Subsidence and malplacement with the Oblique Maverick Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: technical note

Spine Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 650-655

  Marshman, Laurence A G ^a   Friesem, Tai ^a   Rampersaud, Y Raja ^b   Le Huec, Jean Charles ^c   Krishna, Manoj ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH TEES   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Oblique Maverick; Subsidence

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR DISK; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 46149102988     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.03.010     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer R, et al. Randomised control trial of the Cahrite artificial disc vs fusion for single level lumbar degenerative disc disease: a two year follow-up study. Presented at the Spinal Arthroplasty Society Meeting, May 1-4, 2006, Vienna, Austria.
2. Guyer R.D., Burd T.A., Hochschuler S.H., and McAfee P.C. Total disc replacement: implants and clinical results. In: Guyer R.D., and Zigler J.E. (Eds). Spinal arthroplasty, a new era in spine care (2005), Quality Medical Publishing Inc, St. Louis, MO 180-222
3. McAfee P.C., Cunningham B., Holsapple G., et al. A prospective randomised multicentre food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. Part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30 (2005) 1576-1583
4. Fujiwara A., Tamai K., An H.S., et al. Orientation and osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 385 (2001) 88-94
5. Smith H.E., Vaccaro A.R., Yuan P.S., Papadoploulos S., and Sasso R. The use of computerized image guidance in lumbar disk arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 19 (2006) 22-27
6. Pfirrman C.W.A., Metzdorf A., Zanetti M., Hodler J., and Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26 (2001) 1873-1878
7. Cinotti G., David T., and Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21 (1996) 995-1000
8. Zeegers W.S., Bohnen L.M., Laaper M., et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8 (1999) 210-217
9. Oskouian Jr. R.J., and Johnson J.P. Vascular complications in anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstruction. J Neurosurg 96 1 Suppl (2002) 1-5
10. Mathews H.H., Eisermann L., Le Huec J.-C., and Friesem T. Total disc arthroplasty using Maverick total disc replacement. In: Guyer R.D., and Zigler J.E. (Eds). Spinal arthroplasty, a new era in spine care (2005), Quality Medical Publishing Inc, St. Louis, MO 224-238
11. Gertzbein S.D., Holtby R., Tile M., et al. Determination of a locus of instantaneous centers of roatation of the lumbar spine by Moiré fringes: a new technique. Spine 9 (1984) 409-413
12. Seligman J.V., Getzbein S.D., Tile M., et al. Computer analysis of spinal segment motion in degenerative disc disease with and without axial loading. Spine 9 (1984) 566-573
13. Lemaire JP. Charite III intervertebral disc prosthesis clinical and radiological results with a series of 100 cases over 10 years follow up. Presented at the Spinal Arthroplasty Society Meeting, May 1-3, Scottsdale, AZ.
14. Dooris A.P., Goel V.K., Grosland N.M., et al. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 26 (2001) 122-129
15. Patel V.V., Andrews C., Pradhan B.B., et al. Computed tomography assessment of the accuracy of in vivo placement of artificial discs in the lumbar spine including radiographic and clinical consequences. Spine 31 (2006) 948-953
16. Gercek E., Arlet V., Delisle J., and Marchesi D. Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning. Eur Spine J 12 (2003) 513-516