Differential regulation of DNA damage response activation between somatic and germline cells in Caenorhabditis elegans

Cell Death and Differentiation

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1847-1855

  Vermezovic, J ^a   Stergiou, L ^b   Hengartner, M O ^b   D'Adda Di Fagagna, F ^a,c  

^a FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

ATM; C. elegans; DNA damage response (DDR) signaling; DNA repair; germline; soma

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; DNA;

ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL DEATH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REPRESSION; GERM LINE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; SOMATIC CELL;

ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GERM CELLS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RADIATION, IONIZING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS;

ANIMALIA; CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS;

EID: 84870993730     PISSN: 13509047     EISSN: 14765403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2012.69     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, McDonald ER 3rd, Hurov KE, Luo J, et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007; 316:1160-1166.
2. Branzei D, Foiani M. Regulation of DNA repair through out the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9: 297-308.
3. Gartner A, Milstein S, Ahmed S, Hodgkin J, Hengartner MO. A conserved checkpoint pathway mediates DNA damage-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in C. elegans. Mol Cell 2000; 5: 435-443.
4. Kim ST, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB. Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:37538-37543.
5. Carballo JA, Johnson AL, Sedgwick SG, Cha RS. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 byMec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 2008; 132: 758-770.
6. Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Sun Z, Morrow JS, Pradhan D, Stern DF. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell 2002; 9: 1055-1065.
7. DiTullio Jr RA, Mochan TA, Venere M, Bartkova J, Sehested M, Bartek J, et al. 53BP1 functions in an ATM-dependent checkpoint pathway that is constitutively activated in human cancer. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4: 998-1002.
8. Dar I, Biton S, Shiloh Y, Barzilai A. Analysis of the ataxia telangiectasia mutated-mediated DNA damage response in murine cerebellar neurons. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 7767-7774.
9. Garcia-Muse T, Boulton SJ. Distinct modes of ATR activation after replication stress and DNA double-strand breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO J 2005; 24: 4345-4355.
10. Stergiou L, Doukoumetzidis K, Sendoel A, Hengartner MO. The nucleotide excision repair pathway is required for UV-C-induced apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death Differ 2007; 14: 1129-1138.
11. Chin GM, Villeneuve AM. C. elegans mre-11 is required for meiotic recombination and DNA repair but is dispensable for the meiotic G(2) DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev 2001; 15: 522-534.
12. Ahmed S, Hodgkin J. MRT-2 checkpoint protein is required for germline immortality and telomere replication in C. elegans. Nature 2000; 403:159-164.
13. Hofmann ER, Milstein S, Boulton SJ, Ye M, Hofmann JJ, Stergiou L, et al. Caenorhabditis elegans HUS-1 is a DNA damage checkpoint protein required for genome stability and EGL-1-mediated apoptosis. Curr Biol 2002; 12:1908-1918.
14. Ahmed S, Alpi A, Hengartner MO, Gartner A. C. elegans RAD-5/CLK-2 defines a new DNA damage checkpoint protein. Curr Biol 2001; 11:1934-1944.
15. Kodoyianni V, Maine EM, Kimble J. Molecular basis of loss-of-function mutations in the glp-1 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell 1992; 3:1199-1213.
16. Harper JW, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol Cell 2007; 28: 739-745.
17. Boyd WA, Crocker TL, Rodriguez AM, Leung MC, Lehmann DW, Freedman JH, et al. Nucleotide excision repair genes are expressed at low levels and are not detectably inducible in Caenorhabditis elegans somatic tissues, but their function is required for normal adult life after UVC exposure. Mutat Res 683: 57-67.
18. Derry WB, Putzke AP, Rothman JH. Caenorhabditis elegans p53: role in apoptosis, meiosis, and stress resistance. Science 2001; 294: 591-595.
19. Riballo E, Kuhne M, Rief N, Doherty A, Smith GC, Recio MJ, et al. A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci. Mol Cell 2004; 16: 715-724.
20. Ziv Y, Bielopolski D, Galanty Y, Lukas C, Taya Y, Schultz DC et al. Chromatinrelaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM-and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8: 870-876.
21. Tanaka H, Arakawa H, Yamaguchi T, Shiraishi K, Fukuda S, Matsui K, et al. A ribonucleotide reductase gene involved in a p53-dependent cell-cycle checkpoint for DNA damage. Nature 2000; 404: 42-49.
22. Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J 1998; 17: 1819-1828.
23. Wang D, Kennedy S, Conte D Jr., Kim JK, Gabel HW, Kamath RS, et al. Somatic misexpression of germline P granules and enhanced RNA interference in retinoblastoma pathway mutants. Nature 2005; 436: 593-597.
24. Curran SP, Wu X, Riedel CG, Ruvkun G. A soma-to-germline transformation in long-lived Caenorhabditis elegans mutants. Nature 2009; 459:1079-1084.
25. Ciosk R, DePalma M, Priess Jr. Translational regulators maintain totipotency in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Science 2006; 311: 851-853.
26. Schneider L, Fumagalli M, d'Adda di Fagagna F. Terminally differentiated astrocytes lack DNA damage response signaling and are radioresistant but retain DNA repair proficiency. Cell Death Differ 2012; 19: 582-591.
27. Stergiou L, Eberhard R, Doukoumetzidis K, Hengartner MO. NER and HR pathways act sequentially to promote UV-C-induced germ cell apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell Death Differ 2011; 18: 897-906.
28. Schumacher B, Hanazawa M, Lee MH, Nayak S, Volkmann K, Hofmann ER, et al. Translational repression of C. elegans p53 by GLD-1 regulates DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Cell 2005; 120: 357-368.
29. Finney M, Ruvkun G. The unc-86 gene product couples cell lineage and cell identity in C. elegans. Cell 1990; 63: 895-905.
30. Kamath RS, Ahringer J. Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods 2003; 30: 313-321.
31. Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, Gotta M, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 2003; 421: 231-237.