Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns

JAMA

Volumn 279, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 772-777

  Goldman, Lisa K ^a   Glantz, Stanton A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JUVENILE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PASSIVE SMOKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; TOBACCO INDUSTRY;

EID: 0032507212     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.10.772     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Traynor MP, Glantz SA. California's tobacco tax initiative. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996;21:543-585.
2. Koh HK. An analysis of the successful 1992 Massachusetts tobacco tax initiative. Tob Control. 1996; 5:220-225.
3. Begay M. The campaign to raise the tobacco tax in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:968-973.
4. Begay M, Glantz S. Question 1: tobacco education expenditures in Massachusetts, USA. Tob Control. 1997;6:213-218.
5. Ross M. Tobacco Tax Campaigns: A Case Study of Two States. Washington, DC: The Advocacy Institute; 1996.
6. Honig B, Kizer K. Toward a Tobacco-Free California. Sacramento: California Dept of Health Services;1990.
7. Arizona Department of Health Services. Arizona Tobacco Education and Prevention Program, Legislative Report, Fiscal Year 1996. Phoenix: Arizona Dept of Health Services; Fall 1996.
8. Friedman M. Teen Antismoking Strategy Focus Groups, Summary Report. Los Angeles, Calif: Mara Friedman Research Management and Strategic Planning; November 1996.
9. Lachman Research and Marketing Services. Reactions to Smoking-Related Issues Among California Smokers and Non-Smokers, Focus Group Study. Los Angeles, Calif: Lachman Research and Marketing Services; September 1993.
10. Lachman Research and Marketing Services. California Department of Health Services Antismoking Creative Evaluation, Report of Focus Group Findings. Los Angeles, Calif: Lachman Research and Marketing Services; 1995.
11. Qualitative Research Centre. Tobacco Education Research, Presentation Draft. Culver City, Calif: Qualitative Research Centre; 1990.
12. Qualitative Research Centre. Antismoking Study, Creative Development Research, Phase Two. Culver City, Calif: Qualitative Research Centre; 1992.
13. Trotta Associates. Qualitative Research for the Clifford Antismoking Campaign. Los Angeles, Calif: Trotta Associates; 1993.
14. Houston Herstek Favat. An Examination of Tobacco Industry Manipulation Positioning Among Youths, Summary Report. Boston, Mass: Houston Herstek Favat.
15. Houston Herstek Favat. Exploratory Research Adult Smokers, Age 18 to 34. Boston, Mass: Houston Herstek Favat.
16. Houston Herstek Favat. Youth Exploratory 1996, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Presentation of Findings. Boston, Mass: Houston Herstek Favat; March 1996.
17. Nordhaus Research I. Smoking Cessation Focus Groups. Southfield, Mich: Nordhaus Research Inc; May 1995.
18. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Media Campaign Resource Book. Atlanta, Ga: US Dep of Health and Human Services; November 1995.
19. Masking J, Kendrick A. Successful Advertising Research Methods. Lincolnwood, Ill: NTC Business Books; 1993.
20. Tobacco Institute. The Tax Burden on Tobacco. Washington, DC: The Tobacco Institute; 1995:33.
21. Monardi FM, Balbach ED, Aguinaga S, Glantz SA. Shifting Allegiances. San Francisco: Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; April 1996.
22. Begay M, Glantz S. Question 1: Tobacco Education Outlays From the 1994 Fiscal Year to the 1996 Fiscal Year. Amherst: University of Massachusetts School of Public Health and Health Sciences; August 1995.
23. Bal DG, Kiser KW, Felten PG, Mozar HN, Niemeyer D. Reducing tobacco consumption in California. JAMA. 1990;264:1570-1574.
24. Flynn BS, Worden JK, Secer-Walker RH, Badger GJ, Geller BM, Costanza MC. Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:827-834.
25. Flynn BS, Worden JK, Seeker-Walker RH, et al. Mass media and school interventions for cigarette smoking prevention. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1148-1150.
26. Flynn BS, Worden JK, Seeker-Walker RH, Pirie PL, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH. Long-term responses of higher and lower risk youths to smoking prevention interventions. Prev Med. 1997;26:389-394.
27. Worden JK, Flynn BS, Solomon LJ, Seeker-Walker RH, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH. Using mass media to prevent cigarette smoking among adolescent girls. Health Educ Q. 1996;23:453-468.
28. Murray DM, Prokhorov AV, Harty KC. Effects of a statewide antismoking campaign on mass media messages and smoking beliefs. Prev Med. 1994;23: 54-60.
29. Pierce JP, Farkas AJ, Evans N, et al. Tobacco Use in California 1992. Sacramento: California Dept of Health Services; 1993.
30. Pierce JP, Evans N, Farkas AJ, et al. Tobacco Use in California. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego; 1994.
31. Popham WJ, Potter LD, Bal DG, Johnson MD, Duerr JM, Quinn V. Do antismoking media campaigns help smokers quit? Public Health Rep. 1993; 108:510-513.
