Developments in quantitative mass spectrometry for the analysis of proteome dynamics

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 668-676

  Hughes, Christopher ^a   Krijgsveld, Jeroen ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR ADAPTATION; CELLULAR PROTEINS; DETAILED MODELS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; LABELING TECHNIQUES; METABOLIC LABELING; PRIMARY RESPONSE; PROTEOMIC APPROACHES;

GENE EXPRESSION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; PROTEINS; RESTORATION;

DYNAMICS;

CARBON 13; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; NITROGEN 15; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN; PROTEOME; RNA;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL CELL; CELL CULTURE; FLUORESCENCE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; ISOTOPE LABELING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLOMICS; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; ORGANISMS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; RNA SEQUENCE; RNA SYNTHESIS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEINS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84869114693     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.09.007     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Vogel C., Marcotte E.M. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:227-232.
2. Bantscheff M., et al. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404:939-965.
3. Rabani M., et al. Metabolic labeling of RNA uncovers principles of RNA production and degradation dynamics in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29:436-442.
4. Wang Z., et al. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:57-63.
5. Ghaemmaghami S., et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 2003, 425:737-741.
6. Huh W.K., et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 2003, 425:686-691.
7. Newman J.R.S., et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 2006, 441:840-846.
8. Belle A., et al. Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:13004-13009.
9. Yen H.C.S., et al. Global protein stability profiling in mammalian cells. Science 2008, 322:918-923.
10. Khmelinskii A., et al. Tandem fluorescent protein timers for in vivo analysis of protein dynamics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:708-714.
11. Yewdell J.W., et al. Out with the old, in with the new? Comparing methods for measuring protein degradation. Cell Biol. Int. 2011, 35:457-462.
12. Snapp E.L. Fluorescent proteins: a cell biologist's user guide. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19:649-655.
13. Yates J.R., et al. Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 11:49-79.
14. Doherty M.K., Beynon R.J. Protein turnover on the scale of the proteome. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2006, 3:97-110.
15. Hinkson I.V., Elias J.E. The dynamic state of protein turnover: it's about time. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:293-303.
16. Ong S.E., et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1:376-386.
17. Bantscheff M., et al. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389:1017-1031.
18. Mann M. Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:952-958.
19. Beynon R.J., Pratt J.M. Metabolic labeling of proteins for proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4:857-872.
20. Pratt J.M., et al. Dynamics of protein turnover, a missing dimension in proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1:579-591.
21. Nagaraj N., et al. Deep proteome and transcriptome mapping of a human cancer cell line. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:548.
22. Geiger T., et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of eleven common cell lines reveals ubiquitous but varying expression of most proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11. M111.014050.
23. Beck M., et al. The quantitative proteome of a human cell line. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:549.
24. Cambridge S.B., et al. Systems-wide proteomic analysis in mammalian cells reveals conserved, functional protein turnover. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10:5275-5284.
25. Schwanhausser B., et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 2011, 473:337-342.
26. Boisvert F.M., et al. A quantitative spatial proteomics analysis of proteome turnover in human cells. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 11. M111.011429.
27. Geiger T., et al. Super-SILAC mix for quantitative proteomics of human tumor tissue. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:383-385.
28. Geiger T., et al. Use of stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture as a spike-in standard in quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6:147-157.
29. Schwanhausser B., et al. Global analysis of cellular protein translation by pulsed SILAC. Proteomics 2009, 9:205-209.
30. Looso M., et al. Spiked-in pulsed in vivo labeling identifies a new member of the CCN family in regenerating newt hearts. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11:4693-4704.
31. Ross P.L., et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3:1154-1169.
32. Dayon L., et al. Relative quantification of proteins in human cerebrospinal fluids by MS/MS using 6-plex isobaric tags. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:2921-2931.
33. Thompson A., et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75:1895-1904.
34. Jayapal K.P., et al. Multitagging proteomic strategy to estimate protein turnover rates in dynamic systems. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9:2087-2097.
35. Dephoure N., Gygi S.P. Hyperplexing: a method for higher-order multiplexed quantitative proteomics provides a map of the dynamic response to rapamycin in yeast. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5:rs2.
36. Christoforou A.L., Lilley K.S. Isobaric tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics: the ups and downs. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404:1029-1037.
37. Evans C., et al. An insight into iTRAQ: where do we stand now?. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404:1011-1027.
