The importance of the anterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar disc arthroplasty: 36-Month follow-up experience in extreme lateral total disc replacement

International Journal of Spine Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 18-23

  Marchi, Luis ^a   Oliveira, Leonardo ^a   Coutinho, Etevaldo ^a   Pimenta, Luiz ^a  

^a Santa Rita Hospital   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Lateral approach; Minimally invasive; Total disc replacement; XLIF

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR LONGITUDINAL LIGAMENT; ARTHRALGIA; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LIGAMENT; LUMBAR DISK; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINE FUSION; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84870036618     PISSN: 22114599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Rajaraman V., Vingan R., Roth P., Heary R., Conklin L., Jacobs G. Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 1999, 1(Suppl):60-64.
2. Blumenthal S., McAfee P.C., Guyer R.D., et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005, 30:1565-1575.
3. Ozgur B.M., Aryan H.E., Pimenta L., Taylor W.R. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006, 6:435-443.
4. Rodgers W.B., Cox C.S., Gerber E.J. Experience and early results with a minimally invasive technique for anterior column support through eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). US Musculoskelet Rev 2007, 1:28-32.
5. Rodgers W.B., Cox C.S., Gerber E.J. Minimally invasive treatment (XLIF) of adjacent segment disease after prior lumbar fusions. Internet J Minim Invasive Spinal Technol 2009, 3.
6. Rodgers W.B., Cox C.S., Gerber E.J. Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010, 23:393-397.
7. Rodgers W.B., Cox C.S., Gerber E.J. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): an analysis of 600 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011, 36:26-32.
8. Pimenta L., Oliveira L., Schaffa T., Coutinho E., Marchi L. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2011, 14:38-45.
9. Bertagnoli R., Yue J.J., Shah R.V., et al. The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005, 30:2230-2236.
10. Le Huec J.C., Mathews H., Basso Y., et al. Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 2005, 36:315-322.
11. Sasso R.C., Foulk D.M., Hahn M. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33:123-131.
12. Zigler J., Delamarter R., Spivak J.M., et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007, 32:1155-1162.
13. Pimenta L., Schaffa T.D. Surgical technique: eXtreme lateral interbody fusion. eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) 2008, 87-104. Quality Medical Publishing, St Louis. J.A. Goodrich, I.J. Volcan (Eds.).
14. Huang R.C., Tropiano P., Marnay T., Girardi F.P., Lim M.R., Cammisa F.P. Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement. Spine J 2006, 6:242-247.
15. Lemaire J.P., Carrier H., Ali E.H.S., Skalli W., Lavasate F., Lavaste F. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005, 18:353-359.
16. Denozière G., Ku D.N. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech 2006, 39:766-775.
17. Marshman L.A.G., Friesem T., Rampersaud Y.R., Le Huec J.C., Krishna M. Subsidence and malplacement with the Oblique Maverick Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: technical note. Spine J 2008, 8:650-655.
18. Grant J.P., Oxland T.R., Dvorak M.F. Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001, 26:889-896.
19. Hurley M.V., Newham D.J. The influence of arthrogenous muscle inhibition on quadriceps rehabilitation of patients with early, unilateral osteoarthritic knees. Br J Rheumatol 1993, 32:127-131.
20. Oliveira L., Marchi L., Coutinho E., Pimenta L. Biomechanics of disc arthroplasty: what can be done to improve results: present and future perspectives. The Spine Journal 2010, 10:S132.
21. Zeegers W.S., Bohnen L.M.U., Laaper M., Verhaegen M.J. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999, 8:210-217.
22. Geisler F.H., Blumenthal S.L., Guyer R.D., McAfee P.C., Regan J.J., Johnson J.P., Mullin B. Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 2004, 1:143-154.
23. Pimenta L., Díaz R.C., Guerrero L.G. Charité lumbar artificial disc retrieval: use of a lateral minimally invasive technique. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2006, 5:556-561.
24. Park S.J., Kang K.J., Shin S.K., Chung S.S., Lee C.S. Heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disc replacement. Int Orthop 2011, 35:1197-1201.
25. Rundell S.A., Auerbach J.D., Balderston R.A., Kurtz S.M. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008, 33:2510-2517.
26. White A., Panjabi M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine 2001, JB Lippincott, Philadelphia. 2nd ed.