Phylogenetic and mixed Yule-coalescent analyses reveal cryptic lineages within two South American marine snails of the genus Crepipatella (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae)

Invertebrate Biology

Volumn 131, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 301-311

  Nuñez, José J ^a   Vejar Pardo, Andrés ^b,e   Guzmán, Benjamín E ^c   Barriga, Elías H ^d   Gallardo, Carlos S ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE ATACAMA   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

^d UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES   (Chile)

^e DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGÍA   (Chile)

Author keywords

Cryptic species; Dilatata; Fecunda; Species limits

Indexed keywords

CALYPTRAEIDAE; CREPIPATELLA; CREPIPATELLA DILATATA; CREPIPATELLA FECUNDA; GASTROPODA;

EID: 84870520588     PISSN: 10778306     EISSN: 17447410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ivb.12003     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aguilera-Munoz F, Lafarga-Cruz F, & Gallardo-Escarate C 2009. Molecular analysis in Chilean commercial gastropods based on 16S rRNA, COI and ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 sequences. Gayana 73: 17-27.
2. Anisimova M & Gascuel O 2006. Approximate likelihood ratio test for branches: a fast, accurate and powerful alternative. Syst. Biol. 55: 539-552.
3. Anisimova M, Gil M, Dufayard JF, Dessimoz C, & Gascuel O 2011. Survey of branch support methods demonstrates accuracy, power and robustness of fast-likelihood-based approximation schemes. Syst. Biol. 60: 685-699.
4. Carstens BC & Dewey TA 2010. Species delimitation using a combined coalescent and information theoretic approach: an example from North American Myotis bats. Syst. Biol. 59: 400-414.
5. Chaparro OR & Paschke KA 1990. Nurse egg feeding and energy balance in embryos of Crepidula dilatata Lamarck during intracapsular development. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 65: 183-191.
6. Chaparro OR, Charpentier JL, & Collin R 2002. Embryonic velar structure and function of two sibling species of Crepidula with different modes of development. Biol. Bull. 203: 80-86.
7. Chaparro OR, Saldivia CL, Pereda SV, Segura CJ, Montiel YA, & Collin R 2005. The reproductive cycle and development of Crepipatella fecunda (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) from southern Chile. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 85: 157-161.
8. Collin R 2002. Another last word on Crepidula convexa and a description of C. ustulatulina sp. nov. (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) from the Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70: 177-184.
9. Collin R 2003a. Worldwide patterns in mode of development in calyptraeid gastropods. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 247: 103-122.
10. Collin R 2003b. Phylogenetic relationships among calyptraeid gastropods and their implications for the biogeography of marine speciation. Syst. Biol. 52: 618-640.
11. Collin R 2005. Development, phylogeny, and taxonomy of Bostrycapulus (Caenogastropoda: Calyptraeidae), an ancient cryptic radiation. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 144: 75-101.
12. Collin R, Chaparro O, Winkler F, & Véliz D 2007. Molecular phylogenetic and embryological evidence that feeding larvae have been reacquired in a marine gastropod. Biol. Bull. 212: 83-92.
13. Crandall ED, Frey MA, Grosberg RK, & Barber PH 2008. Contrasting demographic history and phylogeographical patterns in two Indo-Pacific gastropods. Mol. Ecol. 17: 611-626.
14. Drummond AJ & Rambaut A 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 214.
15. Ellingson RA & Krug PJ 2006. Evolution of poecilogony from planktotrophy: Cryptic speciation, phylogeography and larval development in the gastropod genus Alderia. Evolution 60: 2293-2310.
16. Fang H & Kubatko LS 2011. Estimating species trees using approximate Bayesian computation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 59: 354-363.
17. Felsenstein J 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791. http://www.dnabarcoding.ca/pa/ge/news/scientific-publications-_473.
18. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, & Vrijemhoek R 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3: 294-299.
19. Fujita MK & Leaché AD 2011. A coalescent perspective on delimiting and naming species: a reply to Bauer AM, Parham JF, Brown RM, Stuart BL, Grismer L, Papenfuss TJ, Bohme W, Savage JM, Carranza S, Grismer JL, Wagner P, Schmitz A, Ananjeva NB, & Inger RF. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 278: 493-495.
20. Gallardo CS 1977. Two modes of development in the morphospecies Crepidula dilatata (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) from Southern Chile. Mar. Biol. 39: 241-251.
21. Gallardo CS 1979. Especies gemelas del género Crepidula (Gastropoda, Calyptraeidae) en la costa de Chile: una redescripción de C. dilatata Lamarck y descripción de C. fecunda n. sp. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Envir. 14: 215-226.
22. Guindon S & Gascuel O 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52: 696-704.
23. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, & Gascuel O 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59: 307-321.
24. Guzmán BE, Nuñez JJ, Gallardo CS, Vejar A, & Barriga EH 2011. Genetic diversity and population structure of two South American marine gastropods, Crepipatella dilatata and C. fecunda (Calyptraeidae): distinct patterns based on developmental mode. Ital. J. Zool. 78: 444-454.
25. Harrington RC & Near TJ 2012. Phylogenetic and coalescent strategies of species delimitation in snubnose darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Syst. Biol. 61: 63-69.
26. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, & Dewaard JR 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270: 313-321.
27. Hillis DM & Bull JJ 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 182-192.
28. Hoagland KE & Robertson R 1988. An assessment of poecilogony in marine invertebrates: phenomenon or fantasy? Biol. Bull. 174: 95-108.
