Identification of subpopulations from connectivity matrices

Ecography

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1004-1016

  Jacobi, Martin Nilsson ^a   André, Carl ^b   Döös, Kristofer ^b   Jonsson, Per R ^c  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b GÖTEBORG UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DATA SET; DISPERSAL; DIVERGENCE; GENOTYPE; LARVA; MARINE PARK; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SUBPOPULATION;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA;

INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 84868354775     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07281.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Alberto F. et al. 2011. Isolation by oceanographic distance explains genetic structure for Macrocystis pyrifera in the Santa Barbara Channel. Mol. Ecol. 20: 2543-2554.
2. Allendorf F. and Luikart G. 2007. Conservation and the genetics of populationBlackwell.
3. Barber P. et al. 2002. Sharp genetic breaks among populations of Haptosquilla pulchella (Stomatopoda) indicate limits to larval transport: patterns, causes, and consequences. Mol. Ecol. 11: 659-674.
4. Bode M. et al. 2006. Larval dispersal reveals regional sources and sinks in the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 308: 17-25.
5. Bohonak A. 1999. Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Q. Rev. Biol. 74: 21-45.
6. Cadrin S. et al. 2005. Stock identification methods: applications in fishery scienceElsevier.
7. Caley M. et al. 1996. Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 27: 477-500.
8. Clauset A. et al. 2004. Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E 70: 066111.
9. Clauset A. et al. 2008. Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature 453: 98-101.
10. Coulon A. et al. 2008. Congruent population structure inferred from dispersal behaviour and intensive genetic surveys of the threatened Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens). Mol. Ecol. 17: 1685-1701.
11. Cowen R. K. and Sponaugle S. 2009. Larval dispersal and marine connectivity. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1: 443-466.
12. Cowen R. K. et al. 2006. Scaling of connectivity in marine populations. Science 311: 522-527.
13. Crooks K. and Sanjayan M. 2006. Connectivity conservationCambridge Univ. Press.
14. Deuflhard P. and Weber M. 2005. Robust perron cluster analysis in conformation dynamics. Linear Algebra Appl. 398: 161-184.
15. Döös K. 1995. Inter-ocean exchange of water masses. J. Geophys. Res. 100 C7: 13499-13514.
16. Döscher R. et al. 2002. The development of the regional coupled ocean-atmosphere model RCAO. Boreal Environ. Res. 7: 183-192.
17. Dupanloup I. et al. 2002. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol. Ecol. 11: 2571-2581.
18. Edwards K. et al. 2007. Using 2-dimensional dispersal kernels to identify the dominant influences on larval dispersal on continental shelves. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 352: 77-87.
19. Eriksson O. 1996. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and metapopulations. Oikos 77: 248-258.
20. Fiedler M. 1973. Algebraic connectivity of graphs. Czechoslovak Math. J. 23: 298-305.
21. Florin A. and Höglund J. 2008. Population structure of flounder (Platichthys flesus) in the Baltic Sea: differences among demersal and pelagic spawners. Heredity 101: 27-38.
22. Frazer D. and Bernatchez L. 2001. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol. Ecol. 10: 2741-2752.
23. Gaggiotti O. et al. 2009. Disentangling the effects of evolutionary, demographic, and environmental factors influencing genetic structure of natural populations: Atlantic herring as a case study. Evolution 63: 2939-2951.
24. Galindo H. et al. 2006. Oceanographic-genetic model predicts population structure of Caribbean corals. Curr. Biol. 16: 1622-1626.
25. Gilg M. and Hilbish T. 2003. The geography of marine larval dispersal: coupling genetics with fine-scale physical oceano graphy. Ecology 84: 2989-2998.
26. Girvan M. and Newman M. 2002. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 7821-7826.
27. Goodwin B. J. and Fahrig L. 2002. How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity? Oikos 99: 552-570.
28. Hanski I. 1999. Metapopulation ecologyOxford Univ. Press.
29. Hastings A. 1993. Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: lessons from coupled logistic equations. Ecology 74: 1362-1372.
30. Hauser L. and Carvalho G. 2008. Paradigm shifts in marine fisheries genetics: ugly hypotheses slain by beautiful facts. Fish Fish. 9: 333-362.
31. Hellberg M. 1996. Dependence of gene flow on geographic distance in two solitary corals with different larval dispersal capabilities. Evolution 50: 1167-1175.
32. Hubert L. 1985. Comparing partitions. J. Classif. 2: 193-218.
33. Jeffs A. et al. 1999. The use of energy stores in the puerulus of the spiny lobster Jasus edwardsii across the continental shelf of new zealand. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A 123: 351-357.
34. Johannesson K. and André C. 2006. Life on the margin: genetic isolation and diversity loss in a peripheral marine ecosystem, the Baltic Sea. Mol. Ecol. 15: 2013-2029.
35. Kawecki T. and Ebert D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7: 1225-1241.
36. Kelly R. and Palumbi S. 2010. Genetic structure among 50 species of the northeastern pacific rocky intertidal communityPLoS One 5: e8594.
37. Knutsen H. et al. 2003. Fine-scaled geographic population structuring in a highly mobile marine species: the Atlantic cod. Mol. Ecol. 12: 385-394.
