Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: Clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up: Clinical article

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 38-45

  Pimenta, Luiz ^a,b   Oliveira, Leonardo ^a   Schaffa, Thomas ^a   Coutinho, Etevaldo ^a   Marchi, Luis ^a  

^a Minimally Invasive and Reconstructive Spine Surgery   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Extreme lateral interbody fusion; Lateral approach; Minimally invasive surgery; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICE; DISKOGRAPHY; EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; LUMBAR SPINE; LUMBAR TOTAL DISK REPLACEMENT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PSOAS MUSCLE; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROPERITONEUM; SHORT FORM 36; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL DISK REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650843466     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: 15475646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09865     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, et al: The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 30:2230-2236, 2005
2. Bertagnoli R, Zigler J, Karg A, Voigt S: Complications and strategies for revision surgery in total disc replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 36:389-395, 2005 (Pubitemid 40805100)
3. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, et al: A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565-1575, 2005
4. David T: Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 32:661-666, 2007
5. Denozière G, Ku DN: Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech 39:766-775, 2006 (Pubitemid 43139004)
6. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, Gilbertson LG, Wilder DG: Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 26:E122-E129, 2001
7. Erkan S, Rivera Y, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE: Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 9:830-835, 2009
8. Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, et al: Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charité intervertebral disc. J Neurosurg Spine 1:143-154, 2004
9. Gornet MF, Mathews HH, Burkus JK, Johnson DR, Rahn KA, Peloza JH, et al: Maverick total disc replacement: initial report of 24-month clinical outcomes from six investigational centers. Spine J 6 (Issue 5, Suppl 1):66S, 2006
10. Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF: Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine 26:889-896, 2001
11. Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, et al: Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9:374-386, 2009
12. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Tropiano PT, Marnay T: Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:435-440, 2003 (Pubitemid 43020716)
13. Huang RC, Tropiano P, Marnay T, Girardi FP, Lim MR, Cammisa FP Jr: Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement. Spine J 6:242-247, 2006
14. Le Huec JC, Mathews H, Basso Y, Aunoble S, Hoste D, Bley B, et al: Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 36:315-322, 2005
15. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali H, Skalli W, Lavaste F: Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:353-359, 2005
16. Lim MR, Girardi FP, Zhang K, Huang RC, Peterson MG, Cammisa FP Jr: Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:252-256, 2005 (Pubitemid 43085862)
17. Marshman LAG, Friesem T, Rampersaud YR, Le Huec JC, Krishna M: Subsidence and malplacement with the Oblique Maverick Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: technical note. Spine J 8:650-655, 2008
18. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, et al: A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1576-1583, 2005 (Pubitemid 41022418)
19. McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Saiedy SS, Moore SV, Regan JJ, Guyer RD, et al: Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE Artificial Disc. Spine 31:1217-1226, 2006 (Pubitemid 43756296)
20. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435-443, 2006
21. Patel AA, Brodke DS, Pimenta L, Bono CM, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, et al: Revision strategies in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Spine 33:1276-1283, 2008
22. Pimenta L, Díaz RC, Guerrero LG: Charité lumbar artificial disc retrieval: use of a lateral minimally invasive technique. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 5:556-561, 2006 (Pubitemid 47325346)
23. Pimenta L, Schaffa TD: Surgical technique: eXtreme lateral interbody fusion, in Goodrich JA, Volcan IJ (eds): eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing, 2008, pp 87-104
24. Rajaraman V, Vingan R, Roth P, Heary R, Conklin L, Jacobs G: Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg 91 (1 Suppl):60-64, 1999
25. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ: Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:393-397, 2010
26. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ: Experience and early results with a minimally invasive technique for anterior column support through eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). Touch Briefings: US Musculoskeletal Review 1:28-32, 2007 http://www.touchmusculoskeletal.com/files/article-pdfs/rodgers.pdf [Accessed September 24, 2010]
27. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ: Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): An analysis of 600 cases. Spine J [in press], 2010
28. Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ: Minimally invasive treatment (XLIF) of adjacent segment disease after prior lumbar fusions. Internet Journal of Minimally Invasive Spinal Technology. http://www.ispub.com/journal/the-internet- journal-of-minimally-invasive-spinal-technology/volume-3-number-4-1/article/ minimally-invasive-treatment-xlif-of-adjacent-segment-disease-after-prior- lumbar-fusions.html [Accessed September 24, 2010]
29. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G: Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 30:738-743, 2005
30. Rundell SA, Auerbach JD, Balderston RA, Kurtz SM: Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains. Spine 33:2510-2517, 2008
31. Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M: Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Spine 33:123-131, 2008
32. Scott-Young M: Strategy for revision disc replacement surgery, in McAfee P, Geisler F, Scott-Young M (eds): Roundtables in Spine Surgery. Vol 1, No 2. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 2005
33. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Marnay T: Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:490-496, 2005 (Pubitemid 40314996)
34. White A, Panjabi M: Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, ed 2. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 2001
35. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, Verhaegen MJ: Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8:210-217, 1999
36. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO III, Haider TT, et al: Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155-1163, 2007