Early, equivalent ERP masked priming effects for regular and irregular morphology

Brain and Language

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 81-93

  Morris, Joanna ^a   Stockall, Linnaea ^b  

^a HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electroencephalography; Irregular allomorphy; Masked priming; Morpho orthographic decomposition; Morphology; Visual word form

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EPISODIC MEMORY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MASKING; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867992626     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Albright, A. (2002). The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. PhD thesis. Los Angeles: University of California.
2. Albright A., Hayes B. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition 2003, 90:119-161.
3. Anderson S.R. Inflectional morphology. Language typology and syntactic description 1985, Vol. 48:74-85. Cambridge University Press.
4. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Van Rijn H. The CELEX lexical database 1993, CD-ROM, Philadelphia, PA.
5. Badecker W., Allen M. Morphological parsing and the perception of lexical identity: A masked priming study of stem homographs. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 47:125-144.
6. Baker M.C. The polysynthesis parameter 1996, Oxford University Press, New York.
7. Boudelaa S., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition 2001, 81:65-92.
8. Boudelaa S., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: The CV-Skeleton in Arabic. Cognition 2004, 92:271-303.
9. Brown C., Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5:34-44.
10. Butterworth B. Lexical representation. Language production development writing and other language processes 1983, Vol. 2:257-294. Academic Press.
11. Chabot, York, Waugh The late positive component of the evoked waveform: Relationship to word recognition processes. International Journal of Neuroscience 1984, 22(3-4):299-314.
12. Chauncey K., Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An event-related potentials (ERP) investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:183-200.
13. Chomsky N., Halle M. The sound pattern of English 1968, Vol. 26. Harper & Row.
14. Cohen L., Dehaene S., Naccache L., Lehéricy S., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Hénaff M.A., et al. The visual word form area. Brain 2000, 2000:291-307.
15. Crepaldi D., Rastle K., Coltheart M., Nickels L. Fell primes fall but does bell prime ball? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 63:83-99.
16. Devlin J.T., Jamison H.L., Matthews P.M., Gonnerman L.M. Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:14984-14988.
17. Eddy M., Schmid A., Holcomb P.J. Masked repetition priming and event-related brain potentials: A new approach for tracking the time-course of object perception. Psychophysiology 2006, 43:564-568.
18. Feldman L.B., O'Connor P.A., Del Prado Marti{dotless}́n F.M. Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2009, 16:684-691.
19. Feustel T.C., Shiffrin R.M., Salasoo A. Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1983, 112:309-346.
20. Forster K.I., Davis C. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1984, 10:680-698.
21. Frost R., Deutsch A., Forster K.I. Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2000, 26:751-765.
22. Grainger J., Holcomb P.J. Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass 2009, 3:128-156.
23. Greenhouse S., Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 1959, 24:95-112.
24. Groh-Bordin C., Zimmer H.D., Ecker U.K.H. Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection. NeuroImage 2006, 32:1879-1890.
25. Halle M., Marantz A. Some key features of distributed morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 1994, 21:275-288.
26. Hay J. Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?. Linguistics 2001, 39:1041-1070.
27. Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. On the time course of visual word recognition: An event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:1631-1643.
28. Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials. Brain Research 2007, 1180:39-58.
29. Huynh H., Feldt L. Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1970, 65:1582-1589.
30. Jacoby L.L. Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1983, 9:21-38.
31. Kazanina N., Dukova-zheleva G., Geber D., Kharlamov V., Tonciulescu K. Decomposition into multiple morphemes during lexical access: A masked priming study of Russian nouns. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:800-823.
32. Kielar A., Joanisse M.F., Hare M.L. Priming English past tense verbs: Rules or statistics?. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 58:327-346.
33. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 1984, 307:161-163.
34. Kutas M., McCarthy G., Donchin E. Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 1977, 197:792-795.
