Estimating species trees using approximate Bayesian computation

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 354-363

  Fan, Helen Hang ^a   Kubatko, Laura S ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Approximate Bayesian computation; Coalescent theory; Gene tree; Species tree

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PRIMATE; YEAST;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PRIMATES; YEASTS;

PRIMATES;

EID: 79955092139     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.02.019     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Allman, E.S., Degnan, J.H., Rhodes, J.A., in press. Identifying the rooted species tree from the distribution of unrooted gene trees under the coalescent. J. Math. Biol. doi: 10.1007/s00285-010-0355-7.
2. Beaumont M.A., Zhang W., Balding D.F. Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics 2002, 162:2025-2035.
3. Degnan J., Salter L. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process. Evolution 2005, 59(1):24-37.
4. Ebersberger I., Galgoczy P., Taudien S., Taenzer S., Platzer M., Von Haeseler A. Mapping human genetic ancestry. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 2007, 24(10):2266-2276.
5. Edwards S.V., Liu L., Pearl D.K. High resolution species trees without concatenation. PNAS 2007, 104:5936-5941.
6. Heled J., Drummond A.J. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 2010, 27(3):570-580.
7. Hird S.L.S.Kubatko, Carstens B.C. Rapid and accurate species tree estimation for phylogeographic investigations using replicated subsampling. Mol. Phylogenet. Evolut. 2010, 57(2):888-898.
8. Huang H., He Q., Kubatko L.S., Knowles L.L. Sources of error for species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59(5):573-583.
9. Hudson R.R. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:337-338.
10. Ihaka R., Gentleman R. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1996, 5:299-314.
11. Kubatko L., Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(7):971-973.
12. Liu L., Pearl D.K. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:504-514.
13. Liu L., Yu L., Pearl D.K., Edwards S.V. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58(5):468-477.
14. Maddison W. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 1997, 46:523-536.
15. Moore G.W., Goodman M., Barnabas J. An iterative approach from the standpoint of the additive hypothesis to the dendrogram problem posed by molecular data sets. J. Theor. Biol. 1973, 38:423-457.
16. Pamilo P., Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 1988, 5:568-583.
17. Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K. APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:289-290.
18. Rannala B., Yang Z. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 2003, 164:1645-1656.
19. Robinson D.F. Comparison of labeled treeswith valency three. J. Combinator. Theory Ser. B 1971, 11:105-119.
20. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 2003, 425(6960):798-804.
21. Rosenberg N.A. The probability of topological concordance of gene trees and species trees. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2002, 61:225-247.
22. Shoemaker J.S., Painter I.S., Weir B.S. Bayesian statistics in genetics. Trends Genet. 1999, 15:354-358.
23. Swofford, D.L., 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
24. Than C., Ruths D., Nakhleh L. PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9:322.