Analysis of CPD Ultraviolet Lesion Bypass in Chicken DT40 Cells: Polymerase η and PCNA Ubiquitylation Play Identical Roles

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2012, Pages

  Varga, Ágnes ^a   Marcus, Adam P ^b   Himoto, Masayuki ^c   Iwai, Shigenori ^c   Szüts, Dávid ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLINE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ETA; DNA POLYMERASE REV1; POLYMERASE ZETA; PYRIMIDINE DIMER; THYMINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL STRAIN; CELL STRAIN DT40; GENE MUTATION; MUTAGENICITY; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SYNTHESIS; TRANSLESION SYNTHESIS; UBIQUITINATION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CELL LINE; CHICKENS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTAGENESIS; NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASES; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; PYRIMIDINE DIMERS; S PHASE; UBIQUITINATION; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 84871304145     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052472     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Waters LS, Minesinger BK, Wiltrout ME, D'Souza S, Woodruff RV, et al. (2009) Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73: 134-154.
2. Prakash S, Johnson RE, Prakash L, (2005) Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 74: 317-353.
3. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S, (2002) RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135-141.
4. Stelter P, Ulrich HD, (2003) Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425: 188-191.
5. Bienko M, Green CM, Crosetto N, Rudolf F, Zapart G, et al. (2005) Ubiquitin-binding domains in Y-family polymerases regulate translesion synthesis. Science 310: 1821-1824.
6. Nelson JR, Lawrence CW, Hinkle DC, (1996) Thymine-thymine dimer bypass by yeast DNA polymerase zeta. Science 272: 1646-1649.
7. Johnson RE, Prakash L, Prakash S (2012) Pol31 and Pol32 subunits of yeast DNA polymerase delta are also essential subunits of DNA polymerase zeta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
8. Chen CC, Motegi A, Hasegawa Y, Myung K, Kolodner R, et al. (2006) Genetic analysis of ionizing radiation-induced mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals TransLesion Synthesis (TLS) independent of PCNA K164 SUMOylation and ubiquitination. DNA Repair (Amst) 5: 1475-1488.
9. Szuts D, Marcus AP, Himoto M, Iwai S, Sale JE, (2008) REV1 restrains DNA polymerase zeta to ensure frame fidelity during translesion synthesis of UV photoproducts in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 6767-6780.
10. Hendel A, Krijger PH, Diamant N, Goren Z, Langerak P, et al. (2011) PCNA ubiquitination is important, but not essential for translesion DNA synthesis in mammalian cells. PLoS Genet 7: e1002262.
11. Ross AL, Simpson LJ, Sale JE, (2005) Vertebrate DNA damage tolerance requires the C-terminus but not BRCT or transferase domains of REV1. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 1280-1289.
12. Guo C, Sonoda E, Tang TS, Parker JL, Bielen AB, et al. (2006) REV1 protein interacts with PCNA: significance of the REV1 BRCT domain in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell 23: 265-271.
13. Guo C, Fischhaber PL, Luk-Paszyc MJ, Masuda Y, Zhou J, et al. (2003) Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis. EMBO J 22: 6621-6630.
14. Tissier A, Kannouche P, Reck MP, Lehmann AR, Fuchs RP, et al. (2004) Co-localization in replication foci and interaction of human Y-family members, DNA polymerase pol eta and REVl protein. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 1503-1514.
15. Ohashi E, Murakumo Y, Kanjo N, Akagi J, Masutani C, et al. (2004) Interaction of hREV1 with three human Y-family DNA polymerases. Genes Cells 9: 523-531.
16. Lehmann AR, Niimi A, Ogi T, Brown S, Sabbioneda S, et al. (2007) Translesion synthesis: Y-family polymerases and the polymerase switch. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 891-899.
17. Sale JE, Batters C, Edmunds CE, Phillips LG, Simpson LJ, et al. (2009) Timing matters: error-prone gap filling and translesion synthesis in immunoglobulin gene hypermutation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364: 595-603.
18. Ulrich HD, (2011) Timing and spacing of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass. FEBS Lett 585: 2861-2867.
19. Edmunds CE, Simpson LJ, Sale JE, (2008) PCNA ubiquitination and REV1 define temporally distinct mechanisms for controlling translesion synthesis in the avian cell line DT40. Mol Cell 30: 519-529.
20. Jansen JG, Tsaalbi-Shtylik A, Hendriks G, Gali H, Hendel A, et al. (2009) Separate domains of Rev1 mediate two modes of DNA damage bypass in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 29: 3113-3123.
21. Friedberg EC, Lehmann AR, Fuchs RP, (2005) Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? Mol Cell 18: 499-505.
