Substructure mining of GPCR ligands reveals activity-class specific functional groups in an unbiased manner

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 348-360

  Van Der Horst, Eelke ^a   Okuno, Yasushi ^b   Bender, Andreas ^a   IJzerman, Adriaan P ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; CHEMISTRY;

AROMATIC SYSTEM; BINDING RECEPTORS; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTORS; HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS; SEROTONIN RECEPTORS; SIX-MEMBERED RINGS; SPECIFIC FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; STRUCTURAL FEATURE;

LIGANDS;

G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; LIGAND;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

LIGANDS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED;

EID: 65249169368     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci8003896     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bemis, G. W.; Murcko, M. A. The Properties of Known Drugs. 1. Molecular Frameworks. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39 (15), 2887-2893.
2. Bemis, G. W.; Murcko, M. A. Properties of Known Drugs. 2. Side Chains. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42 (25), 5095-5099.
3. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Distribution of Molecular Scaffolds and R-Groups Isolated from Large Compound Databases. J. Mol. Model. 1999, 5 (5), 97-102.
4. Xu, J. A New Approach to Finding Natural Chemical Structure Classes. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45 (24), 5311-5320.
5. Nilakantan, R.; Nunn, D. S.; Greenblatt, L.; Walker, G.; Haraki, K.; Mobilio, D. A Family of Ring System-Based Structural Fragments for Use in Structure-Activity Studies: Database Mining and Recursive Partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (3), 1069-1077.
6. Vinkers, H. M.; de Jonge, M. R.; Daeyaert, F. F. D.; Heeres, J.; Koymans, L. M. H.; van Lenthe, J. H.; Lewi, P. J.; Timmerman, H.; Van Aken, K.; Janssen, P. A. J. SYNOPSIS: SYNthesize and Optimize System in Silico. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46 (13), 2765-2773.
7. Todd, M. H. Computer-aided organic synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34 (3), 247-66.
8. Bender, A.; Mussa, H. Y.; Glen, R. C.; Reiling, S. Similarity Searching of Chemical Databases Using Atom Environment Descriptors (MOL-PRINT 2D): Evaluation of Performance. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (5), 1708-1718.
9. Bender, A.; Mussa, H. Y.; Glen, R. C.; Reiling, S. Molecular Similarity Searching Using Atom Environments, Information-Based Feature Selection, and a Naive Bayesian Classifier. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (1), 170-178.
10. Lameijer, E. W.; Kok, J. N.; Back, T.; IJzerman, A. P. Mining a Chemical Database for Fragment Co-occurrence: Discovery of "Chemical Clichés". J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (2), 553-562.
11. Lipkus, A. H.; Yuan, Q.; Lucas, K. A.; Funk, S. A.; Bartelt, W. F.; Schenck, R. J.; Trippe, A. J. Structural Diversity of Organic Chemistry. A Scaffold Analysis of the CAS Registry. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73 (12), 4443-4451.
12. Aronov, A. M.; Bemis, G. W. A minimalist approach to fragment-based ligand design using common rings and linkers: application to kinase inhibitors. Proteins 2004, 57 (1), 36-50.
13. Bender, A.; Glen, R. C. Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2 (22), 3204-3218.
14. Durant, J. L.; Leland, B. A.; Henry, D. R.; Nourse, J. G. Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42 (6), 1273-1280.
15. Glen, R. C.; Bender, A.; Arnby, C. H.; Carlsson, L.; Boyer, S.; Smith, J. Circular fingerprints: flexible molecular descriptors with applications from physical chemistry to ADME. IDrugs 2006, 9 (3), 199-204.
