Variation in academics' accounts of tutorials

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 651-665

  Ashwin, Paul ^a,b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750521572     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075070601004234     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Åkerlind, G. S. (2003) Growing and developing as a university teacher-variation in meaning, Studies in Higher Education, 28, 375-390.
2. Åkerlind, G. S. (2005) Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods, Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 321-334.
3. Ashwin, P. (2005) Variation in students' experiences of the Oxford tutorial, Higher Education, 50, 631-644.
4. Coffey, M. & Gibbs, G. (2002) Measuring teachers' repertoire of teaching methods, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 383-390.
5. Commission of Inquiry (1997) Commission of inquiry report (Oxford, University of Oxford).
6. Gibbs, G. & Coffey, M. (2000) Training to teach in higher education: a research agenda, Teacher Development, 4, 31-44.
7. Gow, L. & Kember, D. (1993) Conceptions of teaching and their relation to student learning, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 93-97.
8. Martin, E. & Balla, M. (1991) Conceptions of teaching and implications for learning, Research and Development in Higher Education, 13, 298-304.
9. Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997) Learning and awareness (Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
10. McCune, V. (2004) Development of first-year students' conceptions of essay writing, Higher Education, 47, 257-282.
11. Moore, W. G. (1968) The tutorial system and its future (Oxford, Pergamon).
12. Palfreyman, D. (Ed.) (2001) The Oxford tutorial: 'thanks, you taught me how to think' (Oxford, Oxford Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies).
13. Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1997) Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 25-35.
14. Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999) Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education (Buckingham, Open University Press).
15. Richardson, J. (1997) The concepts and methods of phenomenographic research, Review of Educational Research, 69, 53-82.
16. Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K. & Martin, E. (2003) Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning, Studies in Higher Education, 28, 37-48.
17. Säljö, R. (1997) Talk as data and practice-a critical look at phenomenographic inquiry and the appeal to experience, Higher Education Research & Development, 16, 173-190.
18. Samuelowicz, K. & Bain, J. (1992) Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers, Higher Education, 24, 93-112.
19. Shale, S. (2001) The Oxford tutorial in the context of theory on student learning, in: D. Palfreyman (Ed.) The Oxford tutorial: 'thanks, you taught me how to think' (Oxford, Oxford Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies).
20. Tapper, E. & Palfreyman, D. (2000) Oxford and the decline of the collegiate tradition (London, Woburn Press).
21. Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1996) Changing approaches to teaching: a relational perspective, Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275-284.
22. Trowler, P. & Turner, G. (2002) Exploring the hermeneutic foundations of university life: deaf academics in a hybrid 'community of practice', Higher Education, 43, 227-256.
23. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. & Waterhouse, F. (1999) Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning, Higher Education, 37, 55-70.
24. University Grants Committee (UGC) (1964) Report of the committee on University teaching methods (The Hale Report) (London, HMSO).
25. Webb, G. (1997) Deconstructing deep and surface: towards a critique of phenomenography, Higher Education, 33, 195-212.