Phylogenetic Relationships Among Calyptraeid Gastropods and Their Implications for the Biogeography of Marine Speciation

Systematic Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 618-640

  Collin, Rachel ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^c APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

16S; Biogeographic barriers; Calyptraea; Crepidula; Crucibulum; Cytochrome oxidase I; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEA; SNAIL; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; GEOGRAPHY; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MOVEMENT; OCEANS AND SEAS; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SNAILS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; CALYPTRAEA; CALYPTRAEIDAE; CREPIDULA; GASTROPODA; INVERTEBRATA; LIPARIS (SCORPAENIFORM);

EID: 0242487511     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150390235430     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. ADAMS, C. B. 1852. Catalogue of shells collected at Panama. Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. New York. 5:5-334.
2. ANGAS, G. F. 1847. South Australia Illustrated. London.
3. AVISE, J. C. 1992. Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna: A case history with lessons for conservation biology. Oikos 63:62-76.
4. BANDEL, K., AND F. RIEDEL. 1994. Classification of fossil and recent Calyptraeoidea (Caenogastropoda) with a discussion of neomesogastropod phylogeny. Berl. Geowiss. Abh. E 13:329-367.
5. BARKER, F. K., AND F. M. LUTZONI. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51:625-637.
6. BERMINGHAM, E., AND H. A. LESSIOS. 1993. Rate variation of proteins and mitochondrial DNA evolution as revealed by sea urchins separated by the Isthmus of Panama. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:2734-2738.
7. BERT, T. M. 1986. Speciation in western Atlantic stone crabs (genus Menippe): The role of geological patterns and climatic events in the formation and distribution of species. Mar. Biol. 93:157-170.
8. BORN, I. 1778. Index Rerum Naturalium Musei Caesarei Vindobonensis. Pars I. Testacea. [xlii] + 458 + [82] pp., 1 pl. Officina Krausiana: Wien.
9. BOWEN, B. W., A. L. BASS, L. A. ROCHA, W. S. GRANT, AND D. R. ROBERTSON. 2001. Phylogeography of the trumpetfishes (Aulostomus): Ring species complex on a global scale. Evolution 55:1029-1039.
10. BRIGGS, J. C. 1961. Marine zoogeography. McGraw-Hill, New York.
11. BRODERIP, W. J. 1834. Characters of new genera and species of Mollusca and Conchifera, collected by Mr. Cuming. Descriptions of new species of Calyptraeidae. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 2:35-40.
12. BRODERIP, W. J. 1835. Descriptions of some new species of Calyptraeidae. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1:195-206.
13. BROWN, D. I., AND C. A. OLIVARES. 1996. A new species of Crepidula (Mollusca: Mesogastropoda: Calyptraeidae) from Chile: Additional characters for the identification of the eastern Pacific planar Crepidula group. J. Nat. Hist. 30:1443-1458.
14. CARLTON, J. T. 1979. History, biogeography, and ecology of the introduced marine and estuarine invertebrates of the Pacific coast of North America. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. California, Davis.
15. COE, W. R. 1942a. The reproductive organs of the prosobranch mollusk Crepidula onyx and their transformation during the change from male to female phase. J. Morphol. 70:501-512.
16. COE, W. R. 1942b. Influence of natural and experimental conditions in determining shape of shell and rate of growth in gastropods of the genus Crepidula. J. Morphol. 71:35-47.
17. COE, W. R. 1947. Biology of Crepidula williamsi, a new species of proso-branch gastropod from the Pacific coast. J. Morph. 81:241-248.
18. COLBORN, J., R. E. CRABTREE, J. B. SHAKLEE, E. PFEILER, AND B. W. BOWEN. 2001. The evolutionary enigma of bonefishes (Albula spp.): Cryptic species and ancient separation in a globally distributed shorefish. Evolution 55:807-820.
19. COLLIN, R. 1995. Sex, size, and position: A test of models predicting the size at sex change in the protandrous gastropod Crepidula fornicata. Am. Nat. 146:815-831.
20. COLLIN, R. 2000. Phylogeny of the Crepidula plana (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) cryptic species complex in North America. Can. J. Zool. 78:1500-1514.