16. Batista, J.; Godden, J. W.; Bajorath, J. r. Assessment of Molecular Similarity from the Analysis of Randomly Generated Structural Fragment Populations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (5), 1937-1944.
17. Batista, J.; Bajorath, J. Chemical Database Mining through Entropy-Based Molecular Similarity Assessment of Randomly Generated Structural Fragment Populations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47 (1), 59-68.
18. Sheridan, R. P.; Miller, M. D. A Method for Visualizing Recurrent Topological Substructures in Sets of Active Molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 1998, 38 (5), 915-924.
19. Raymond, J. W.; Willett, P. Maximum common subgraph isomorphism algorithms for the matching of chemical structures. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16 (7), 521-533.
20. Scitegic Pipeline Pilot, 6.1.5.0 Student Edition; Accelrys, Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2007.
21. ClassPharmer, 4.5; Simulations Plus, Inc.: Lancaster, CA, 2008.
22. Worlein, M.; Meinl, T.; Fischer, I.; Philippsen, M. A Quantitative Comparison of the Subgraph Miners MoFa, gSpan, FFSM, and Gaston Knowledge Discovery in Databases: PKDD 2005; 2005; pp 392-403.
23. Engkvist, O.; Wrede, P.; Rester, U. Prediction of CNS Activity of Compound Libraries Using Substructure Analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (1), 155-160.
24. Borgelt, C.; Berthold, M. R. Mining Molecular Fragments: Finding Relevant Substructures of Molecules. In Data Mining, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, IEEE Computer Society: pp 51-58.
25. Barratt, M. D.; Rodford, R. A. The computational prediction of toxicity. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5 (4), 383-388.
26. Nijssen, S.; Kok, J. N. A quickstart in frequent structure mining can make a difference. In Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data, Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. Ronny, K., Gehrke, J., DuMouchel, W., Ghosh, J., Eds.; ACM Press: New York, U.S.A.: pp 647-652.
27. Nijssen, S. MULTI GASTON GrAph, Sequences and Tree ExtractiON algorithm, version 0.2; Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2004.
28. Kazius, J.; Nijssen, S.; Kok, J.; Bäck, T.; IJzerman, A. P. Substructure Mining Using Elaborate Chemical Representation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (2), 597-605.
29. Heiko, H.; Christian, B.; Michael, R. B. Large Scale Mining of Molecular Fragments with Wildcards, Procedings of the 5th International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis, IOS Press: pp 495-504.
30. Meinl, T.; Borgelt, C.; Berthold, M. R. Mining Fragments with Fuzzy Chains in Molecular Databases, Proceeding of the 2nd International Workshop on Mining Graphs, Trees and Sequences, Pisa, Italy, pp 49-60.
31. Balakin, K. V.; Tkachenko, S. E.; Lang, S. A.; Okun, I.; Ivashchenko, A. A.; Savchuk, N. P. Property-Based Design of GPCR-Targeted Library. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42 (6), 1332-1342.
32. Schnur, D. M.; Hermsmeier, M. A.; Tebben, A. J. Are Target-Family- Privileged Substructures Truly Privileged. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (6), 2000-2009.
33. Okuno, Y.; Tamon, A.; Yabuuchi, H.; Niijima, S.; Minowa, Y.; Tonomura, K.; Kunimoto, R.; Feng, C. GLIDA: GPCR ligand database for chemical genomics drug discovery database and tools update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (suppl-l), D907-912.
34. hGPCR - lig. http://bioinfo-pharma.u-strasbg.fr:8080/hGPCRLig/in-dex.jsp (accessed March 20, 2007).
35. Wheeler, D. L.; Barrett, T.; Benson, D. A.; Bryant, S. H.; Canese, K.; Chetvernin, V.; Church, D. M.; DiCuccio, M.; Edgar, R.; Federhen, S.; Feolo, M.; Geer, L. Y.; Helmberg, W.; Kapustin, Y.; Khovayko, O.; Landsman, D.; Lipman, D. J.; Madden, T. L.; Maglott, D. R.; Miller, V.; Ostell, J.; Pruitt, K. D.; Schuler, G. D.; Shumway, M.; Sequeira, E.; Sherry, S. T.; Sirotkin, K.; Souvorov, A.; Starchenko, G.; Tatusov, R. L.; Tatusova, T. A.; Wagner, L.; Yaschenko, E. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D13-D21.
