Effect of vertical misfit on strain within screw-retained implant titanium and zirconia frameworks

Journal of Prosthodontic Research

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 102-109

  Abduo, Jaafar ^a   Lyons, Karl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; CNC milling; Distortion; Framework fit; Strain gauge

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869877619     PISSN: 18831958     EISSN: 22124632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2011.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Taylor T.D. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998, 79:74-78.
2. Schwarz M.S. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000, 11:156-158.
3. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983, 49:843-848.
4. Abduo J., Bennani V., Lyons K., Waddell N., Swain M. A novel in vitro approach to assess the fit of implant frameworks. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011, 22:658-663.
5. Karl M., Rosch S., Graef F., Taylor T.D., Heckmann S.M. Strain situation after fixation of three-unit ceramic veneered implant superstructures. Implant Dent 2005, 14:157-165.
6. Hegde R., Lemons J.E., Broome J.C., McCracken M.S. Validation of strain gauges as a method of measuring precision of fit of implant bars. Implant Dent 2009, 18:151-161.
7. Kunavisarut C., Lang L.A., Stoner B.R., Felton D.A. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. J Prosthodont 2002, 11:30-40.
8. Brånemark P.I. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983, 50:399-410.
9. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991, 6:270-276.
10. Karl M., Winter W., Taylor T.D., Heckmann S.M. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004, 19:30-37.
11. Sahin S., Cehreli M.C. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent 2001, 10:85-92.
12. Ortorp A., Jemt T., Back T., Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003, 16:194-200.
13. Takahashi T., Gunne J. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2003, 89:256-260.
14. Ortorp A., Jemt T. CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: a 10-year comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009, 10.1111/j. 1708-8208.2009.00232.x.
15. Abduo J., Lyons K., Waddell N., Bennani V., Swain M. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011, 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00334.x.
16. Denry I., Kelly J.R. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008, 24:299-307.
17. Sailer I., Pjetursson B.E., Zwahlen M., Hammerle C.H. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II. Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007, 18:86-96.
18. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994, 5:142-147.
19. White G.E. Osseointegrated dental technology 1993, Quintessence, Chicago, p. 95-129.
20. Romero G.G., Engelmeier R., Powers J.M., Canterbury A.A. Accuracy of three corrective techniques for implant bar fabrication. J Prosthet Dent 2000, 84:602-607.
21. Sartori I.A., Ribeiro R.F., Francischone C.E., de Mattos Mda G. In vitro comparative analysis of the fit of gold alloy or commercially pure titanium implant-supported prostheses before and after electroerosion. J Prosthet Dent 2004, 92:132-138.
22. Carr A.B. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992, 7:468-475.
23. Del'Acqua M.A., Arioli-Filho J.N., Compagnoni M.A., Mollo Fde A. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008, 23:226-236.
24. Jemt T. In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996, 11:151-158.
25. Clelland N.L., Papazoglou E., Carr A.B., Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant among implant overdenture bars with various levels of misfit. J Prosthodont 1995, 4:243-250.
26. Millington N.D., Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1. Stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. Int J Prosthodont 1995, 8:511-516.
27. Lindstrom H., Preiskel H. The implant-supported telescopic prosthesis: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001, 16:34-42.
28. Abreu R.T., Spazzin A.O., Noritomi P.Y., Consani R.L.X., Mesquita M.F. Influence of material of overdenture-retaining bar with vertical misfit on three-dimensional stress distribution. J Prosthodont 2010, 19:425-431.
29. al-Turki L.E., Chai J., Lautenschlager E.P., Hutten M.C. Changes in prosthetic screw stability because of misfit of implant-supported prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2002, 15:38-42.
30. Carr A.B., Gerard D.A., Larsen P.E. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996, 76:500-509.
31. Jemt T., Lekholm U., Johansson C.B. Bone response to implant-supported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: in vivo study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000, 2:129-137.
32. Jansen V.K., Conrads G., Richter E.J. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997, 12:527-540.
33. Winter W., Mohrle S., Holst S., Karl M. Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010, 25:947-952.