38. Bantscheff M., et al. Robust and sensitive iTRAQ quantification on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7:1702-1713.
39. Ow S.Y., et al. iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: 'the good, the bad and the ugly'. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:5347-5355.
40. Christoforou A., Lilley K.S. Taming the isobaric tagging elephant in the room in quantitative proteomics. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:911-913.
41. Ting L., et al. MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative proteomics. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:937-940.
42. Dieterich D.C., et al. Selective identification of newly synthesized proteins in mammalian cells using bioorthogonal noncanonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:9482-9487.
43. Becer C.R., et al. Click chemistry beyond metal-catalyzed cycloaddition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48:4900-4908.
44. Eichelbaum K., et al. Selective enrichment of newly synthesized proteins for quantitative secretome analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:984-990.
45. Gouw J.W., et al. Quantitative proteomics by metabolic labeling of model organisms. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9:11-24.
46. Savas J.N., et al. Extremely long-lived nuclear pore proteins in the rat brain. Science 2012, 335:942.
47. 15N metabolic labeling of mammalian tissue with slow protein turnover. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:2005-2010.
48. Kruger M., et al. SILAC mouse for quantitative proteomics uncovers kindlin-3 as an essential factor for red blood cell function. Cell 2008, 134:353-364.
49. Doherty M.K., et al. Protein turnover in chicken skeletal muscle: understanding protein dynamics on a proteome-wide scale. Br. Poult. Sci. 2004, 45(Suppl. 1):S27-S28.
50. Doherty M.K., et al. Proteome dynamics in complex organisms: using stable isotopes to monitor individual protein turnover rates. Proteomics 2005, 5:522-533.
51. Larance M., et al. Stable-isotope labeling with amino acids in nematodes. Nat. Methods 2012, 8:849-851.
52. Sury M.D., et al. The SILAC fly allows for accurate protein quantification in vivo. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9:2173-2183.
53. Vogel C., et al. Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:400.
54. Ingolia N.T., et al. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 2009, 324:218-223.
55. Brar G.A., et al. High-resolution view of the yeast meiotic program revealed by ribosome profiling. Science 2012, 335:552-557.
56. Ingolia N.T. Genome-wide translational profiling by ribosome footprinting. Methods Enzymol. 2010, 470:119-142.
57. Ingolia N.T., et al. Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes. Cell 2011, 147:789-802.
58. Michel A.M., et al. Observation of dually decoded regions of the human genome using ribosome profiling data. Genome Res. 2012, 22:2219-2229.
59. Yocum A.K., Chinnaiyan A.M. Current affairs in quantitative targeted proteomics: multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry. Brief. Funct. Genomic Proteomic 2009, 8:145-157.
60. Michalski A., et al. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics using Q Exactive, a high-performance benchtop quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10. M111.011015.
61. Gillet L.C., et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11. O111.016717.
62. Wang X.J., et al. Protein identification using customized protein sequence databases derived from RNA-Seq data. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11:1009-1017.
63. Hashimshony T., et al. CEL-Seq: single-cell RNA-Seq by multiplexed linear amplification. Cell Rep. 2012, 2:666-673.
64. Islam S., et al. Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq. Genome Res. 2011, 21:1160-1167.
65. Ramsköld D., et al. Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:777-782.
66. Ahmad Y., et al. Systematic analysis of protein pools, isoforms, and modifications affecting turnover and subcellular localization. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11. M111.013680.
67. Doherty M.K., et al. Turnover of the human proteome: determination of protein intracellular stability by dynamic SILAC. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8:104-112.
68. 15N labeling of two-dimensional gel-separated protein spots. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11. M111.010025.
69. Troetschel C., et al. Protein turnover quantification in a multi-labeling approach - from data calculation to evaluation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11:512-526.
70. Cargile B.J., et al. Synthesis/degradation ratio mass spectrometry for measuring relative dynamic protein turnover. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76:86-97.
71. Maier T., et al. Quantification of mRNA and protein and integration with protein turnover in a bacterium. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:511.
72. Rao P.K., et al. Protein dynamics in iron-starved Mycobacterium tuberculosis revealed by turnover and abundance measurement using hybrid-linear ion trap-Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:8856.
73. Rao P.K., et al. Determination of global protein turnover in stressed mycobacterium cells using hybrid-linear ion trap-Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80:396-406.
74. Helbig A.O., et al. The diversity of protein turnover and abundance under nitrogen-limited steady-state conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biosyst. 2011, 7:3316-3326.
75. Claydon A.J., et al. Heterogeneous turnover of sperm and seminal vesicle proteins in the mouse revealed by dynamic metabolic labeling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11. M111.014993.
76. Price J.C., et al. Analysis of proteome dynamics in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:14508-14513.
77. Zhang Y.Y., et al. Proteome scale turnover analysis in live animals using stable isotope metabolic labeling. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83:1665-1672.