Evidence for a limited-cascading account of written word naming

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1741-1758

  Bonin, Patrick ^a   Roux, Sébastien ^a   Barry, Christopher ^b   Canell, Laura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cascaded processing; Frequency trajectory; Word frequency; Written naming

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; WRITING;

ADOLESCENT; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHONETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY; WRITING;

EID: 84870350975     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0028471     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Alario, F.- X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 531-552. doi:10.3758/BF03200732
2. Barry, C. (1994). Spelling routes (or roots or rutes). In G. D. A. Brown & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 27-49). Chichester, England: Wiley.
3. Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50, 560-585. doi:10.1080/027249897392026
4. Beattie, G. W., & Butterworth, B. L. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses and errors in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22, 201-211.
5. Belke, E., Brysbaert, M., Meyer, A. S., & Ghyselinck, M. (2005). Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: Evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition, 96, B45-B54. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.006
6. Blazely, A. M., Coltheart, M., & Casey, B. J. (2005). Semantic impairment with and without surface dyslexia: Implications for models of reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 695-717. doi:10.1080/02643290442000257
7. Bloem, I., & LaHeij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 307-323. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.001
8. Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945-984). New York, NY: Academic Press.
9. Bonin, P., Barry, C., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2004). The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 456-476. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.001
10. Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Barry, M. (2006). Are age-ofacquisition effects in object naming simply due to differences in object recognition? Comments on Levelt (2002). Memory & Cognition, 34, 1172-1182. doi:10.3758/BF03193263
11. Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 89-114. doi:10.1348/000712602162463
12. Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2000). Writing words from pictures: What representations are activated and when? Memory & Cognition, 28, 677-689. doi:10.3758/BF03201257
13. Bonin, P., Fayol, M., & Chalard, M. (2001). Age of acquisition and word frequency in written picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 54, 469-489. doi:10.1080/02724980042000219
14. Bonin, P., Méot, A., Mermillod, M., Ferrand, L., & Barry, C. (2009). The effects of age of acquisition and frequency trajectory on object naming: Comments on Pérez (2007). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1132-1140. doi:10.1080/17470210802618850
15. Bonin, P., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2001). Do phonological codes constrain the selection of orthographic codes in written picture naming? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 688-720. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2786
16. Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 158-167. doi:10.3758/BF03195507
17. Bramão, I., Inácio, F., Faísca, L., Reis, A., & Petersson, K. M. (2011). The influence of color information on the recognition of color diagnostic and noncolor diagnostic objects. Journal of General Psychology, 138, 49-68.
18. Brennen, T., David, D., Fluchaire, I., & Pellat, J. (1996). Naming faces and objects without comprehension: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 93-110. doi:10.1080/026432996382079
19. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208. doi:10.1080/026432997381664
20. Caramazza, A., Bi, Y., Costa, A., & Miozzo, M. (2004). What determines the speed of lexical access: Homophone or specific-word frequency? A Reply to Jescheniak et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 278-282. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.278
21. Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1430-1450. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1430
22. Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243-297. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90047-N
23. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1997). The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access: Evidence from the 'tip-ofthe-tongue' phenomenon. Cognition, 64, 309-343. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00031-0
24. Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1998). More is not always better: A response to Roelofs, Meyer and Levelt. Cognition, 69, 231-241.
25. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 25, 257-271. doi:10.3758/BF03204507
26. Colomé, A., & Miozzo, M. (2010). Which words are activated during bilingual word production? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 96-109. doi:10.1037/a0017677
27. Coltheart, M. (2004). Are there lexicons? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57, 1153-1171.
28. Cubelli, R. (1991). A selective deficit for writing vowels in acquired dysgraphia. Nature, 353, 258-260. doi:10.1038/353258a0
29. Cuetos, F., Bonin, P., Alameda, J. R., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The specific-word frequency effect in speech production: Evidence from Spanish and French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 750-771. doi:10.1080/17470210903121663
30. Delattre, M., Bonin, P., & Barry, C. (2006). Written spelling to dictation: Sound-to-spelling regularity affects both writing latencies and durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1330-1340. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1330
31. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
32. Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313-349. doi:10.1080/01690969008407066
33. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and non-aphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
34. Dent, K., Catling, J. C., & Johnston, R. A. (2007). Age of acquisition affects object recognition: Evidence from visual duration thresholds. Acta Psychologica, 125, 301-318. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.08.004
35. Ellis, A. W. (1982). Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp.113-146). London, England: Academic Press.
36. Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1103-1123. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1103
37. Fery, P., & Morais, J. (2003). A case study of visual agnosia without perceptual processing or structural descriptions impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 595-618. doi:10.1080/02643290242000880
38. Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102, 219-260. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
39. Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (1998). Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between lexical processing levels in spoken word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 313-338. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2547
40. Hand, C. J., Miellet, S., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2010). The frequency-predictability interaction in reading: It depends where you're coming from. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1294-1313.
41. Hodges, J. R., & Greene, J. D. W. (1998). Knowing about people and naming them: Can Alzhieimer's disease patients do one without the other? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 51, 121-134.
42. Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 115-162. doi:10.1080/02643290242000871
43. Hovius, M., Kellenbach, M. L., Graham, K. S., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2003). What does the object decision task measure? Reflections on the basis of evidence from semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 17, 100-107. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.17.1.100
44. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-104. doi:10.1080/02643298808252927
45. Jescheniak, J. D., Hahne, A., & Schriefers, H. (2003). Information flow in the mental lexicon during speech planning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 261-276. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00198-2
46. Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824
47. Jescheniak, J. D., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Specific word frequency is not all that counts in speech production. Reply to Caramazza et al. and new experimental data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 432-438. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.432
48. Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Wagner, V., Mädebach, A., & Schriefers, H. (2009). Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code? Experimental Psychology, 56, 56-65. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.56
49. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1997). Lexical access in speech production: Serial or cascaded processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 847-852. doi:10.1080/016909697386727
50. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (1998). Discrete serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in speech production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1256-1274. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1256
51. Johnston, R. A., & Barry, C. (2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing. Visual Cognition, 13, 789-845. doi:10.1080/13506280544000066
52. Kandel, S., & Spinelli, E. (2010). Processing complex graphemes in handwriting production. Memory & Cognition, 38, 762-770. doi:10.3758/MC.38.6.762
53. Keefe, D. E., & Neely, J. H. (1990). Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: The role of prospective prime-generated expectancies. Memory & Cognition, 18, 289-298. doi:10.3758/BF03213882
54. Knobel, M., Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2008). The many places of frequency: Evidence for a novel locus of the lexical frequency effect in word production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 256-286. doi:10.1080/02643290701502425
55. Kremin, H. (1986). Spared naming without comprehension. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2, 131-150. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(86)80008-2
56. Kuipers, J. R., & La Heij, W. (2009). The limitations of cascading in the speech production system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 120-135. doi:10.1080/01690960802234177
57. Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 156-166. doi:10.3758/BF03195560
58. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
60. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.122
61. Lupker, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Making things difficult in lexical decision: The impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1267-1289. doi:10.1037/a0020125
62. Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110816297
63. Mädebach, A., Jescheniak, J. D., Oppermann, F., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Ease of processing constrains the activation flow in the conceptuallexical system during speech planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 649-660. doi:10.1037/a0022330
64. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
65. Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2007). Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 494-503. doi:10.3758/BF03193289
66. Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00009-2
67. Miceli, G., & Capasso, R. (1997). Semantic errors as neuropsychological evidence for the independence and the interaction of orthographic and phonological word forms. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 733-764. doi:10.1080/016909697386673
68. Miceli, G., Capasso, R., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Sublexical conversion procedures and the interaction of phonological and orthographic forms. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 557-572. doi:10.1080/026432999380726
69. Morsella, E., & Miozzo, M. (2002). Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 555-563. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.555
70. Morton, J. (1980). The logogen model and orthographic structure. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 117-135). London, England: Academic Press.
71. Morton, J. (1985). Naming. In S. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 217-230). Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone.
72. Navarrete, E., Basagni, B., Alario, F.-X., & Costa, A. (2006). Does word frequency affect lexical selection in speech production? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1681-1690. doi:10.1080/17470210600750558
73. Navarrete, E., & Costa, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 359-377. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.001
74. Neely, J. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226
75. New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 516-524. doi:10.3758/BF03195598
76. Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273-281. doi:10.1080/17470216508416445
77. Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., & Görges, F. (2010). Semantic relatedness among objects promotes the activation of multiple phonological codes during object naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 356-370. doi:10.1080/17470210902952480
78. Pérez, M. (2007). Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 32-42. doi:10.1080/17470210600577423
79. Perret, C., & Laganaro, M. (2012). Comparison of electrophysiological correlates of writing and speaking: A topographic ERP analysis. Brain Topography, 25, 64-72.
80. Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539-557. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.539
81. Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633-651. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2592
82. Rapp, B., Benzing, L., & Caramazza, A. (1997). The autonomy of lexical orthography. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 71-104. doi:10.1080/026432997381628
83. Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1997). From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: Levels of representation in written spelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1130-1152. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1130
84. Rapp, B., Epstein, C., & Tainturier, M.-J. (2002). The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 1-29. doi:10.1080/0264329014300060
85. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Object recognition. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 45-74). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
86. Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
87. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
88. Roelofs, A. (2008). Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 353-368. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.353
89. Roeltgen, D. P., Gonzalez-Rothi, L., & Heilman, K. M. (1986). Linguistic semantic agraphia: A dissociation of the lexical spelling system from semantics. Brain and Language, 27, 257-280. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(86)90020-9
90. Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217-236. doi:10.1068/p5117
91. Roux, S., & Bonin, P. (2012). Cascaded processing in written naming: Evidence from the picture-picture interference paradigm. Language and Cognitive Processes. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.580162
92. Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). Fractionating the reading process in dementia: Evidence for word-specific print-tosound associations. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (pp. 259-269). London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
93. Sheridan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). A verbal-semantic categoryspecific recognition impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 143-184. doi:10.1080/02643299308253459
94. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for names agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
95. Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 28, 516-536. doi:10.3758/BF03200540
96. Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Damian, M. F., Pérez, M. A., Bowers, J. S., & Marín, J. (2009). Name-picture verification as a control measure for object naming: A task analysis and norms for a large set of pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1581-1597. doi:10.1080/17470210802511139
97. Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. C. (1992). Resolving empirical inconsistencies concerning priming, frequency and nonword foils in lexical decision. Language and Speech, 35, 295-324.
98. text it. (2012). UK sends 11 million text messages an hour. Retrieved April 19, 2012, from http://www.text.it/
99. Weekes, B. S., Shu, H., Hao, M., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2007). Predictors of timed picture naming in Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 335-342. doi:10.3758/BF03193165
100. Yap, M. J., Tse, C.-S., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency revealed by RT distributional analyses: The role of lexical integrity. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 303-325. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.001
101. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1-29. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2834
102. Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Age of acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory & Cognition, 32, 31-38. doi:10.3758/BF03195818
103. Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2010). Impact of phonology on the generation of handwritten responses: Evidence from picture-word interference tasks. Memory & Cognition, 38, 519-528. doi:10.3758/MC.38.4.519