Heterotopic ossification following lumbar total disc replacement

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1197-1201

  Park, Se Jun ^a   Kang, Kyung Jung ^a   Shin, Seong Kee ^a   Chung, Sung Soo ^a   Lee, Chong Suh ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; LUMBAR DISK; LUMBAR TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSIFICATION, HETEROTOPIC; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREVALENCE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80555157701     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1095-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. YJ BR, Naveiva R, Fenk-Mayer A, Husted DS, Shah RV, Emerson JW (2006) Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: A prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period. J Neurosurg Spine 4:85-90 (Pubitemid 47325296)
2. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R Jr, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: Part I: Evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565-1575, discussion E1387-1591 (Pubitemid 41024950)
3. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629-1632
4. Buttner-Janz K, Schellnack K (1990) Intervertebral disk endoprosthesis- development and current status. Beitr Orthop Traumatol 37:137-147
5. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS (2006) Lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: A prospective study with a 2-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:411-415 (Pubitemid 44197592)
6. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21:995-1000 (Pubitemid 26127221)
7. Fransen M, Neal B (2004) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for preventing heterotopic bone formation after hip arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001160
8. Geisler FH (2005) Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc. Neurosurgery 56:46- 57, discussion 46-57
9. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K, LeMaire JP, Zeegers WS (1994) A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine 19:1842-1849 (Pubitemid 24314197)
10. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Lim MR, Tropiano P, Marnay T (2005) Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 30:1407-1411 (Pubitemid 41754864)
11. Kerr EJ, Jawahar A, Kay S, Cavanaugh DA, PD N (2009) Implant design may influence delayed heterotopic ossification after total disk arthroplasty in lumbar spine. Surg Neurol 72:747-751
12. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174 (Pubitemid 8054849)
13. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el H, Skalli W, Lavaste F (2005) Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: A 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:353-359 (Pubitemid 44378153)
14. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, Dmietriev A, Maxwell JH, Regan JJ, Isaza J (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: Part II: Evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1576-1583, discussion E1388- 1590 (Pubitemid 41022418)
15. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J (2003) Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:384-389
16. Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, Barsa P, Sourkova P, Hradil J, Korge A, Mayer HM (2006) Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2802-2806
17. Neal B, Rodgers A, Dunn L, Fransen M (2000) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for preventing heterotopic bone formation after hip arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001160
18. Ogon M, Howanietz N, Tuschel A, Chavanne A, Meissner J, Becker S (2007) Implantation of the ProDisc intervertebral disk prosthesis for the lumbar spine. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:209-230 (Pubitemid 47097160)
19. Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Gross C, Tohtz SW, Khodadadyan- Klostermann C, Perka C, Kandziora F (2006) Charite total disc replacement-clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15:183-195
20. Regan JJ (2005) Clinical results of charite lumbar total disc replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 36:323-340 (Pubitemid 40805093)
21. Ritter MA, Vaughan RB (1977) Ectopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. Predisposing factors, frequency, and effect on results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:345-351 (Pubitemid 8088663)
22. Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW, Eng M, McAfee PC, Holsapple GA, Adams KA (2007) Prevalence of heterotopic ossification following total disc replacement. A prospective, randomized study of two hundred and seventy-six patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:82-88 (Pubitemid 46059146)
23. van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement: A report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369-383