Cheminformatics

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 55, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 65-75

  Wegner, Joerg Kurt ^a   Sterling, Aaron ^b   Guha, Rajarshi ^c   Bender, Andreas ^d   Faulon, Jean Loup ^e   Hastings, Janna ^f   O'Boyle, Noel ^g   Overington, John ^f   Van Vlijmen, Herman ^a,h   Willighagen, Egon ⁱ  

^a JANSSEN RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Belgium)

^b Iowa State University   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITÉ D EVRY VAL D ESSONNE   (France)

^f EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^h LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

ⁱ MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION; CHEMICAL INFORMATION; CHEMINFORMATICS; LIFE-SCIENCES; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH; NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINES; OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARES; PUBLIC DATA; SMALL MOLECULES;

BIOINFORMATICS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 84869446744     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2366316.2366334     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Albuquerque, M., Hopfinger, A., Barreiro, E., and De Alencastro, R. Four-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of a series of interphenylene 7-oxabicycloheptane oxazole thromboxane a2 receptor antagonists. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 38, 5(Oct. 1998), 925-938.
2. Barnard, J. A comparison of different approaches to Markush structure handling. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 31, 1(Feb. 1991), 64-68.
3. Blum, L. C. and Reymond, J.-L. 970 million druglike small molecules for virtual screening in the chemical universe database GDB-13. Journal of the American Chemical Society 131, 25(July 2009), 8732-8733.
4. Bohacek, R., McMartin, C., and Guida, W. The art and practice of structure-based drug design: A molecularmodeling perspective. Medicinal Research Reviews 16, 1(Jan. 1996), 3-50.
5. Breiman, L. Statistical modeling: The two cultures. Statistical Science 16, 3(Aug. 2001), 199-215.
6. Brown, N. Chemoinformatics-An introduction for computer scientists. ACM Computing Surveys 41, 2(Feb. 2009), 1-38.
7. Chen, B. and Wild, D. J. PubChem BioAssays as a data source for predictive models. Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling 28, 5(Jan. 2010), 420-426.
8. Cordella, L., Foggia, P., Sansone, C., and Vento, M. An improved algorithm for matching large graphs. In Proceedings of the Third IAPR-TC15 Workshop on Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition (Ischia, Italy, 2001), 149-159.
9. De Matos, P., Alcantara, R., Dekker, A., Ennis, M. et al. Chemical entities of biological interest: An update. Nucleic Acids Research 38(Jan. 2010), D249-D254.
10. Faulon, J.-L. and Bender, A. Handbook of Cheminformatics Algorithms. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2010.
11. Ferreira, J. and Couto, F. Semantic similarity for automatic classification of chemical compounds. PLoS Computational Biology 6, 9(Sept. 2010), e1000937.
12. Free, S. and Wilson, J. A mathematical contribution to structure activity studies. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 7(July 1964), 395-399.
13. Goldberg, L. and Jerrum, M. Randomly sampling molecules. SIAM Journal on Computing 29, 3(Dec. 1999), 834-853.
14. Hansch, C., Maloney, P., Fujita, T., and Muir, R. Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients. Nature 194(Apr. 1962), 178-180.
15. Jessop, D. M., Adams, S. E., Willighagen, E. L., Hawizy, L., and Murray-Rust, P. OSCAR4: A flexible architecture for chemical text mining. Journal of Cheminformatics 3, 1(Oct. 2011), 41-53.
16. Johnson, M. and Maggiora, G. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990.
17. Kind, T. and Fiehn, O. Advances in structure elucidation of small molecules using mass spectrometry. Bioanalytical Reviews 2, 1-4(Dec. 2010), 23-60.
18. King, A. Waving goodbye to the paper lab book. Chemistry World 8, 11(Nov. 2011), 46-49.
