Gender differences in student motivation and self-regulation in science learning: A multi-group structural equation modeling analysis

International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1347-1368

  Velayutham, Sunitadevi ^a   Aldridge, Jill M ^a   Fraser, Barry ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

gender differences; motivation; science learning; self regulation; structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871051887     PISSN: 15710068     EISSN: 15731774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-012-9339-y     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ames, C. A. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
2. Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J. & Fraser, B. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students' motivation and self-regulation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 2159-2179. doi: 10. 1080/09500693. 2010541529.
3. Baker, D. (2002). Editorial: Where is gender and equity in science education? Journal of Research in Science Education, 39, 659-664.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C. & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and uses as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285-309.
6. Boekaerts, M. & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199-210.
7. Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 955-970.
8. Britner, S. L. & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485-499.
9. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
10. Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii-xvi.
11. Chin, W. W. (2004). Multi-group analysis with PLS. Retrieved 1 April 2010 from http://discnt. cba. uh. edu/chin-/plsfaq/-multigroup. htm.
12. Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influences, and practices. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 229-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Debacker, T. K. & Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 245-254.
14. DeCoster, J. (1998). Overview of factor analysis. Retrieved 23 January 2010 from http://www. stat-help. com/factor. pdf.
15. Dignath, C., Buettner, G. & Langfeldt, H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 101-129.
16. Dunning, D., Health, C. & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69-106.
17. Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task values and the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105-121). New York: Guilford.
18. Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
19. Falk, R. F. & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
20. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.
21. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
22. Fryer, J. W. & Elliot, A. J. (2008). Self regulation of achievement goal pursuit. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 53-76). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Gefen, D., Straub, D. & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling techniques and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 7, 1-78.
24. Guthrie, J., McRae, A. & Klauda, S. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42, 237-250.
25. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19, 139-151.
26. Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Press.
27. Haworth, C. M. A., Dale, P. S. & Plomin, R. (2010). Sex differences in school science performance from middle childhood to early adolescence. International Journal of Educational Research, 49, 92-101.
28. Hensler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least square path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319.
29. Ivie, R., Czujko, R. & Stowe, K. (2002). Women physicists speak: The 2001 International Study of Women in Physics. In B. K. Artline & D. Li (Eds.), Women in physics: The IUPAP International Conference on Women in Physics. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics.
30. Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contribution and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141-187.
31. Lee, M., Johanson, R. E. & Tsai, C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students' conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92, 191-220.
32. Martin, A. J. (2004). School motivation of boys and girls: Differences of degree, differences of kind, or both? Journal of Psychology, 56, 133-146.
33. Meece, J. L. & Eccles, J. (1993). Introduction: Recent trends in research on gender and education. Educational Psychologist, 28, 313-319.
34. Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B. & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351-373.
35. Midgley, C. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Morris, T. L., Lee, S. & Barnes, L. L. B. (2008). The development and use of an instrument to measure willingness to seek help from peers and teachers when studying college mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 11, 227-243.
37. Newman, R. S. (1998). Students' help seeking during problem solving: Influences of personal and contextual achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 644-658.
38. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Osborne, J. & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
40. Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41, 116-125.
41. Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111-139). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Pajares, F. & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students' writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 353-360.
43. Pajares, F. & Valiante, G. (2001). Gender differences in writing motivation and achievement of middle school students: A function of gender orientation? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 366-381.
44. Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 147-165.
45. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic.
46. Pintrich, P. R. & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In R. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 731-810). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
47. Programme for International Student Assessment (2009). Equally prepared for life? How 15 year-old boys and girls perform in school. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
48. Santosa, P. I., Wei, K. K. & Chan, H. C. (2005). User involvement and user satisfaction with information-seeking activity. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 361-370.
49. Schunk, D. H. & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence beliefs in academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85-104). New York: Guilford.
50. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R. & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
51. Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1-30). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E. & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70-83.
53. Sungur, S. (2007). Modeling the relationships among students' motivational beliefs, metacognitive strategy use, and effort regulation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 315-326.
54. Tuan, H., Chin, C. & Shieh, S. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 639-654.
55. Urdan, T. C. & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 524-551.
56. Urdan, T., Midgley, C. & Anderman, E. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students' use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101-122.
57. Urdan, T. & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331-349.
58. Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to math. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 305-322.
59. Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Gender and occupational choice. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 379-400). New York: Springer.
60. Wigfield, A. & Cambria, J. (2010). Students' achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, 1-35.
61. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S. & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). Development between the ages of 11 and 25. In R. C. Calfee & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 148-185). New York: Prentice Hall International.
62. Wolter, C. A. (2010). Self-regulated learning and the 21st century competencies. Retrieved 1 February 2011 from http://www7. nationalacademies. org/DBASSE/Wolters_Self_Regulated_Learning-_Paper.
63. Wolters, C. A. & Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students' motivational beliefs and their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Education Research, 33, 801-820.
64. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
65. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64-70.