35. Lau E., Phillips C., Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:920-933.
36. Lavric A., Clapp A., Rastle K. ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2007, 19:866-877.
37. Lehtonen M., Cunillera T., Rodri{dotless}́guez-Fornells A., Hultén A., Tuomainen J., Laine M. Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research 2007, 1148:123-137.
38. Lewis, G., & Marantz, A. (submitted for publication). Tracking the -ic in frantic: Evidence for full decomposition of unique-stem words. Language and Cognitive Processes.
39. Lewis G., Solomyak O., Marantz A. The neural basis of obligatory decomposition of suffixed words. Brain & Language 2011, 118:118-127.
40. Marantz A. Re: Reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 1982, 13:435-482.
41. Marslen-Wilson, W., Hare, M., & Older, L. (1993). Inflectional morphology and phonological regularity in the English mental lexicon. In Proceedings of the 15th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 693-698).
42. Maurer U., Blau V.C., Yoncheva Y.N., McCandliss B.D. Development of visual expertise for reading: Rapid emergence of visual familiarity for an artificial script. Developmental Neuropsychology 2010, 35:404-422.
43. McCandliss B.D., Cohen L., Dehaene S. The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Science 2003, 7:293-299.
44. McCarthy J. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 1981, 12:373-418.
45. Meunier, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2000). Regularity and irregularity in French inflectional morphology. In Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the cognitive science society: August 13-15, 2000. Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (p. 346).
46. Mohanan P.J., Fiorentino R., Poeppel D. Masked repetition priming using magnetoencephalography. Brain and Language 2008, 106:65-71.
47. Morris J., Frank T., Grainger J., Holcomb P.J. Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:506-521.
48. Morris J., Grainger J., Holcomb P.J. An electrophysiological investigation of early effects of masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:1021-1056.
49. Nakamura K., Dehaene S., Jobert A., Le Bihan D., Kouider S. Subliminal convergence of Kanji and Kana words: Further evidence for functional parcellation of the posterior temporal cortex in visual word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:954-968.
50. O'Brien R., Kaiser M. MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin 1985, 97:316-333.
51. Pastizzo M., Feldman L. Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2002, 28:244-249.
52. Petit J.P., Midgley K.J., Holcomb P.J., Grainger J. On the time course of letter perception: A masked priming ERP investigation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 2006, 13:674-681.
53. Pinker S., Prince A. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Connections and symbols 1988, 73-193. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Pinker, J. Mehler (Eds.).
54. Pizzagalli, D., Regard, M., & Lehmann, D. (1999). Rapid emotional face processing in the human right and left brain hemispheres: An ERP study. NeuroReport 10.
55. Rastle K., Davis M., Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L. Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:507-537.
56. Rastle K., Davis M.H. Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 23:942-971.
57. Rastle K., Davis M.H., New B. The broth in my brothers brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004, 11:1090-1098.
58. Royle, P., Drury, J., Bourguignon, N., & Steinhauer, K. (2010). In Morphology and word recognition: An ERP approach. proceedings of the 2010 annual conference of the Canadian linguistic association (pp. 1-13).
59. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition 1986, Vol. 2:216-271. MIT Press. J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart (Eds.).
60. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568.
61. Solomyak O., Marantz A. MEG Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition: A single-trial correlational MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:2042-2057.
62. Sonnenstuhl I., Eisenbeiss S., Clahsen H. Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition 1999, 72:203-236.
63. Stanners R., Neiser J.J., Hernon W., Hall R. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:399-412.
64. Stockall L., Marantz A. A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon 2006, 1:85-123.
65. Taft M. Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 2004, 57:745-765.
66. Taft M., Forster K.I. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1975, 14:638-647.
67. Tarkiainen A., Cornelissen P.L., Salmelin R. Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 2002, 125:1125-1136.
68. Yang C. Knowledge and learning in natural language 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York.
69. Zweig E., Pylkkänen L. A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 2008, 24:412-439.