21. COLLIN, R. 2001. Mode of development, phylogeography, and population structure of North Atlantic Crepidula (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) species. Mol. Ecol. 10:2249-2262.
22. COLLIN, R. 2002a. Another last word on C. convexa and a description of C. ustulatulina n. sp. from the Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70:177-184.
23. COLLIN, R. 2002b. Evolution of mode of development in Crepidula (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae): Causes and consequences. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. Chicago, Chicago.
24. COLLIN, R. 2003a. World-wide patterns of development in calyptraeid gastropods. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 247:103-122.
25. COLLIN, R. 2003b. The utility of morphological characters in gastropod phylogenetics: An example from the Calyptraeidae. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 78:541-593.
26. CONRAD, T. A. 1846. Description of new species of fossil and recent shells and corals. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 3:19-27.
27. COOK, J. M., A. ROKAS, M. PAGEL, AND G. N. STONE. 2002. Evolutionary shifts between host oak sections and host-plant organs in Andricus gallwasps. Evolution 56(9):1821-1830.
28. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997a. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:733-740.
29. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1997b. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylognetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46:464-478.
30. CUNNINGHAM, C. W. 1999. Some limitations of ancestral characterstate reconstruction when testing evolutionary hypotheses. Syst. Biol. 48(3):665-674.
31. DARLU, P., AND G. LECONTRE. 2002. When does the incongruence length difference test fail? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:432-437.
32. DEFRANCE, M. J. L. 1818. Crepidula fossil species. Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, 11:397.
33. DESLOUS-PAOLI, J. M. 1985. Crepidula fornicata L. (gastéropode) dans le bassin de Marennes-Oléron: Structure, dynamique et production d'une population. Oceanol. Acta 8: 453-460.
34. D'ORBIGNY, A. D. 1841. Mollusques. Voyage dans l'Amérique Méridionale, 1826-1833. Ministre de l'Instruction Publique, Paris, Vol. 5. 758 pp.
35. DOWTON, M., AND A. D. AUSTIN. 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy - The behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 51:19-31.
36. DUDA, T. A., AND S. R. PALUMBI. 1999. Developmental shifts and species selection in gastropods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10272-10277.
37. DUFFY, J. E. 1996. Resource-associated population subdivision in a symbiotic coral-reef shrimp. Evolution 50:360-373.
38. EKMAN, S. 1953. Zoogeography of the sea. Sidgwick and Jackson, London.
39. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
40. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 16:183-196.
41. FlNLAY, H. J. 1926. A further commentary on New Zealand molluscan systematics. Trans. N.Z. Inst. 57:320-485.
42. FOLMER, O., M. BLACK, W. HOEH, R. LUTZ, AND R. VRIJENHOEK. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3:294-299.
43. GALLARDO, C. S. 1977. Crepidula philippiana n. sp. nuevo gastropodo Calyptraeidae de Chile con especial referenda al patron de desarrollo. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 12:177-185.
44. GALLARDO, C. S. 1979. Especies gemelas del género Crepidula (Gastropoda, Calyptraeidae) en la costa de Chile: Una redescripción de C. dilatata Lamarck y description de C. fecunda n. sp. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 14:215-226.
45. GMELIN, J. F. 1791. Systema naturae, 13th edition, Volume 1, part 6:3021-4120. G. E. Beer, Lipsiae.
46. GOULD, A. A. 1846. Descriptions of shells of the exploring expedition. Proc. Boston. Soc. Nat. Hist. 2:159-162.
47. GRAY, J. E. 1867. Notes on the specimens of Calyptraeidae in Mr. Cuming's collection. Proc. Zool. Soc. London. 1867:726-748.
48. GRIGG, R. W., AND R. HEY. 1992. Paleoceanography of the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean. Science 255:172-178.
49. HELLBERG, M. E. 1998. Sympatric sea shells along the sea's shore: The geography of speciation in the marine gastropod Tegula. Evolution 52:1311-1324.
50. HINDS, R. B. 1843. On new species of shells collected by Sir Edward Belcher. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 11:17-19.