38. Knutsen H. et al. 2009. Bathymetric barriers promoting genetic structure in the deepwater demersal fish tusk (Brosme brosme). Mol. Ecol. 18: 3151-3162.
39. Kool J. et al. 2010. Complex migration and the development of genetic structure in subdivided populations: an example from Caribbean coral reef ecosystems. Ecography 33: 597-606.
40. Kreimer A. et al. 2008. The evolution of modularity in bacterial metabolic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 6976-6981.
41. Leibold M. et al. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7: 601-613.
42. Levin S. 1974. Dispersion and population interactions. Am. Nat. 108: 207-228.
43. Lowe W. and Allendorf F. 2010. What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? Mol. Ecol. 19: 3038-3051.
44. Mäkinen H. et al. 2006. Genetic relationships among marine and freshwater populations of the european three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) revealed by microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 15: 1519-1534.
45. Mayer C. et al. 2009. Patchy population structure in a short- distance migrant: evidence from genetic and demographic data. Mol. Ecol. 18: 2353-2364.
46. Moritz C. 1994. Defining 'evolutionary significant units' for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 373-375.
47. Morrisey M. and de Kerckhove D. 2009. The maintenance of genetic variation due to asymmetric gene flow in dendritic metapopulations. Am. Nat. 174: 875-889.
48. Nathan R. et al. 2002. Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind. Nature 418: 409-413.
49. Newman M. 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103: 8577-8582.
50. Nikula R. et al. 2008. A broad transition zone between an inner Balit hybrid swarm and a pure north sea subspecies of Macoma balthica (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Mol. Ecol. 17: 1505-1522.
51. Nilsson Jacobi M. 2010. A robust spectral method for finding lumpings and meta stable states of non-reversible markov chains. Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal. 37: 296-306.
52. Nilsson Jacobi M. and Görnerup O. 2009. A spectral method for aggregating variables in linear dynamical systems with application to cellular automata renormalization. Adv. Complex Syst. 12: 1-25.
53. Olsson J. et al. 2012. Genetic structure of whitefish (Coregonus maraena) in the Baltic Sea. Eustarine Coastal Shelf Sci. in press.
54. Palsbøll P. et al. 2007. Identification of management units using population genetic data. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 11-16.
55. Palumbi S. 1994. Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25: 547-572.
56. Paris C. B. et al. 2007. Surfing, spinning, or diving from reef to reef: effects on population connectivity. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 347: 285-300.
57. Pella J. and Masuda M. 2006. The gibbs and split-merge sampler for population mixture analysis from genetic data with incomplete baselines. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63: 576-596.
58. Pringle J. M. et al. 2011. Asymmetric dispersal allows an upstream region to control population structure throughout a species' range. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108: 15288-15293.
59. Roberts C. M. 1997. Connectivity and management of Caribbean coral reefs. Science 278: 1454-1457.
60. Rozenfeld A. et al. 2008. Network analysis identifies weak and strong links in a metapopulation system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 18824-18829.
61. Rubenstein R. 1981. Simulation and the Monte Carlo methodWiley.
62. Ryder O. 1986. Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1: 9-10.
63. Sale P. and Kritzer J. 2003. Determining the extent and spatial scale of population connectivity: decapods and coral reef fishes compared. Fish. Res. 65: 153-172.
64. Schaeffer S. 2007. Graph clustering. Comput. Sci. Rev. 1: 27-64.
65. Selkoe K. et al. 2010. Taking the chaos out of genetic patchiness: seascape genetics reveals ecological and oceanographic drivers of genetic patterns in three temperate reef species. Mol. Ecol. 19: 3708-3726.
66. Sherman C. et al. 2008. Is life history a barrier to dispersal? Contrasting patterns of genetic differentiation along an oceanographically complex coast. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 95: 106-116.
67. Tatarenkov A. et al. 2007. Genetic structure in populations of Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyceae) over spatial scales from 10 m to 800 km. J. Phycol. 43: 675-685.
68. Thorson G. 1950. Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philosoph. Soc. 25: 1-45.
69. van Laarhoven P. and Aarts E. 1987. Simulated annealing: theory and applicationsSpringer.
70. Waples R. 1998. Separating the wheat from the chaf: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J. Hered. 89: 438-450.
71. Waples R. and Gaggiotti O. 2006. What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol. Ecol. 15: 1419-1439.
72. Waples R. et al. 2008. Integrating genetic data into management of marine resources: how can we do it better? Fish Fish. 9: 423-449.
73. Wares J. and Pringle J. 2008. Drift by drift: effective population size is limited by advection. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 235.
74. Watson J. et al. 2010. Realized and potential larval connectivity in the southern California Bight. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 401: 31-48.
75. Werner F. E. et al. 2007. Coupled biological and physical models: present capabilities and necessary developments for future studies of population connectivity. Oceanography 20: 54-69.