22. Rupp WD, Howard-Flanders P, (1968) Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J Mol Biol 31: 291-304.
23. Elvers I, Johansson F, Groth P, Erixon K, Helleday T, (2011) UV stalled replication forks restart by re-priming in human fibroblasts. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 7049-7057.
24. Daigaku Y, Davies AA, Ulrich HD, (2010) Ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is separable from genome replication. Nature 465: 951-955.
25. Karras GI, Jentsch S, (2010) The RAD6 DNA damage tolerance pathway operates uncoupled from the replication fork and is functional beyond S phase. Cell 141: 255-267.
26. Lopes M, Foiani M, Sogo JM, (2006) Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol Cell 21: 15-27.
27. Narita T, Tsurimoto T, Yamamoto J, Nishihara K, Ogawa K, et al. (2010) Human replicative DNA polymerase delta can bypass T-T (6-4) ultraviolet photoproducts on template strands. Genes Cells 15: 1228-1239.
28. Ravanat JL, Douki T, Cadet J, (2001) Direct and indirect effects of UV radiation on DNA and its components. J Photochem Photobiol B 63: 88-102.
29. You YH, Lee DH, Yoon JH, Nakajima S, Yasui A, et al. (2001) Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are responsible for the vast majority of mutations induced by UVB irradiation in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 276: 44688-44694.
30. Jans J, Schul W, Sert YG, Rijksen Y, Rebel H, et al. (2005) Powerful skin cancer protection by a CPD-photolyase transgene. Curr Biol 15: 105-115.
31. Ikehata H, Ono T, (2011) The mechanisms of UV mutagenesis. J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 52: 115-125.
32. Thomas NE, Berwick M, Cordeiro-Stone M, (2006) Could BRAF mutations in melanocytic lesions arise from DNA damage induced by ultraviolet radiation? J Invest Dermatol 126: 1693-1696.
33. Yoon JH, Prakash L, Prakash S, (2009) Highly error-free role of DNA polymerase eta in the replicative bypass of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in mouse and human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 18219-18224.
34. Murata T, Iwai S, Ohtsuka E, (1990) Synthesis and Characterization of a Substrate for T4 Endonuclease-V Containing a Phosphorodithioate Linkage at the Thymine Dimer Site. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 7279-7286.
35. Zhang H, Lawrence CW, (2005) The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 15954-15959.
36. Baba TW, Giroir BP, Humphries EH, (1985) Cell lines derived from avian lymphomas exhibit two distinct phenotypes. Virology 144: 139-151.
37. Arakawa H, Moldovan GL, Saribasak H, Saribasak NN, Jentsch S, et al. (2006) A role for PCNA ubiquitination in immunoglobulin hypermutation. PLoS Biol 4: e366.
38. Hirota K, Sonoda E, Kawamoto T, Motegi A, Masutani C, et al. (2010) Simultaneous disruption of two DNA polymerases, Poleta and Polzeta, in Avian DT40 cells unmasks the role of Poleta in cellular response to various DNA lesions. PLoS Genet 6.
39. Takeda DY, Shibata Y, Parvin JD, Dutta A, (2005) Recruitment of ORC or CDC6 to DNA is sufficient to create an artificial origin of replication in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 19: 2827-2836.
40. Rao BS, Martin RG, (1988) DpnI assay for DNA replication in animal cells: enzyme-resistant material can result from factors not related to replication. Nucleic Acids Res 16: 4171.
41. Ozgenc AI, Szekeres ES, Lawrence CW, (2005) In vivo evidence for a recA-independent recombination process in Escherichia coli that permits completion of replication of DNA containing UV damage in both strands. J Bacteriol 187: 1974-1984.
42. Crevel G, Cotterill S, (2012) Forced binding of the origin of replication complex to chromosomal sites in Drosophila S2 cells creates an origin of replication. J Cell Sci 125: 965-972.
43. Lehmann AR, (1972) Postreplication repair of DNA in ultraviolet-irradiated mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 66: 319-337.
44. Lehmann AR, Kirk-Bell S, Arlett CF, Paterson MC, Lohman PH, et al. (1975) Xeroderma pigmentosum cells with normal levels of excision repair have a defect in DNA synthesis after UV-irradiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72: 219-223.
45. Ulrich HD, Jentsch S, (2000) Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J 19: 3388-3397.
46. Unk I, Hajdu I, Fatyol K, Szakal B, Blastyak A, et al. (2006) Human SHPRH is a ubiquitin ligase for Mms2-Ubc13-dependent polyubiquitylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 18107-18112.
