The Influence of the National truth® Campaign on Smoking Initiation

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 379-384

  Farrelly, Matthew C ^a   Nonnemaker, James ^a   Davis, Kevin C ^a   Hussin, Altijani ^a  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT SMOKING; ADVERTIZING; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; CHILD; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HIGH SCHOOL; HISPANIC; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; RISK REDUCTION; SCHOOL CHILD; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM; SMOKING HABIT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CHILD; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; SMOKING; SOCIAL MARKETING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 64049103211     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.019     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. National Cancer Institute. The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19. NIH Pub. No. 07-6242 (2008), USDHHS, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD
2. Emery S., Wakefield M.A., Terry-McElrath Y., et al. Televised state-sponsored antitobacco advertising and youth smoking beliefs and behavior in the United States, 1999-2000. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 159 (2005) 639-645
3. Farrelly M.C., Davis K.C., Haviland M.L., et al. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 95 (2005) 425-431
4. Wakefield M., Flay B., Nichter M., and Giovino G. Effects of anti-smoking advertising on youth smoking: a review. J Health Commun 8 (2003) 229-247
5. Farrelly M.C., Niederdeppe J., and Yarsevich J. Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: past, present, and future directions. Tob Control 12 1S (2003) i35-i47
6. Hornik R.C. Public health communication: evidence for behavior change (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
7. Siegel M., and Biener L. The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: results of a longitudinal youth study. Am J Public Health 90 (2000) 380-386
8. Sly D.F., Trapido E., and Ray S. Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Prev Med 35 (2002) 511-518
9. Farrelly M.C., Healton C.G., Davis K.C., Messeri P., Hersey J.C., and Haviland M.L. Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health 92 (2002) 901-907
10. Wakefield M., Terry-McElrath Y., Emery S., et al. Effect of televised, tobacco company-funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions, and behavior. Am J Public Health 96 (2006) 2154-2160
11. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Evaluation of the national youth anti-drug media campaign: 2004 report of findings (2006), National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda MD
12. Bauer U.E., Johnson T.M., Hopkins R.S., and Brooks R.G. Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998-2000. JAMA 284 (2000) 723-728
13. Sly D.F., Hopkins R.S., Trapido E., et al. Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida 'truth' campaign. Am J Public Health 91 (2001) 233-238
14. Sly D.F., Heald G.R., and Ray S. The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tob Control 10 (2001) 9-15
15. Healton C. Who's afraid of the truth?. Am J Public Health 91 (2001) 554-558
16. Elliott D. Anti-tobacco ads. All Things Considered, NPR, February 16, 2000. www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1070437
17. Farrelly M.C., Davis K.C., and Yarsevich J.M. First Look Report 9. Getting to the truth: assessing youths' reactions to truth and think. Don't smoke tobacco countermarketing campaigns (2002), American Legacy Foundation, Washington DC
18. Thrasher J.F., Niederdeppe J., Farrelly M.C., Davis K.C., Ribisl K.M., and Haviland M.L. The impact of anti-tobacco industry prevention messages in tobacco producing regions: evidence from the US truth campaign. Tob Control 13 (2004) 283-288
19. Hersey J.C., Niederdeppe J., Evans W.D., et al. The effects of state counterindustry media campaigns on beliefs, attitudes, and smoking status among teens and young adults. Prev Med 37 6 Pt 1 (2003) 544-552
20. sm campaign. J Health Commun 9 (2004) 425-441
21. Farrelly M.C., Davis K.C., Duke J., and Messeri P. Sustaining 'truth': changes in youth tobacco attitudes and smoking intentions after 3 years of a national antismoking campaign. Health Educ Res 24 (2009) 42-48
22. Davis K.C., Nonnemaker J., and Farrelly M.C. Association between national smoking prevention campaigns and perceived smoking prevalence among youth in the United States. J Adolesc Health 41 (2007) 430-436
23. Moskowitz J.M. Impact of the "truth" campaign on cigarette smoking [eletter]. Am J Public Health, Mar 31, 2005. www.ajph.org/cgi/eletters/95/3/425#
24. U.S. Department of Labor. National Longitudinal Survey Handbook, 2005 (2005), U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington DC
25. Terry-McElrath Y.M., Wakefield M.A., Emery S., et al. State anti-tobacco advertising and smoking outcomes by gender and race/ethnicity. Ethn Health 12 (2007) 339-362
26. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development (1979), Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA
27. Allison P.D. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. In: Leinhardt S. (Ed). Sociological methodology 1982 (1982), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 61-98
28. Singer J.D., and Willett J.B. Applied longitudinal data analysis (2003), Oxford University Press, London
29. Hersey J., Niederdeppe J., Ng S.W., Mowery P., Farrelly M., and Messeri P. How state counter-industry campaigns help prime perceptions of tobacco industry practices to promote reductions in youth smoking. Tob Control 14 (2005) 377-383
30. Wakefield M., Szczypka G., Terry-McElrath Y.M., et al. Mixed messages on tobacco: comparative exposure to public health, tobacco company- and pharmaceutical company-sponsored tobacco-related television campaigns in the United States, 1999-2003. Addiction 100 (2005) 1875-1883
31. Slater M.D. Operationalizing and analyzing exposure: the foundation of media effects research. Journalism Mass Comm Q 81 (2004) 168-183
32. Messeri P.A., Allen J.A., Mowery P.D., et al. Do tobacco countermarketing campaigns increase adolescent under-reporting of smoking?. Addict Behav 32 (2007) 1532-1536
33. Pomerleau O.F., Collins A.C., Shiffman S., and Pomerleau C.S. Why some people smoke and others do not: new perspectives. J Consult Clin Psychol 61 (1993) 723-731
34. CDC. Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs-2007 (2007), USDHHS, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta GA
35. Niederdeppe J., Farrelly M.C., Hersey J.C., and Davis K.C. Consequences of dramatic reductions in state tobacco control funds: Florida, 1998-2000. Tob Control 17 (2008) 205-210
36. Provance J. Foundation ties to block seizure of old tobacco funds. State wants $190M for jobs plan. Toledo Blade June 3, 2008. www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080603/NEWS24/806030393
37. Fiore M.C., Jaen C.R., and Baker T.B. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical practice guideline (2008), USDHHS, Rockville MD