. CSCL 2003, 199-208.
12. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3 (4), 207-217
13. Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative Learning in Small Groups: Recent methods and Effects on Achievement, Attitudes, and Ethnic Relations. Review of Educational Research, Vol 50, No. 2, 241-271
14. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
15. Walker, E. (2005). Mutual Peer Tutoring: A Collaborative addition to the algebra-1 Cognitive Tutors. Young Researchers Track at AIED 2005
16. Webb, N., Nemer, K., Zuniga, S. (2002). Short Circuits or Superconductors? Effects of Group Composition on High-Achieving Students' Science Assessment Performance, American Educational Research Journal, 39, 4, 943-989.