Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: An analysis of 600 cases

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 26-32

  Rodgers, W Blake ^a   Gerber, Edward J ^a   Patterson, Jamie ^a  

^a Spine Midwest Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; lumbar degenerative disease; minimally invasive surgery; outcomes; XLIF

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INJURY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PEDICLE SCREW; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE STABILIZATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MISSOURI; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; TIME FACTORS; TRAUMA, NERVOUS SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78751550799     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e1040a     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kalanithi PS, Patil CG, Boakye M. National complication rates and disposition after posterior lumbar fusion for acquired spondylolisthesis. Spine 2009;34:1963-9.
2. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR, et al. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:2089-92.
3. Kimura I, Shingu H, Murata M, et al. Lumbar posterolateral fusion alone or with transpedicular instrumentation in L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 2001;14:301-310.
4. DiPaola CP, Molinari RW. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16:130-9.
5. Krishna M, Pollock RD, Bhatia C. Incidence, etiology, classifi cation, and management of neuralgia after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery in 226 patients. Spine J 2008;8:374-9.
6. Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, et al. Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:304-9. (Pubitemid 47325460)
7. Zheng F, Cammisa FP, Sandhu HS, et al. Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion and segmental instrumentation. Spine. 2002;27:818-24.
8. Yang SH, Wu CC, Chen PQ. Postoperative meralgia paresthetica after posterior spine surgery. Spine 2005;30:E547-50.
9. Scaduto AA, Gamradt SC, Hwang J, et al. Perioperative complications of threaded cylindrical lumbar interbody fusion devices: anterior versus posterior approach. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:502-7.
10. Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with longterm follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;9:560-5.
11. Park P, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E16.
12. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, et al. Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumber interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degenerations and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:92-7.
13. Rihn JA, Patel R, Makda J, et al. Complications associated with singlelevel transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2009;9:623-9.
14. Sasso RC, Best NM, Mummaneni PV, et al. Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Spine 2005;30:670-4.
15. Fantini GA, Pappou IP, Girardi FP, et al. Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 2007;32:2751-8.
16. Brau SA, Delamarter RB, Schiffman ML, et al. Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery. Spine J 2004;4:409-12.
17. Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P, et al. Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 1999;91:60-4.
18. Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15:321-9.
19. Bergey DL, Villavicencio AT, Goldstein T, et al. Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 2004;29:1681-8.
20. Kim JS, Kang BU, Lee SH, et al. Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fi xation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009;22:114-21.
21. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 2006;26:435-43.
22. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ. Experience & early results with a minimally invasive technique for anterior column support through extreme lateral interbody fusion: XLIF® . US Musculoskeletal Review 2007;1:28-32.
23. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ. Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in the obese. J Spinal Disorder Tech 2010;23:393-7.
24. Knight RQ, Schwaegler P, Hanscom D, et al. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profi le. J Spinal Disord Tech 2009;22:34-7.
25. Kim KT, Lee SH, Lee YH, et al. Clinical outcomes of 3 fusion methods through the posterior approach in the lumbar spine. Spine 2006;31:1351-7.
26. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, et al. Complications in posterior fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine 2007;32:2232-7.
27. Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, et al. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratifi ed by specifi c diagnostic indication. Spine J 2009;9:13-21.
28. Molinari RW, Gerlinger T. Functional outcomes of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in active-duty US servicemen. Spine J 2001;1:215-24.
29. Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study of complications after facet joint excision and pedicle screw fi xation in 148 cases. Acta Orthop 1999;70:329-34.
30. Barnes B, Rodts GE, Haid R, et al. Allograft implants for posterior lumbar interbody fusion: results comparing cylindrical dowels and impacted wedges. Neurosurgery 2002;51:1191-8.
31. Podichetty VK, Spears J, Isaacs RE, et al. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:161-6.
32. Kaiser MG, Haid RW, Subach BR, et al. Comparison of mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 2002;51:97-105.
33. Zdeblick TA, David SM. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion. Spine 2000;25:2682-7.
34. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ. Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery. Spine In press.
35. Tosteson ANA, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:845-53.
36. Rodgers WB, Patterson JP. Grade 2 spondylolisthesis at L4-5 treated by XLIF: complications and early results in the "worst case scenario." Submitted for publication.