19. Kuhn, M., Campillos, M., Letunic, I., Jensen, L. J. J., and Bork, P. A side-effect resource to capture phenotypic effects of drugs. Molecular Systems Biology 6 (Jan. 2010).
20. Lapinsh, M. Development of proteo-chemometrics: a novel technology for the analysis of drug-receptor interactions. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1525, 1-2(Feb. 2001), 180-190.
21. Lindsay, R., Buchanan, B., Feigenbaum, E., and Lederberg, J. DENDRAL: A case study of the first expert system for scientific hypothesis formation. Artificial Intelligence 61, 2(June 1993), 209-261.
22. Masek, B. B., Shen, L., Smith, K. M., and Pearlman, R. S. Sharing chemical information without sharing chemical structure. Journal of Chemical Information Modelling 48, 2(Feb. 2008), 256-261.
23. Morgan, H. L. The generation of a unique machine description for chemical structures: A technique developed at Chemical Abstracts Service. Journal of Chemical Documentation 5, 2(May 1965), 107-113.
24. O'Boyle, N. M., Banck, M., James, C. A., Morley, C., Vandermeersch, T., and Hutchison, G. R. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. Journal of Cheminformatics 3, 33(Oct. 2011), 33-47.
25. O'Boyle, N. M., Guha, R., Willighagen, E. L., Adams, S. E. et al. Open data, open source and open standards in chemistry: The Blue Obelisk five years on. Journal of Cheminformatics 3, 1(Oct. 2011), 37-53.
26. Oprea, T. I., Tropsha, A., Faulon, J.-L., and Rintoul, M. D. Systems chemical biology. Nature Chemical Biology 3, 8(Aug. 2007), 447-450.
27. Rijnbeek, M. and Steinbeck, C. An open source chemistry search engine for Oracle. Journal of Cheminformatics 1, 17 (Oct. 2009).
28. Rubacha, M., Rattan, A. K., and Hosselet, S. C. A review of electronic laboratory notebooks available in the market today. Journal of Laboratory Automation 16, 1(Feb. 2011), 90-98.
29. Sayle, R. Foreign-language translation of chemical nomenclature by computer. Journal of Chemical Information and Modelling 49, 3(Mar. 2009), 519-530.
30. Schneider, G. and Fechner, U. Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 4, 8(Aug. 2005), 649-663.
31. Spjuth, O., Alvarsson, J., Berg, A., Eklund, M. et al. Bioclipse 2: A scriptable integration platform for the life sciences. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 397 (Dec. 2009).
32. Stein, S., Heller, S., and Tchekhovskoi, D. An open standard for chemical structure representation: The IUPAC chemical identifier. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Chemical Information Conference (Nîmes, France, Oct.). Infonortics, Malmesbury, England, 2003, 131-143.
33. Steinbeck, C., Han, Y., Kuhn, S., Horlacher, O. et al. The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): An open-source Java library for chemo-and bioinformatics. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 43, 2(Mar. 2003), 493-500.
34. Swamidass, S. J. and Baldi, P. Bounds and algorithms for fast exact searches of chemical fingerprints in linear and sublinear time. Journal of Chemical Information and Modelling 47, 2(Feb. 2007), 302-317.
35. Taylor, K. T. The status of electronic laboratory notebooks for chemistry and biology. Current Opinion in Drug Discovery and Development 9, 3(May 2006), 348-353.
36. Todeschini, R. and Consonni, V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors, Volume 11 of Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry. Wiley-VCH, New York, 2000.
37. Van Der Horst, E., Okuno, Y., Bender, A., and Ijzerman, A. Substructure mining of GPCR ligands reveals activity-class specific functional groups in an unbiased manner. Journal of Chemical Information and Modelling 49, 2(Feb. 2009), 348-360.
38. Warr, W. Representation of chemical structures. Interdisciplinary Reviews of Computational Molecular Science 1, 4(Mar. 2011), 557-579.
39. Weininger, D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. Journal of Chemical Information and Modelling 28, 1(Feb. 1988), 31-36.
40. Weininger, D. Fingerprints: Screening and similarity; http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.finger.html