51. HOAGLAND, K. E. 1977. Systematic review of fossil and recent Crepidula. Malacologia 16:363-420.
52. HOAGLAND, K. E. 1978. Protandry and the evolution of environmentally- mediated sex change: A study of the mollusca. Malacologia 17:365-391.
53. HOAGLAND, K. E. 1984. Use of molecular genetics to distinguish species of the gastropod genus Crepidula (Prosobranchia: Calyptraeidae). Malacologia 25:607-628.
54. HOAGLAND, K. E. 1986. Patterns of encapsulation and brooding in the Calyptraeidae (Prosobranchia: Mesogastropoda). Am. Malacol. Bull. 4:173-183.
55. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 2000. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Distributed by the author, Department of Biology, Univ. Rochester, Rochester, New York.
56. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUEST. 2001. MrBayes 2.0: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Distributed by the authors, Department of Biology, Univ. Rochester, Rochester, New York, and Department of Biology, Univ. Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
57. KESSING, B. D. 1991. Strongylocentrotid sea urchin mitochondrial DNA: Phylogenetic relationships and patterns of molecular evolution. M.Ec. Thesis, Univ. Hawaii, Honolulu.
58. KNOWLTON, N., AND L. A. WEIGT. 1998. New dates and new rates for divergence across the Isthmus of Panama. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:2257-2263.
59. KOOL, S. P. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of the Rapaninae (Neogastropoda: Muricidae). Malacologia 35:155-259.
60. KRAUSS, F. 1848. Südafrikanischen Mollusken. Verlag von Ebner & Seubert. Stuttgart, p. 140.
61. KURODA, T., AND T. HABE. 1950. Nomenclatural notes. Illustrated Catalogue of Japanese Shells. (4):30. Kyoto, Japan.
62. LAMARCK, J. B. 1799. D'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Mémoires de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. 1:63-91.
63. LAMARCK, J. B. 1822. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertébres, 1st edition, Volume 6, part 2. Author, Paris.
64. LEE, Y.-H., AND V. D. VACQUIER. 1995. Evolution and systematics in Haliotidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda): Inferences from DNA sequences of sperm lysin. Mar. Biol. 124:267-278.
65. LESSIOS, H. A., B. D. KESSING, AND J. S. PEARSE. 2001. Population structure and speciation in tropical seas: Global phylogeny of the sea urchin Diadema. Evolution 55:955-975.
66. LESSIOS, H. A., B. D. KESSING, AND D. R. ROBERTSON. 1998. Massive gene flow across the world's most potent marine biogeographic barrier. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:583-588.
67. LESSIOS, H. A., B. D. KESSING, D. R. ROBERTSON, AND G. PAULAY. 1999. Phylogeography of the pantropical sea urchin Eucidaris in relation to land barriers and ocean currents. Evolution 53:806-817.
68. LESSON, R. P. 1830. Mollusques, annelids et vers. Chapter 11, pp. 239-488 in L. J. Duperry, Voyage autour du monde execute par ordre du Roi, sur la corvette de S. M. La Coquille pendant les années 1822,1823, 1824 et 1825, sous le ministrére et conformément aux instructions de S. E. M. Le Marquis de Clarmont-Tonnerre, Ministre de la Marine. Zoologie 2(1). Bertrand, Paris.
69. LEVITON, A. E., R. H. GIBBS, E. HEAL, AND C. E. DAWSON. 1985. Standards in herpetology and ichthyology: Part I. Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology. Copeia 1985:802-832.
70. LINNAEUS, C. 1758. Systema Naturae. Ed. 10. Vol. 1. Laurentii Salvii: Holmiae. Stockholm, Sweden. 823 pp.
71. LOOMIS, S. H., AND W. VANNIEUWENHUYZE. 1985. Sediment correlates to density of Crepidula fornicata Linnaeus in the Pataguanset River, Connecticut. Veliger 27:266-272.
72. LUTZONI, F., P. WAGNER, V. REEB, AND S. ZOLLER. 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Syst. Biol. 49:628-651.
73. MAYR, E. 1954. Geographic speciation in tropical echinoids. Evolution 8:1-18.
74. MARKO, P. B. 1998. Historical allopatry and the biogeography of speciation in the prosobranch snail genus Nucella. Evolution 52:757-774.
