UNIVERSITY TEACHERS' CONCEPTIONS OF GOOD TEACHING IN THE UNITS OF HIGH-QUALITY EDUCATION

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 33, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 355-370

  Parpala, Anna ^a   Lindblom Ylänne, Sari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548029371     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Biggs J. Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education 8 (1979) 381-394
2. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). The Society for Research into Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3. Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pedlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
4. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
5. Entwistle N., Skinner D., Entwistle D., and Orr S. Conceptions and beliefs about "good teaching": An integration of contrasting research areas. Higher Education Research & Development 19 (2000) 5-26
6. Entwistle, N., & Walker, P. (2002). Strategic alertness and expanded awareness within sophisticated conceptions of teaching. In N. Hativa & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education (pp. 15-39). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
7. Hämäläinen K., and Moitus S. High-quality education as the criterion for university funding in Finland. Quality in Higher Education 5 1 (1999) 51-59
8. Hölttä S. The funding of universities in Finland: Towards goal-oriented government steering. European Journal of Education 33 (1998) 55-63
9. Kember D. A reconceptualisation of the research into academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction 7 (1997) 255-275
10. Kember D., and Gow L. Orientations to teaching and their effect on the quality of student learning. Journal of Higher Education 65 (1994) 58-73
11. Kember, D., & Kwan K-P. (2002). Lecturers' approaches to teaching and their relationship to conception of good teaching. In N. Hativa & P. Goodyear (Eds.), Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education (pp. 219-240). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
12. Knubb-Manninen G., & Nuutinen, A. (2001). Laatuyksikköjärjestelmä oppimisen ja opetuksen kehittämisen välineenä [Quality unit evaluation as a tool for developing teaching and learning]. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.kka.fi/pdf/muut/muut_julkaisut/ktlmuistio.doc.
13. Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1999). Studying in a traditional medical curriculum - study success, orientations to studying and problem that arise. The University of Helsinki. Faculty of Medicine.
14. Lindblom-Ylänne S., Trigwell K., Nevgi A., and Ashwin P. How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education 31 3 (2006) 285-298
15. Lueddeke G. Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and "teaching-scholarship". Studies in Higher Education 28 (2003) 213-228
16. Management and Steering of Higher Education in Finland. (2004). Publications of the Ministry of Education, Finland.
17. Marton F., and Säljö R. On qualitative differences in learning I - Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1976) 4-11
18. Parpala, A., & Seppälä, H. (Eds.) (2003). Yliopistokoulutuksen laatuyksiköt 2004-2006 [The units of high quality education 2004-2006]. Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvoston julkaisuja 5:2003.
19. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education. Buckingham: The Society for research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
20. Valtakunnalliset koulutuksen laatuyksiköt Helsingin yliopistossa [Quality units in the University of Helsinki] (2006). Retrieved September 29, 2006, from http://www.helsinki.fi/arviointi/koulutuksen_laadunvarmistus/valtakunnalliset_laatuyksikot.htm
21. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
22. Trigwell K. Approaches to teaching design subjects: A quantitative analysis. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education 1 (2002) 69-80
23. Trigwell K., and Prosser M. Relating approaches to studying and quality of student learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology 61 (1991) 265-275
24. Trigwell K., and Prosser M. Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review 16 (2004) 409-424
25. Trigwell K., Prosser M., and Waterhouse F. Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education 37 (1999) 57-70