Campaigns and cliques: Variations in effectiveness of an antismoking campaign as a function of adolescent peer group identity

Journal of Health Communication

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1215-1231

  Moran, Meghan Bridgid ^a   Murphy, Sheila T ^b   Sussman, Steve ^c  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD BEHAVIOR; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SMOKING; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; PEER GROUP; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SMOKING; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 84870294967     PISSN: 10810730     EISSN: 10870415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2012.688246     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Aaker, D. A. (1995). Building strong brands. New York, NY: Free Press.
2. Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Beebe, M. (2002). "Alkie," "frat brother," and "jock": Perceived types of college students and stereotypes about drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 885-907.
3. Basu, A., & Wang, J. (2009). The role of branding in public health campaigns. Journal of Communication Management, 13, 77-91.
4. Bricker, J. B., Peterson, Jr., A. V., Sarason, I. G., Anderson, M. R., & Rajan, K. B. (2007). Changes in the influence of parents' and close friends' smoking on adolescent smoking transitions. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 740-747.
5. Brown, B. B. (1989). Social type ratings interview manual. Madison: Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
6. Cohen, J. (1979). High school subcultures and the adult world. Adolescence, 14, 491-502.
7. Cowell, A. J., Farrelly, M. C., Chou, R., & Vallone, D. M. (2009). Assessing the impact of the national "truth" antismoking campaign on beliefs, attitudes, and intent to smoke by race/ethnicity. Ethnicity and Health, 14, 75-91.
8. Dolcini, M. M., & Adler, N. E. (1994). Perceived competencies, peer group affiliation, and risk behavior among early adolescents. Health Psychology, 13, 496-506.
9. Downs, R. D., & Rose, S. R. (1991). The relationship of adolescent peer groups to the incidence of psychosocial problems. Adolescence, 26, 473-492.
10. Eckert, P. (1983). Beyond the statistics of adolescent smoking. American Journal of Public Health, 73, 439-441.
11. Ellickson, P. L., Perlman, M., & Klein, D. J. (2003) Explaining racial/ethnic differences in smoking during the transition to adulthood. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 913-931.
12. Evans, W. D., & Hastings, G. (2008). Public health branding: Applying marketing for social change. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
13. Evans, W. D., Wasserman, J., Bertoletti, E., & Martino, S. (2002). Branding behavior: The strategy behind the truth campaign. Social Marketing Quarterly, 8, 17-29.
14. Farrelly, M. C., Davis, K. C., Duke, J., & Messeri, P. (2009). Sustaining 'truth': Changes in youth tobacco attitudes and smoking intentions after 3 years of a national antismoking campaign. Health Education Research, 24, 42-48.
15. Farrelly, M. C., Davis, K. C., Haviland M. L., Messeri, P., & Healton, C. G. (2005). Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 425-431.
16. Farrelly, M. C., Davis, K. C., Yarsevich, J. M., Haviland, M. L., Hersey, J. C., & Girlando, M. E., (2002, June). Getting to the truth: Assessing youths' reactions to the truth® and "Think. Don't Smoke" tobacco counter marketing campaigns. Legacy First Look Report No. 9. Washington DC: American Legacy Foundation. Washington, DC: American Legacy Foundation.
17. Farrelly, M. C., Healton, C. G., Davis, K. C., Messeri, P., Hersey, J. C., & Haviland, C. G. (2002). Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 901-907.
18. Farrelly, M. C., Niederdeppe, J., & Yarsevich, J. (2003). Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: Past, present, and future directions. Tobacco Control, 12, i35-i47.
19. Farrelly, M. C., Nonnemaker, J., Davis, K. C., & Hussin, A. (2009). The influence of the national truth® campaign on smoking initiation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36, 379-384.
20. Flynn, B. S., Worden, J. K., Bunn, J. Y., Solomon, L. J., Ashikaga, T., Connolly, S. W., & Ramirez, A. G. (2010). Mass media interventions to reduce youth smoking prevalence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39, 53-62.
21. Glantz, S. A. (1996) Preventing tobacco use -The youth access trap. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 156-158.
22. Goldman, L. K., & Glantz, S. A. (1998). Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. JAMA, 279, 772-777.
23. Hicks, J. J. (2001). The strategy behind Florida's "truth" campaign. Tobacco Control, 10, 3-5.
24. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (Eds.). (1999). Social identity and social cognition. London, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
25. Holtgrave, D. R., Wunderink, K. A., Vallone, D. M., & Healton, C. G. (2009). Cost-utility analysis of the national truth® campaign to prevent youth smoking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36, 385-388.
26. Kipke, M. D., Montgomery, S. B., Simon, T. R., Unger, J. B., & Johnson, C. J. (1997). Homeless youth: Drug use patterns and HIV risk profiles according to peer group affiliation. AIDS and Behavior, 1, 247-259.