29. Huelsenbeck JP & Rannala P 2004. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Syst. Biol. 53: 904-913.
30. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, & Miyata T 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 511-518.
31. Knowles LL & Carstens BC 2007. Delimiting species without monophyletic gene trees. Syst. Biol. 56: 887-895.
32. Knowles LL & Chan YH 2008. Resolving species phylogenies of recent evolutionary radiations. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 95: 224-231.
33. Li WLS & Drummond AJ 2012. Model averaging and Bayes factor calculation of relaxed molecular clocks in Bayesian phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29: 751-761.
34. Lim GS, Balke M, & Meier R 2012. Determining species boundaries in a world full of rarity: singletons, species delimitation methods. Syst. Biol. 61: 165-169.
35. Mermod G 1950. Les Types de la Collection Lamarck au Muséum de Geneve. Mollusques Vivants, I. Rev. Suizze Zool. 57: 687-756.
36. Meyer CP, Geller JB, & Paulay G 2005. Fine scale endemism on coral reefs: archipelagic differentiation in turbinid gastropods. Evolution 59: 13-125.
37. Monaghan MT, Wild R, Elliot M, Fujisawa T, Balke M, Inward DJG, Lees DC, Ranaivosolo R, Eggleton P, Barraclough TG, & Vogler AP 2009. Accelerated species inventory on Madagascar using coalescent-based models of species delineation. Syst. Biol. 58: 298-311.
38. Moore WS 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: Mitochondrial gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 49: 718-726.
39. Neigel JE & Avise JC 1986. Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. In: Evolutionary Processes and Theory. Nevo E & Karlin S, eds., pp. 515-534. Academic Press, New York.
40. Nekola JC, Coles BF, & Bergthorsson U 2009. Evolutionary pattern and process in the Vertigo gouldii (Mollusca: Pulmonata: Pupillidae) group of minute North American land snails. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 53: 1010-1024.
41. Nylander JA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, & Nieves-Aldrey JL 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53: 47-67.
42. Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, Kamoun S, Sumlin WD, & Vogler AP 2006. Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst. Biol. 55: 595-609.
43. Posada D 2006. Collapse: Describing Haplotypes From Sequence Alignments. Available at: http://darwin.uvigo.es/software/collapse.html.
44. Posada D 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253-1256.
45. Posada D & Buckley TR 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53: 793-808.
46. Powell JR, Monaghan MT, Opik M, & Rillig MC 2011. Evolutionary criteria outperform operational approaches in producing ecologically relevant fungal species inventories. Mol. Ecol. 20: 655-666.
47. Puillandre N, Strong EE, Bouchet P, Boisselier MC, Couloux A, & Samadi S 2009. Identifying gastropod spawn from DNA barcodes: possible but not yet practicable. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9: 1311-1321.
48. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres D, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, & Huelsenbeck JP 2011. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61: 539-542.
49. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, & Maniatis T 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd Edition. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, NY. 1659 pp.
50. Schluter D 2009. Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternatives. Science 323: 737-741.
51. Schluter D & Conte GL 2009. Genetics and ecological speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.) 106: 9955-9962.
52. Schmidt HA & Von Haeseler A 2007. Maximum-Likelihood analysis using TREE-PUZZLE. Curr. Protocols Bioinformatics 17: 6.6.1-6.6.23.
53. Schmidt HA, Strimmer K, Vingron M, & Von Haeseler A 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18: 502-504.
54. Shimodaira H & Hasegawa M 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 1114-1116.
55. Strimmer K & von Haeseler A 1996. Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 964-969.
56. Strimmer K & von Haeseler A 1997. Likelihood-mapping: a simple method to visualize phylogenetic content of a sequence alignment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94: 6815-6819.
57. Swofford DL 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
58. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, & Kumar S 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 2731-2739.
59. Tautz D, Arctander P, Minelli A, Thomas RH, & Vogler AP 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003: 70-74.
60. Teske PR, Papadopoulos I, McQuaid CD, Newman BK, & Barker NP 2007. Climate change, genetics or human choice: why were the shells of mankind's earliest ornament larger in the Pleistocene than in the Holocene? PLoS ONE 7: e614.
61. Thaler AD, Zelnio K, Saleu W, Schultz TF, Carlsson J, Cunningham C, Vrijenhoek RC, & Van Dover CL 2011. The spatial scale of genetic subdivision in populations of Ifremeria nautilei, a hydrothermal-vent gastropod from the southwest Pacific. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 372. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-372.
62. Thorpe RS, Surget-Groba Y, & Johansson H 2010. Genetic tests for ecological and allopatric speciation in Anoles on an island archipelago. PLoS Genet. 6: e1000929. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000929.
63. Véliz D, Winkler F, & Guisado C 2003. Developmental and genetic evidence for the existence of three morphologically cryptic species of Crepidula in northern Chile. Mar. Biol. 143: 131-142.
64. Zhang C, Zhang D-X, & Yang Z 2011. Evaluation of a Bayesian coalescent method of species delimitation. Syst. Biol. 60: 747-776.
65. Zhu T & Yang Z 2012. Maximum likelihood implementation of an isolation-with-migration model with three species for testing speciation with gene flow. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29: 3131-3142. doi:10.1093/molbev/mss118.