Teaching in 'blended' learning environments: How are conceptions of teaching and eteaching associated?

ASCILITE 2009 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 346-353

  González, Carlos ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS; E-TEACHING; FACE TO FACE; FACE-TO-FACE LEARNING; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; QUALITY LEARNING; TEACHING EXPERIENCE; TECHNICAL SKILLS;

STUDENTS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 84870920036     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Åkerlind, G. S. (2004). A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 363-375.
2. Ashwin, P. (2006). Variation in academics' accounts of tutorials. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 651-665.
3. Bowden, J. (2000b). The nature of phenomenographic research. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 1-18). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
4. Carnell, E. (2007). Conceptions of effective teaching in higher education: extending the boundaries. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 25-40.
5. Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Calvo, R. A., & Prosser, M. (2008). Engineering students' conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 267-282.
6. Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., O'Hara, A., & Prosser, M. (2007). The university student experience of face-to-face and online discussions: coherence, reflection and meaning. ALT-J, 15(1), 83-97.
7. Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O'Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn through online and face-to-face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 244-256.
8. Ellis, R. A., Marcus, G., & Taylor, R. (2005). Learning through inquiry: Student difficulties with online course-based Material. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 239-252.
9. Ellis, R. A., Steed, A. F., & Applebee, A. C. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 312-335. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet22/ellis.html
10. Ginns, P., Kitay, J., & Prosser, M. (2008). Developing conceptions of teaching and the scholarship of teaching through a Graduate Certificate in Higher Education. The International Journal for Academic Development, 13, 175-185.
11. González, C. (2009). Conceptions of, and approaches to, teaching online: a study of lecturers teaching postgraduate distance courses. Higher Education, 57(3), 299-314.
12. González, C. (in press-a). Extending research on 'conceptions of teaching': Commonalities and differences in recent investigations.
13. González, C. (in press-b). What do university teachers think eLearning is good for in their teaching? Studies in Higher Education.
14. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. Definition, current trends and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning. Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
15. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255-275.
16. Kember, D., & Kwan, K. P. (2000). Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28(5-6), 469-490.
17. th International Conference on Networked Learning, Halkidiki, Greece.
18. Law, E. H. F., Joughin, G., Kennedy, K. J., Tse, H., & Yu, W. M. (2007). Teacher educators' pedagogical principles and practices: Hong Kong perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(2), 247-261.
19. Lofstrom, E., & Nevgi, A. (2008). University teaching staffs' pedagogical awareness displayed through ICT-facilitated teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 101-116.
20. McConnell, D., & Zhao, J. (2006). Chinese higher education teachers' conceptions of eLearning: preliminary outcomes. In Who's learning? Whose technology? Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2006. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p224.pdf
21. Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2007). University teachers' conceptions of good teaching in the units of high-quality education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(3-4), 355-370.
22. Postareff, L., Katajavuori, N., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Trigwell, K. (2008). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 49-61.
23. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4(3), 217-231.
24. Roberts, G. (2003). Teaching using the web: Conceptions and approaches from a phenomenographic perspective. Instructional Science, 31(1-2), 127-150.
25. Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83-94.
26. Trigwell, K. (2000). A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 63-82). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
27. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275-284.
28. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (2005). University teachers' experiences of change in their understanding of the subject matter they have taught. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 251-264.
29. Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (in press). University students' and teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional Science.