47. Unk I, Hajdu I, Blastyak A, Haracska L (2010) Role of yeast Rad5 and its human orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH in DNA damage tolerance. DNA Repair (Amst).
48. McIlwraith MJ, Vaisman A, Liu Y, Fanning E, Woodgate R, et al. (2005) Human DNA polymerase eta promotes DNA synthesis from strand invasion intermediates of homologous recombination. Mol Cell 20: 783-792.
49. Kawamoto T, Araki K, Sonoda E, Yamashita YM, Harada K, et al. (2005) Dual roles for DNA polymerase eta in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol Cell 20: 793-799.
50. Banerjee SK, Christensen RB, Lawrence CW, LeClerc JE, (1988) Frequency and spectrum of mutations produced by a single cis-syn thymine-thymine cyclobutane dimer in a single-stranded vector. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 8141-8145.
51. Gibbs PE, McDonald J, Woodgate R, Lawrence CW, (2005) The relative roles in vivo of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol eta, Pol zeta, Rev1 protein and Pol32 in the bypass and mutation induction of an abasic site, T-T (6-4) photoadduct and T-T cis-syn cyclobutane dimer. Genetics 169: 575-582.
52. Shachar S, Ziv O, Avkin S, Adar S, Wittschieben J, et al. (2009) Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and error-prone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals. EMBO J 28: 383-393.
53. Ziv O, Geacintov N, Nakajima S, Yasui A, Livneh Z, (2009) DNA polymerase zeta cooperates with polymerases kappa and iota in translesion DNA synthesis across pyrimidine photodimers in cells from XPV patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 11552-11557.
54. Ikehata H, Kawai K, Komura J, Sakatsume K, Wang L, et al. (2008) UVA1 genotoxicity is mediated not by oxidative damage but by cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in normal mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol 128: 2289-2296.
55. Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L, (1999) Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Poleta. Science 283: 1001-1004.
56. Guo D, Wu X, Rajpal DK, Taylor JS, Wang Z, (2001) Translesion synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase zeta from templates containing lesions of ultraviolet radiation and acetylaminofluorene. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 2875-2883.
57. Stone JE, Kumar D, Binz SK, Inase A, Iwai S, et al. (2011) Lesion bypass by S. cerevisiae Pol zeta alone. DNA Repair (Amst) 10: 826-834.
58. Livneh Z, Ziv O, Shachar S, (2010) Multiple two-polymerase mechanisms in mammalian translesion DNA synthesis. Cell Cycle 9: 729-735.
59. Zhang Y, Wu X, Guo D, Rechkoblit O, Taylor JS, et al. (2002) Lesion bypass activities of human DNA polymerase mu. J Biol Chem 277: 44582-44587.
60. Servant L, Cazaux C, Bieth A, Iwai S, Hanaoka F, et al. (2002) A role for DNA polymerase beta in mutagenic UV lesion bypass. J Biol Chem 277: 50046-50053.
61. Kannouche PL, Wing J, Lehmann AR, (2004) Interaction of Human DNA Polymerase eta with Monoubiquitinated PCNA; A Possible Mechanism for the Polymerase Switch in Response to DNA Damage. Mol Cell 14: 491-500.
62. Parker JL, Bielen AB, Dikic I, Ulrich HD, (2007) Contributions of ubiquitin- and PCNA-binding domains to the activity of Polymerase eta in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 881-889.
63. Murakumo Y, Ogura Y, Ishii H, Numata S, Ichihara M, et al. (2001) Interactions in the error-prone postreplication repair proteins hREV1, hREV3, and hREV7. J Biol Chem 276: 35644-35651.
64. Acharya N, Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L, (2006) Complex formation with Rev1 enhances the proficiency of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase zeta for mismatch extension and for extension opposite from DNA lesions. Mol Cell Biol 26: 9555-9563.
65. Lemontt JF, (1971) Mutants of yeast defective in mutation induced by ultraviolet light. Genetics 68: 21-33.
66. Jansen JG, Tsaalbi-Shtylik A, Hendriks G, Verspuy J, Gali H, et al. (2009) Mammalian polymerase zeta is essential for post-replication repair of UV-induced DNA lesions. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 1444-1451.
67. Diamant N, Hendel A, Vered I, Carell T, Reissner T, et al. (2012) DNA damage bypass operates in the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle and exhibits differential mutagenicity. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 170-180.
68. Temviriyanukul P, van Hees-Stuivenberg S, Delbos F, Jacobs H, de Wind N, et al. (2012) Temporally distinct translesion synthesis pathways for ultraviolet light-induced photoproducts in the mammalian genome. DNA Repair (Amst) 11: 550-558.