75. MARKO, P. B. 2002. Fossil calibration of molecular clocks and the divergence times of geminate species pairs separated by the Isthmus of Panama. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2005-2021.
76. MARKO, P., AND G. J. VERMEIJ. 1999. Molecular phylogenetics and the evolution of labral spines among eastern Pacific ocenebrine gastropods. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13:275-288.
77. MATUSIAK, J. P., AND P. E. FELL. 1982. Reproductive cycle of Crepidula convexa (Say) within a New England eelgrass community. Int. J. Invertebr. Reprod. 5:253-260.
78. MCGEE, B. L., AND N. M. TARGETT. 1989. Larval and habitat selection in Crepidula (L.) and its effect on adult distribution patterns. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 131:195-214.
79. MCLEAN, J. H. 1995. Three additional new genera and two replacement names for northeastern Pacific prosobranch gastropods. Nautilus 108:80-82.
80. MELVILL, J. C. 1888. A survey of the genus Cypraea (Linn.), its nomenclature, geographical distribution, and distinctive affinities. Mem. Proc. Manch. Lit. Philos. Soc. 4(1):184-252.
81. MENKE, K. T. 1851. Conchylien von Mazatlan, mit kritischen Anmerkungen. Seitschrift für Malakozoologie 8:33-38.
82. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30:351-370.
83. MØLLER, H. P. C. 1842. Index Molluscorum Groenlandiae. 25 pp. C. A. Reitzelii, Hafniae.
84. MONTFORT, D. 1810. Conchyliologie systématique, et classification méthodique de coquilles. Conchyliologie Systématique 2 [iii] + 676 pp. F. Schoell, Paris.
85. MÖRCH, O. A. L. 1852. Catalogus Conchyliorum. 1:107. Hafniaeæ, typis Trieri.
86. MÖRCH, O. A. L. 1877. Synopsis molluscorum marinorum Indiarum occidentalium imprimis insularum danicarum. Malakozool. Blätter 24:93-123.
87. OLSSON, A. A., AND A. HARBISON. 1953. Pliocene Mollusca of southern Florida. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia Monogr. 8:1-457.
88. PAGEL, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 255:37-45.
89. PAGEL, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48:612-622.
90. PALUMBI, S. R. 1996a. Nucleid acids II: The polymerase chain reaction. Pages 205-248 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
91. PALUMBI, S. R. 1996b. What can molecular genetics contribute to marine biogeography? An urchin's tale. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 203:75-92.
92. PARK, J.-K., AND D. O'FOIGHIL. 2000. Sphaeriid and corbiculid clams represent separate heterodont bivalve radiation into freshwater environments. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14:75-88.
93. PEILE, A. J. 1924. A new species of Sigapatella (S. terraenovae). Proc. Malacol. Soc. London 16:21-23.
94. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. ModelTest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
95. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 2001. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Syst. Biol. 50:580-601.
96. QUOY, J. R. C., AND J. P. GAIMARD. 1832-1833. Voyage de l' Astrolabe. Volume 3. Zoologie, mollusques. J. Tastu, Paris.
97. REEVE, L. 1842. Conchologia systematica, or Complete System of Conchology: In Which Lepades and Conchiferous Mollusca Are Described and Classified According to Their Natural Organization and Habits. Vol. 2. Longman, Brown, Green and Longman. London pp. 337.
98. REEVE, L. A. 1859. Conchologia Iconica: Or illustrations of the shells of moluscous animals, Volume 11. Reeve Brothers, London.
99. REID, D. G. 1989. The comparative morphology, phylogeny and evolution of the gastropod family Littorinidae. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 324:1-110.
100. RÖDING, P. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum: Pars secunda continens Conchylia. J. C. Trappii, Hamburg, pp. 109.
101. SAURIAU, P-G., C. PICHOCKI-SEYFRIED, P. WALKER, X. DE MONTAUDOUIN, C. PALUD, AND M. HÉRAL. 1998. Crepidula fornicata L. (mollusque, gastéropode) en baie de Marennes-Oléron: Cartographie des fonds par sonar àbalayage latéral et estimation du stock. Oceanol. Acta 21:1-10.