27. La Greca, A. M., Prinstein, M. J., & Fetter, M. D. (2001). Adolescent peer crowd affiliation: Linkages with health-risk behaviors and close friendships. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26, 131-143.
28. Leiss, W., Kline, S., Jhally, S., & Botterill, J. (2005). Social communication in advertising: Consumption in the mediated marketplace (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
29. Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., & Macgil, A. (2008). Writing, technology and teens. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
30. Moran, M. B. (2009). The role of social identity in adolescent smoking behavior. Paper presented at the 137th annual conference of the American Public Health Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, November.
31. Mosbach, P., & Leventhal, H. (1988). Peer group identification and smoking: Implications for intervention. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 238-245.
32. Niederdeppe, J., Farrelly, M. C., & Haviland, M. L. (2004). Confirming "truth": More evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 255-257.
33. Pechmann, C., & Reibling, E. T. (2000). Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: Case studies from USA and Canada. Tobacco Control, 9(Suppl. 2), 18-131.
34. Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., Goldberg, M. E., & Reibling, E. T. (2003). What to convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents: The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. Journal of Marketing, 67, 1-18.
35. Siegel, M. (1998). Mass media antismoking campaigns: A powerful tool for health promotion. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129, 128-132.
36. Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281-303.
37. Snyder, L. B., Hamilton, M. A., Mitchell, E. W., Kiwanuka-Tondo, J., Fleming-Milici, F., & Proctor, D. (2004). A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. Journal of Health Communication, 9, 71-96.
38. Stephenson, M. T., Hoyle, R. H., Palmgreen, P., & Slater, M. D. (2003). Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 72, 279-286.
39. Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., McAdams, L. A., Stacy, A. W., Burton, D., & Flay, B. R. (1994). Group self-identification and adolescent cigarette smoking: A 1-year prospective study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 10, 576-58.
40. Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., & McCullar, W. J. (2000). Group self-identification as a prospective predictor of drug use and violence in high-risk youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 192-196.
41. Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., Simon, T. R., Stacy, A. W., Burton, D., & Flay, B. R. (1993). Identification of which high-risk youth smoke cigarettes regularly. Health Values, 17, 42-53.
42. Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., Stacy, A. W., Burciaga, C., Raynor, A., Turner, G. E., Flay, B. R. (1990). Peer group association and adolescent tobacco use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 349-352.
43. Sussman, S., Moran, M. B., & Pokhrel, P. (2012). Group identification. In R. J. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence. (pp. 1237-1240). New York, NY: Springer.
44. Sussman, S., Pokhrel, P., Ashmore, R. D., & Brown, B. B. (2007). Adolescent peer group identification and characteristics: A review of the literature. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 1602-1627.
45. Sussman, S., Simon, T. R., Stacy, A. W., Dent, C. W., Ritt, A., Kipke, M. D., Flay, B. R. (1999). The association of group self-identification and adolescent drug use in three samples varying in risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29,1555-1581.
46. Sussman, S., Unger, J., & Dent, W. (2004). Peer group self-identification among alternative high school youth: A predictor of their psychosocial functioning five years later. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 4, 9-25.
47. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13, 65-93.
48. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparisons. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 61-76). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press.
49. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-147). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
50. Turner, J. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Speers, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, context (pp. 6-34). Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
51. Urberg, K. A. (1992). Locus of peer influence: Social crowd and best friend. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 439-450.
52. Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., Tolson, J. M., & Halliday-Scher, K. (2000). Adolescent social crowds: Measurement and relationship to friendships. Journal of Adolescence Research, 15, 427-445.
53. Vallone, D. M., Allen, J. A., & Xiao, H. (2009). Is socioeconomic status associated with awareness of and receptivity to the truth campaign? Drug and Alcohol Dependence 104(Suppl. 1), S115-S120.
54. Verkooijen, K. T. de Vries, N. K., & Nielsen, G. A. (2007). Youth crowds and substance use: The impact of perceived group norm and multiple group identification. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(1), 55-61.