32. Popham WJ, Potter LD, Hetrick MA, Muthen LK, Duerr JM, Johnson MD. Effectiveness of the 1990-1991 tobacco education media campaign. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:319-326.
33. Glantz SA. Changes in cigarette consumption, prices, and tobacco industry revenues associated with California's Proposition 99. Tob Control. 1993; 2:311-314.
34. Skolnick A. Court orders governor to restore antismoking media campaign funding. JAMA. 1992; 267:2721-2723.
35. Balbach E, Monardi F, Fox B, Glantz S. Holding Government Accountable. San Francisco: Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; June 1997.
36. Glantz S. Alternative models for controlling smoking among adolescents: Glantz responds. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:870-871.
37. Hu T-W, Sung H-Y, Keeler TE. Reducing cigarette consumption in California. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1218-1222.
38. Hu T-W, Sung H-Y, Keeler TE. The state antismoking campaign and the industry response. Am Econ Assoc Pap Proc. 1995;85:85-90.
39. Johnson CA, Cruz TB, Jacqueline S, Gunning G, Hennesy M. Evaluation of the Tobacco Industry's Response to the California Tobacco Education, Final Report to the California Department of Health Services. Los Angeles, Calif: University of Southern California; December 1994.
40. Harris JE, Connolly GN, Davis B. Cigarette smoking before and after an excise tax increase and an antismoking campaign - Massachusetts, 1993-1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45:966-970.
41. Houston Herstek Favat. An Assesment of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program Youth Prevention Campaign. Boston, Mass: Houston Herstek Favat.
42. McKenna JW. The promise of advertising and media advocacy for tobacco control. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:378-379.
43. Honig B, Coye MJ. Toward a Tobacco-Free California. Sacramento: California Dept of Health Services; April 1992.
44. Blum A. Paid counter-advertising: proven strategy to combat tobacco use and prevention. Prev Med. 1994;10:8-10.
45. Scott S. Smoking out tobacco's influence. Calif J. 1997:14-18.
46. Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee. Toward a Tobacco-Free Califomia: Renewing the Commitment, 1997-2000. Sacramento, Calif: Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee; July 31, 1997.
47. Federal Trade Commission. Staff Report of the Cigarette Advertising Investigation. Washington, DC: US Federal Trade Commission; 1981.
48. McKenna JW, Williams KN. Grafting effective tobacco counteradvertisements: lessons from a failed campaign directed at teenagers. Public Health Rep. 1993;106:85-89.
49. Steele C. Letter to Colleen Stevens. Los Angeles: Tobacco Control Section, California Dept of Health Services; December 4, 1996.
50. Keye P. What Don't We Know, and When Haven't We Known It? Remarks for Health Communications Day. Baltimore, Md: The Johns Hopkins University; October 13, 1993.
51. Michigan Department of Community Health. Michigan Department of Community Health Paid Media Campaign as of November 1996. Lansing: Michigan Dept of Community Health; 1996.
52. Pechmann C, Shih C-F. How Smoking in Movies and Antismoking Ads Before Movies May Affect Teenagers' Perceptions of Peers Who Smoke. Irvine: University of California at Irvine; December 1996.
53. Pechmann C, Ratneshwar S. The effects of antismoking and cigarette advertising on young adolescents' perceptions of peers who smoke. J Consumer Res. 1994;21:236-251.
54. US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 1994.
55. Institute of Medicine. Growing Up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1994.
56. Pechmann C. Do antismoking ads combat underage smoking? a review of practices and research. In: Goldberg MG, Fishbein M, Middlestadt S, eds. Social Marketing: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997:189-216.
57. Glantz S. Preventing tobacco use: the youth access trap. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:156-158.
58. RJ Reynolds. Antismoking Advertising. Document produced in Mangini v RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co. Civil No. 939359.
59. Schwartz J. Unlikely allies opposed antismoking campaign: industry sought help from adversaries to fight funding for California ads, memo shows. Washington Post. January 20, 1998:A3.
60. Warren J, Morain D. Bid to dilute antismoking effort revealed: memo from 1990 shows tobacco executives wanted to use legislators, doctors, and poverty activists to divert money from TV ads. Los Angeles Times. January 21, 1998:A1.
61. Settlement Agreement in Florida v American Tobacco Co, Case No. 95-1466 AH, 1997.
62. Russell S. Smoking foes assail limits on health ads. San Francisco Chronicle. June 27, 1996:A16.
63. Skolnick A. Antitobacco advocates fight 'illegal' diversion of tobacco control money. JAMA. 1994; 271:1387-1390.
64. Skolnick A. Judge rules diversion of antismoking money illegal. JAMA. 1995;273:610-611.
65. Harty KC. Animals and butts: Minnesota's media campaign against tobacco. Tob Control. 1993;2: 271-274.