Strain situation after fixation of three-unit ceramic veneered implant superstructures

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 157-165

  Karl, Matthias ^a   Rösch, Silke ^a   Graef, Friedrich ^a   Taylor, Thomas D ^b   Heckmann, Siegfried M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c School of Dental Medicine   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ceramic veneering; Fixed partial denture; Passive fit; Strain gauge technique

Indexed keywords

GOLD; METAL;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; CEMENTATION; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTURE; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MECHANICAL STRESS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL MODEL; PLASTER CAST; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; TECHNIQUE; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL VENEERS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; PLASTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 21344467490     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000163809.37466.ac     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:216-222.
2. Clelland NL, Papazoglou E, Carr AB, et al. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant among implant overdenture bars with various levels of misfit. J Prosthodont. 1995;4:243-250.
3. Clelland NL, Carr AB, Gilat A. Comparison of strains transferred to a bone simulant between as-cast and postsoldered implant frameworks for a five implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthodont. 1996;5:193-200.
4. Clelland NL, van Putten MC. Comparison of strains produced in a bone simulant between conventional cast and resin-luted implant frameworks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:793-799.
5. Pietrabissa R, Gionso L, Quaglini V, et al. An in vitro study on compensation of mismatch of screw versus cement-retained implant supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2000;1:448-457.
6. Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, et al. Analyses of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:209-218.
7. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:448-455.
8. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:468-475.
9. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:562-566.
10. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, et al. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:555-561.
11. Hsu CC, Millstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:588-493.
12. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, et al. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:68-75.
13. Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, et al. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;69:503-509.
14. Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, et al. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:885-888.
15. Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JL. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:444-447.
16. Ma T, Nicholls JI, Rubenstein JE. Tolerance measurements of various implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:371-375.
17. Tan KB. The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: is there such a thing as passive fit? Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995;24:138-157.
18. Keith SE, Miller BH, Woody RD, et al. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:369-378.
19. Cheshire PD, Hobkirk JA. An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:782-789.
20. Carr AB, Brunski JB, Hurley E. Effects of fabrication, finishing and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional "gold" and plastic cylinders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11: 589-598.
21. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:28-35.
22. Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, et al. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:137-141.
23. Misch CE. Screw-retained versus cement-retained implant-supported prostheses. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1995;7:15-18.
24. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:719-728.
25. Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, et al. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:239-246.
26. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, et al. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro-study of 3-unit implant supported FPDs. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2004;15:466-473.
27. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, et al. In vitro study on passive fit in implant supported five-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:30-37.
28. Johansson LA, Ekfeldt A. Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:172-176.
29. Napankangas R, Salonen-Kemppi MA, Raustia AM. Longevity of fixed metal ceramic bridge prostheses: a clinical follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:140-145.
30. Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 2. Modes of failure and influence of various clinical characteristics. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:177-182.
31. Singer A, Serfaty V. Cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a 6-month to 3-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:645-649.
32. Aristidis GA, Dimitra B. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:185-189.
33. Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:299-302.
34. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Approaches for intraoral repair of ceramic restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21:635-639.
35. Brägger U, Aeschlimann S, Burgin W, et al. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2001;12:26-34.
36. Keaveny TM, Guo XE, Wachtel EF, et al. Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. J Biomech. 1994;27:1127-1136.
37. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, et al. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:529-536.
38. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:66-75.