Randomized Evaluation of a Supplemental Grade-Wide Mathematics Intervention

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1251-1284

  VanDerHeyden, Amanda ^a   McLaughlin, Tara ^b   Algina, James ^b   Snyder, Patricia ^b  

^a Education Research and Consulting Inc ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

classwide intervention; mathematics; randomized controlled trial; response to intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869846267     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0002831212462736     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akaike H.A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19:716-723.
2. Binder C.Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm.Behavior Analyst. 1996;19:163-197.
3. Bryant D. P.,Bryant B. R.,Roberts G.,Vaughn S.,Pfannenstiel K. H.,Porterfield J.,Gersten R.Early numeracy intervention programs for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties.Exceptional Children. 2011;78:7-23.
4. Burns M. K.Empirical analysis of drill ratio research: Refining the instructional level for drill tasks.Remedial and Special Education. 2004;25:167-175.
5. Burns M. K.,Codding R. S.,Boice C. H.,Lukito G.Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill by treatment interaction.School Psychology Review. 2010;39:69-83.
6. Burns M. K.,Riley-Tillman T. C.,VanDerHeyden A. M.RTI applications: Academic and behavioral interventions. New York, NY: Guilford; 2012:.
7. Burns M. K.,VanDerHeyden A. M.,Jiban C.Assessing the instructional level for mathematics: A comparison of methods.School Psychology Review. 2006;35:401-418.
8. Codding R. S.,Chan-Iannetta L.,Palmer M.,Lukito G.Examining a classwide application of cover-copy-compare with and without goal setting to enhance mathematics fluency.School Psychology Quarterly. 2009;24:173-185.
9. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf.
10. Daly E. J.,Martens B. K.A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1994;27:459-469.
11. Daly E. J.,Martens B. K.,Kilmer A.,Massie D.The effects of instructional match and content overlap on generalized reading performance.Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis. 1996;29:507-518.
12. Deno S. L.,Mirkin P. K.Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exception Children; 1977:.
13. Enders C. K.,Tofighi D.Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue.Psychological Methods. 2007;12:121-138.
14. Foegen A.,Jiban C.,Deno S.Progress monitoring in mathematics: A review of the literature.The Journal of Special Education. 2007;41:121-139.
15. Fuchs D.,Fuchs L. S.,Mathes P. G.,Simmons D. C.Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity.American Educational Research Journal. 1997;34:174-206.
16. Fuchs L. S.,Fuchs D.,Powell S. R.,Seethaler P. M.,Cirino P. T.,Fletcher J. M.Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice.Learning Disability Quarterly. 2008;31:79-92.
17. Gersten R.,Fuchs L. S.,Comptom D.,Coyne M.,Greenwood C.,Innocenti M. S.Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education.Exceptional Children. 2005;71:149-164.
18. Greenwood C. R.Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students.Exceptional Children. 1991;57:521-535.
19. Stanford achievement test (9th ed.) spring norms book. San Antonio, TX: Author; 1997:.
20. Haring N. G.,Lovitt T. C.,Eaton M. D.,Hansen C. L.The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co; 1978:.
21. Harniss M. K.,Stein M.,Carnine D.Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches. Shinn M. R.Walker H. M.Stoner G., ed. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists; 2002:571-587.
22. Hattie J.Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009:.
23. Ikeda M. J.,Neesen E.,Witt J. C.Best practices in school psychology. Thomas A.Grimes J., ed. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists; 2008:103-114.
24. Johnson K. R.,Layng T. V. J.Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency.American Psychologist. 1992;47:1475-1490.
25. Lauen D. L.,Gaddis S. M.Shining a light or fumbling in the dark? The effects of NCLB's subgroup-specific accountability on student achievement.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2012;34:185-208.
26. Ma L.Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999:.
27. Math connects. Columbus, OH: The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2009:.
28. Mayfield K. H.,Chase P. N.The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2002;35:105-123.
29. McIntyre L. L.,Gresham F. M.,DiGennaro F. D.,Reed D. D.Treatment integrity of school-based interventions with children in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1991-2005.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2007;40:659-672.
30. Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001:.
31. Noell G. H.,Gansle K. A.Assuring the form has substance: Treatment plan implementation as the foundation of assessing response to intervention.Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2006;32:32-39.
32. Noell G. H.,Witt J. C.,Slider N. J.,Connell J. E.,Gatti S. L.,Williams K. L.,. . Duhon G. J.Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies.School Psychology Review. 2005;34:87-106.
33. O'Connor R. E.,Fulmer D.,Harty K.,Bell K.Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: Changes in teaching and child outcomes.Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005;38:440-455.
34. O'Donnell C. L.Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research.Review of Educational Research. 2008;78:33-84.
35. Pearson. (2010). Technical update for 2009-2010 test administration.
36. Raudenbush S. W.,Bryk A. S.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:.
37. Rivken S. G.,Hanushek E. A.,Kain J. F.Teachers, schools, and academic achievement.Econometrica. 2005;73:417-458.
38. Sanetti L. M. H.,Kratochwill T. R.Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series.School Psychology Review. 2009;38:445-459.
39. Schoolhouse Technologies Inc. (2003). Mathematics Worksheet Factory Deluxe (Version 3.0). Retrieved from http://www.shcoolhousetechnologies.com.
40. Shapiro E. S.,Clemens N. H.A conceptual model for evaluating system effects of response to intervention.Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2009;35:3-16.
41. Slavin R. E.,Lake C.Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis.Review of Educational Research. 2008;78:427-515.
42. VanDerHeyden A. M.,Burns M. K.Examination of the utility of various measures of mathematics proficiency.Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2008;33:215-224.
43. VanDerHeyden A. M.,Witt J. C.,Gilbertson D. A.Multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education.Journal of School Psychology. 2007;45:225-256.
44. Witt J. C.,Martens B. K.Assessing the acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms.Psychology in the Schools. 1983;20:510-517.
45. Witt J. C.,Noell G. H.,LaFleur L. H.,Mortenson B. P.Teacher use of interventions in general education settings: Measurement and analysis of the independent variable.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1997;30:693-696.
46. Yeh S. S.The cost effectiveness of five policies for improving student achievement.Journal of Evaluation. 2007;28:416-436.