Keynote address: The focus on competencies and individual learner assessment as emerging themes in medical education research

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1336-1343

  Hamstra, Stanley J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION SKILL; COMPETENCE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATIONAL THEORY; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEADERSHIP; LEARNING STYLE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL NETWORK; TEAMWORK;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; HUMANS; LEARNING;

EID: 84871744007     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: 15532712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/acem.12021     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Frohna AZ, Hamstra SJ, Mullan PB, Gruppen LD,. Teaching medical education principles and methods to faculty using an active learning approach: the University of Michigan Medical Education Scholars Program. Acad Med. 2006; 81: 975-8.
2. Chandran L, Gusic M, Baldwin C, et al. Evaluating the performance of medical educators: a novel analysis tool to demonstrate the quality and impact of educational activities. Acad Med. 2009; 84: 58-66.
3. Naik VN, Wong A, Hamstra SJ,. Review article: leading the future: guiding two predominant paradigm shifts in medical education through scholarship. Can J Anaesth. 2012; 59: 213-23.
4. Flexner A,. Medical Education in the United States and Canada. A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No. 4. Boston, MA: Updyke, 1910.
5. Ludmerer K,. Time To Heal: American Medical Education from the Turn of the Century to the Era of Managed Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.
6. Swing SR,. Assessing the ACGME general competencies: general considerations and assessment methods. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9: 1278-88.
7. Frank JR, Danoff D,. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 642-7.
8. Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010; 32: 638-45.
9. Taber S, Frank JR, Harris KA, Glasgow NJ, Iobst W, Talbot M,. Identifying the policy implications of competency-based education. Med Teach. 2010; 32: 687-91.
10. Reeves S, Fox A, Hodges BD,. The competency movement in the health professions: ensuring consistent standards or reproducing conventional domains of practice? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009; 14: 451-3.
11. Hodges B,. A tea-steeping or i-doc model for medical education? Acad Med. 2010; 85: s34-44.
12. Hodges B,. Medical education and the maintenance of incompetence. Med Teach. 2006; 28: 690-6.
13. Lingard L,. What we see and don't see when we look at "competence": notes on a god term. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009; 14: 625-8.
14. Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR,. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2010; 32: 676-82.
15. Antiel RM, Thompson SM, Reed DA, et al. ACGME duty-hour recommendations-a national survey of residency program directors. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: e12.
16. West CP, Tan AD, Habermann TM, Sloan JA, Shanafelt TD,. Association of resident fatigue and distress with perceived medical errors. JAMA. 2009; 302: 1294-300.
17. Albanese MA, Mejicano G, Mullan P, Kokotailo P, Gruppen L,. Defining characteristics of educational competencies. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 248-55.
18. Gruppen LD, Simpson D, Searle NS, Robins L, Irby DM, Mullan PB,. Educational fellowship programs: common themes and overarching issues. Acad Med. 2006; 81: 990-4.
19. van Zanten M, Boulet JR, McKinley D,. Using standardized patients to assess the interpersonal skills of physicians: six years' experience with a high-stakes certification examination. Health Commun. 2007; 22: 195-205.
20. Harden RM, Gleeson FA,. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979; 13: 41-54.
21. Reznick RK,. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg. 1993; 165: 358-61.
22. Martin J, Regehr G, Reznick RK, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997; 84: 273-8.
23. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, Martin J, McCulloch W,. Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. Am J Surg. 1997; 173: 226-30.
24. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS,. The mini-CEX: a method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: 476-81.
25. Boulet JR,. Summative assessment in medicine: the promise of simulation for high-stakes evaluation. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 1017-24.
26. Winckel CP, Reznick RK, Cohen R, Taylor B,. Reliability and construct-validity of a structured technical skills assessment form. Am J Surg. 1994; 167: 423-7.
27. Faulkner H, Regehr G, Martin J, Reznick RK,. Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents. Acad Med. 1996; 71: 1363-5.
28. Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Caminiti MF, Anastakis DJ, Grober ED, Reznick RK,. Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance. Surgery. 2003; 134: 750-7.
29. Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Anastakis DJ, Matsumoto ED, Cusimano MD,. Effect of visual-spatial ability on learning of spatially-complex surgical skills. Lancet. 2002; 359: 230-1.
30. Backstein D, Agnidis Z, Regehr G, Reznick RK,. The effectiveness of video feedback in the acquisition of orthopedic technical skills. Am J Surg. 2004; 187: 427-32.
31. Dath D, Regehr G, Birch D, et al. Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped assessment of laparoscopic technical skills. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 1800-4.
32. Datta V, Mackay S, Mandalia M, Darzi A,. The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. J Am Coll Surg. 2001; 193: 479-85.
33. Bann S, Davis IM, Moorthy K, et al. The reliability of multiple objective measures of surgery and the role of human performance. Am J Surg. 2005; 189: 747-52.
34. Dubrowski A, Sidhu RS, Park J, Brydges R, MacRae H,. Challenging the optimal challenge point model. J Sport Exercise Psych. 2004; 26: S65-6.
35. Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR, et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 374-81.
36. Darzi A, Smith S, Tafinder N,. Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective. Br Med J. 1999; 318: 887-8.
37. Van Sickle KR, McClusky DA 3rd, Gallagher AG, Smith CD,. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19: 1227-31.
38. Duffy AJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, et al. Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19: 401-5.
39. Rossi JV, Verma D, Fujii GY, et al. Virtual vitreoretinal surgical simulator as a training tool. Retina. 2004; 24: 231-6.
40. ®): evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 1440-4.
41. Rosenthal R, Gantert WA, Scheidegger D, Oertli D,. Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee's talent in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 1286-90.
42. Norman G,. Dual processing and diagnostic errors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009; 14 (Suppl 1): 37-49.
43. Moulton CA, Regehr G, Lingard L, Merritt C, MacRae H,. Slowing down to stay out of trouble in the operating room: remaining attentive in automaticity. Acad Med. 2010; 85: 1571-7.
44. Epstein RM,. Mindful practice. JAMA. 1999; 282: 833-9.
45. Boyer EL,. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
46. Fincher RM, Work JA,. Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching. Med Educ. 2006; 40: 293-5.
47. Glassick CE,. Boyer's expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Acad Med. 2000; 75: 877-80.
48. Fincher RM, Simpson DE, Mennin SP, et al. Scholarship in teaching: an imperative for the 21st century. Acad Med. 2000; 75: 887-94.
49. Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG,. Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 128-33.
50. Kirkpatrick DL,. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1998.
51. Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR,. BEME Guide No. 1: Best Evidence Medical Education. Med Teach. 1999; 21 (6): 553-562.
52. Yardley S, Dornan T,. Kirkpatrick's levels and education 'evidence'. Med Educ. 2012; 46: 97-106.
53. Searle NS, Thompson BM, Friedland JA, et al. The prevalence and practice of academies of medical educators: a survey of U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2010; 85: 48-56.
54. Goldszmidt MA, Zibrowski EM, Weston WW,. Education scholarship: it's not just a question of 'degree'. Med Teach. 2008; 30: 34-9.
55. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ,. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27: 10-28.
56. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011; 306: 978-88.
57. Kneebone R,. Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach. Acad Med. 2005; 80: 549-53.
58. Zendejas B, Wang AT, Brydges R, Hzamstra SJ, Cook DA,. Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review. Surgery. 2012 Aug 9 [Epub ahead of print].