36. Roth, B. L.; Lopez, E.; Beischel, S.; Westkaemper, R. B.; Evans, J. M. Screening the receptorome to discover the molecular targets for plant-derived psychoactive compounds: a novel approach for CNS drug discovery. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004, 102 (2), 99-110.
37. DIVERSet; ChemBridge Corp.: San Diego, CA, 2006.
38. IUPHAR RECEPTOR DATABASE. www.iuphar-db.org (accessed May 9, 2007).
39. Foord, S. M.; Bonner, T. I.; Neubig, R. R.; Rosser, E. M.; Pin, J.-P.; Davenport, A. P.; Spedding, M.; Harmar, A. J. International Union of Pharmacology. XLVI. G Protein-Coupled Receptor List. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005, 57 (2), 279-288.
40. Horn, F.; Bettler, E.; Oliveira, L.; Campagne, F.; Cohen, F. E.; Vriend, G. GPCRDB information system for G protein-coupled receptors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (1), 294-297.
41. JChem Standardizes 3.2.11; ChemAxon Kft.: Budapest, Hungary, 2007.
42. Kazius, J.; McGuire, R.; Bursi, R. Derivation and Validation of Toxicophores for Mutagenicity Prediction. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (1), 312-320.
43. ISIS/Draw, 2.5; MDL Information Systems, Inc.: San Leandro, CA, 2002.
44. Strader, C. D.; Sigal, I. S.; Candelore, M. R.; Rands, E.; Hill, W. S.; Dixon, R. A. Conserved aspartic acid residues 79 and 113 of the β-adrenergic receptor have different roles in receptor function. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263 (21), 10267-10271.
45. Lindner, M. D. Clinical attrition due to biased preclinical assessments of potential efficacy. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 115 (1), 148-175.
46. Feher, M.; Schmidt, J. M. Property distributions: differences between drugs, natural products, and molecules from combinatorial chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (1), 218-27.
47. Bondensgaard, K.; Ankersen, M.; Thogersen, H.; Hansen, B. S.; Wulff, B. S.; Bywater, R. P. Recognition of Privileged Structures by G-Protein Coupled Receptors. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (4), 888-899.
48. Klabunde, T.; Evers, A. GPCR Antitarget Modeling: Pharmacophore Models for Biogenic Amine Binding GPCRs to Avoid GPCR-Mediated Side Effects. ChemBioChem 2005, 6 (5), 876-889.
49. Marin, R. M.; Aguirre, N. F.; Daza, E. E. Graph Theoretical Similarity Approach To Compare Molecular Electrostatic Potentials. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48 (1), 109-118.
50. Jacoby, E.; Fauchère, J.-L.; Raimbaud, E.; Ollivier, S.; Michel, A.; Spedding, M. A Three Binding Site Hypothesis for the Interaction of Ligands with Monoamine G Protein-coupled Receptors: Implications for Combinatorial Ligand Design. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1999, 18 (6), 561-572.
51. Klabunde, T.; Hessler, G. Drug Design Strategies for Targeting G-Protein-Coupled Receptors. ChemBioChem 2002, 3 (10), 928-944.
52. Meltzer, H. Y. Treatment-resistant schizophrenia-the role of clozapine. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 1997, 14 (1), 1-20.
53. Bristow, L. J.; Kramer, M. S.; Kulagowski, J.; Patel, S.; Ragan, C. I.; Seabrook, G. R. Schizophrenia and L-745, 870, a novel dopamine D4 receptor antagonist. Trends Pharmacol. Res. 1997, 18 (6), 186-188.
54. van der Horst, E.; IJzerman, A. P. Computational Approaches to Fragment and Substructure Discovery and Evaluation. In Fragment-Based Drug Discovery: a Practical Approach, first edition; Zartler, E. R., Shapiro, M. J., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, West-Sussex, United Kingdom, 2008; pp 199-222.