102. SAY, T. 1822. An account of the marine shells of the United States. J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 2:221-227.
103. SCHELTEMA, R. S. 1986. On dispersal and planktonic larvae of benthic invertebrates: An eclectic overview and summary of problems. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39:290-322.
104. SCHUMACHER, H. C. F. 1817. Essai d'une nouveau systeme des habitations des vers testaces. Schultz, Copenhagen.
105. SHENK, M. A., AND R. H. KARLSON. 1986. Colonization of a shell resource by calyptraeid gastropods: Tests of habitat selection and preemption models. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 99:79-89.
106. SIMONE, L. R. L. 2002. Comparative morphological study and phylogeny of representatives of the superfamilies Calyptraeoidea (including Hipponicoidea) (Mollusca, Caenogastropoda). Bioto Neotrop. 2(2). [Online journal at http://www.biotaneotropica. org.br.].
107. SIMONE, L. R. L., G. PASTORINO, AND P. E. PENCHASZADEH. 2000. Crepidula argentina (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae), a new species from the littoral of Argentina. Nautilus 114:127-141.
108. SOLANDER, D. 1786. In. A catalog of the Portland Museum, lately the property of the Duchess Dowager of Portland, deceased: Which will be sold by auction, etc. London.
109. SOWERBY, G. B. 1825. Catalogue of the shells of Tankerville. Stirling, London, p. 92.
110. SUTER, H. 1907. Results of dredging in Hauraki Gulf: With descriptions of seven new species. Trans. N. Z. Inst. 39:252-265.
111. SWAINSON, W. 1840. A Treatise on Malacology: Or, Shells and Shell Fish. Longman, Orne, Brown, Green, and Longmans. London, 419 pp.
112. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
113. TROSCHEL, F. H. 1861. Das Gebib der Schnecken zur Begründung einer natürlichen Classification. Nicolaische Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin.
114. VALENCIENNES, A. 1846. Voyage autour du monde sur la Venus. 1836-1839. Atlas, Mollusques.
115. VÉLIZ, D., C. GUISADO, AND F. M. WINKLER. 2001. Morphological, reproductive, and genetic variability among three populations of Crucibulum quiriquinae (Gastropoda: Calyptraeidae) in northern Chile. Mar. Biol. 139:527-534.
116. VERMEIJ, G. J., AND S. J. CARLSON. 2000. The muricid gastropod sub-family Rapaninae: Phylogeny and ecological history. Paleobiology 26:19-46.
117. VERMEIJ, G. J., R. B. LOWELL, L. J. WALTERS, AND J. A. MARKS. 1987. Good hosts and their guests: Relations between trochid gastropods and the epizoic limpet Crepidula adunca. Nautilus 101:69-74.
118. VERMEIJ, G. J., AND E. J. PETUCH. 1986. Differential extinction in tropical American molluscs: Endemism, architecture, and the Panama land bridge. Malacologia 27:29-41.
119. VON MIDDENDORFF, A. T. 1849. Beiträge zu einer Malacozoologia Rossica. II. Aufzählung und Beschreibung der zur Meeresfauna Russlands gehörigen einschaler. Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg, Sciences Naturelles (6)6:329-516, pls. 1-11.
120. VON SALIS, C. U. 1793. Reisen in Verschiedne Provinzen des Königreichs Neapel 1. 442 [+2], 10 pls. Ziegler und Söhne, Zürich and Leipzig.
121. WHEELER, W. C. 1990. Combinatorial weights in phylogenetic analysis: A statistical parsimony procedure. Cladistics 6:269-275.
122. WILLIAMSON, M. B. 1905. New varieties of Crepidula rugosa Nutt. Found on Natica and on Norrisia. Nautilus 19:50-51.
123. WOOD, W. 1828. Supplement to the Index Testaceologicus. W. Wood, London.
124. WOODRUFF, D. S., L. L. MCMEEKIN, M. MULVEY, AND M. P. CARPENTER. 1986. Population genetics of Crepidula onyx: Variation in a Californian slipper snail recently established in China. Veliger 29:53-63.