In Vitro Study on Passive Fit in Implant-Supported 5-unit Fixed Partial Dentures

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 30-37

  Karl, Matthias ^a   Winter, Werner ^a   Taylor, Thomas D ^b   Heckmann, Siegfried M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Cement retention; Implant bone interface; Intraoral bonding; Passive fit; Screw retention; Strain development; Superstructure accuracy

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; GOLD;

AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOUTH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROSTHESIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECORDING; REPARATIVE DENTISTRY; SAMPLING; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

AGED; CEMENTATION; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 1342322624     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;16:1-132.
2. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11: 216-222.
3. Jemt T, Carlsson L, Boss A, Jorneus L. In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: A comparative pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:413-417.
4. Smedberg JI, Nilner K, Rangert B, Svensson SA, Glantz PO. On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: A methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:55-63.
5. Clelland NL, Papazoglou E, Carr AB, Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant among implant overdenture bars with various levels of misfit. J Prosthodont 1995;4:243-250.
6. Clelland NL, Carr AB, Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant between as-cast and postsoldered implant frameworks for a five-implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthodont 1996;5:193-200.
7. Clelland NL, van Putten MC. Comparison of strains produced in a bone simulant between conventional cast and resin-luted implant frameworks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:793-799.
8. Pietrabissa R, Contro R, Quaglini V, Soncini M, Gionso L, Simion M. Experimental and computational approach for the evaluation of the biomechanical effects of dental bridge misfit. J Biomech 2000;33:1489-1495.
9. Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, Neuendorff G, Kirsch A. Analyses of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:209-218.
10. Kunavisarut C, Lang LA, Stoner BR, Felton DA. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. J Prosthodont 2002;11:30-40.
11. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-455.
12. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:468-475.
13. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:562-566.
14. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant-supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:555-561.
15. Hsu CC, Millstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:588-593.
16. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:68-75.
17. Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:503-509.
18. Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: Effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:885-888.
19. Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JL. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444-447.
20. Ma T, Nicholls JI, Rubenstein JE. Tolerance measurements of various implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:371-375.
21. Tan KBC. The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: Is there such a thing as passive fit? Ann Acad Med Singapore 1995;24:138-157.
22. Keith SE, Miller BH, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implant abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:369-378.
23. Cheshire PD, Hobkirk JA. An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:782-789.
24. Carr AB, Brunski JB, Hurley E. Effects of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional "gold" and plastic cylinders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:589-598.
25. Misch CE. Screw-retained versus cement-retained implant-supported prostheses. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:15-18.
26. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.
27. Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: Which is better? [current issues forum] Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-141.
28. Pietrabissa R, Gionso L, Quaglini V, Di Martino E, Simion M. An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw-versus cement-retained implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;1:448-457.
29. Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, Sorensen JA. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw-or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:239-246.
30. Keaveny TM, Guo XE, Wachtel EF, McMahon TA, Hayes WC. Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J Biomech 1994;27:1127-1136.
31. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:529-536.
32. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: Current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:66-75.