The implications of R & D management for organisational effectiveness: A literature review

2012 IEEE International Technology Management Conference, ITMC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 202-211

  Marafon, Alysson Diego ^a   Ensslin, Leonardo ^a   Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu De Oliveira ^a   Ensslin, Sandra Rolim ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

performance evaluation; R D management; systemic analysis

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT; LITERATURE REVIEWS; ORGANISATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; STRATEGIC DECISIONS; STRUCTURED PROCESS; SYSTEMIC ANALYSIS;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84867949182     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ITMC.2012.6306380     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (90)

1. Ojanen, V., and O. Vuola, "Coping with the multiple dimensions of R & D performance analysis," International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 33, pp. 279-290, 2006. (Pubitemid 43132371)
2. Adams, R. et al, "Innovation management measurement: A review," International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 8, pp. 21-47, 2006. (Pubitemid 43536603)
3. OECD and Eurostat, Oslo Manual: Guidelines For Collecting And Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd ed. Paris: OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2005.
4. Churcill and Peter, J. P., Marketing - criando valor para os clientes: Editora Saraiva, 2000.
5. Baldwin, J. M., Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, in Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. Encyclopædia Britannica, 2011.
6. Donnelly, G., "A P & L for R & D," CFO Magazine, pp. 44-50, 2000.
7. Wang, C. H. et al, "Mining the R & D innovation performance processes for high-tech firms based on rough set theory," Technovation, Vol. 30, pp. 447-458, 2010.
8. Griffith, T. L., and J. E. Sawyer, "Research Team Design and Management for Centralized R&D," Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 57, pp. 211-224, 2010.
9. 2010, MOST. Available: http://www.most.gov.cn
10. 2010, MCT. Available: www.mct.gov.br
11. OECD, "Statistics - Country statistical profiles: Key tables from OECD," OECD - Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2008.
12. Chiesa, V., "Managing the internationalization of R & D activities," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 43, pp. 7-23, 1996.
13. Rankin, J. et al, "Initial metrics and pilot program results for measuring the performance of the Canadian construction industry," Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 35, pp. 894-907, 2008.
14. Bitman, W. R., and N. Sharif, "A Conceptual Framework for Ranking R & D Projects," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 55, pp. 267-278, 2008.
15. Agresti, W. W., and R. M. Harris, "Practical Profiles for Managing Systems Engineering R&D," Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 56, pp. 341-351, 2009.
16. (2010, 10/30/2010). EARTO. Available: www.earto.org
17. (2010, 10/30/2010). FASTS. Available: www.fasts.org
18. Vuolle, M. et al, "Measuring the intangible aspects of an R & D project," Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 13, pp. 25-33, 2009.
19. García-Valderrama, T. et al, "A balanced scorecard framework for R & D," European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 11, pp. 241-281, 2008.
20. Lacerda, R. T. O. et al, "A Study Case about a Software Project Management Success Metrics," in 33rd Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop, 2009, pp. 45-54.
21. Ensslin, L. et al, "MCDA: A constructivist approach to the management of human resources at a governmental agency," International Transactions in Operational Research, Vol. 7, pp. 79-100, 2000.
22. Della Bruna Jr., E. et al, "Supply chain performance evaluation: a case study in a company of equipment for refrigeration," in 2011 IEEE International Technology Management Conference, San Jose, USA, 2011, pp. 969-978.
23. Lacerda, R. T. O. et al, "A Performance Measurement View Of IT Project Management.," The International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 60, pp. 132-151, 2011.
24. Marafon, A. D. et al, Modelo Multicritério de Apoio ã Decisão Construtivista no Processo de Avaliação de Fornecedores, Revista Produção, In press.
25. Marafon, A. D., Análise bibliométrica na literatura sobre apoio ã decisão na gestão de P & D, Gestão & Produção, In press.
26. Lacerda, R. T. O. et al, "Contribuições À Gestão Estrategica de Organizações quando analisados na visão de seu Desempenho," Gestão. Org, Vol. 2, 2011.
27. Bortoluzzi, S. C. et al, "Avaliação de desempenho multicritério como apoio ã gestão de empresas: aplicação em uma empresa de serviços," Gestão & Produção, Vol. 18, pp. 633-650, 2011.
28. Bortoluzzi, S. C. et al, "A Avaliação de desempenho em redes de pequenas e médias empresas: estado da arte para as delimitações postas pelo pesquisador," R. eletr. estrat. neg., Vol. 4, pp. 202-222, jun./dez. 2011.
29. Vieira, V. A., "As tipologias, variações e características da pesquisa de marketing," Revista FAE, Vol. 5, pp. 61-70, 2002.
30. Gil, A. C, Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
31. Ferreira, N. S., and E. M. P. Yoshida, "Produção Científica sobre psicoterapias breves no Brasil e demais países latino-americanos (1990-2000)," Est. Psicol, Vol. 3, pp. 523-531, 2004.
32. Iudicibus, S., Teoria da Contabilidade. São Paulo: Atlas, 2004.
33. Richardson, R. J., Pesquisa Social: Métodos e Técnicas. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
34. Lakatos, E. M., and M. A. Marconi, Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica, 6th ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2006.
35. Sá-Silva, J. R. et al, "Pesquisa documental: pistas teoricas e metodologicas," Revista Brasileira de História & Ciências Sociais, Vol. 1, 2009.
36. Bremser, W. G., and N. P. Barsky, "Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R & D performance measurement," R & D Management, Vol. 34, pp. 229-238, 2004. (Pubitemid 38782763)
37. Calantone, R. J. et al, "Decomposing product innovativeness and its effects on new product success," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 23, pp. 408-421, 2006. (Pubitemid 44326385)
38. Cedergren, S. et al, "Evaluation of performance in a product development context," Business Horizons, Vol. 53, pp. 359-69, July/August 2010.
39. Chen, M. Y. et al, "Measuring knowledge management performance using a competitive perspective: An empirical study," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, pp. 8449-8459, 2009.
40. Chiesa, V. et al, "Performance measurement in R & D: exploring the interplay between measurement objectives, dimensions of performance and contextual factors," R & D Management, Vol. 39, pp. 488-518, 2009.
41. Cooper, R. et al, "Portfolio management for new product development: Results of an industry practices study," R & D Management, Vol. 31, pp. 361-380, 2001.
42. Cormican, K., and D. O'Sullivan, "Auditing best practice for effective product innovation management," Technovation, Vol. 24, pp. 819-829, 2004.
43. Eilat, H. et al, "R & D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach," Omega-International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 36, pp. 895-912, 2008.
44. Elmquist, M., and P. Le Masson, "The value of a 'failed' R & D project: an emerging evaluation framework for building innovative capabilities," R & D Management, Vol. 39, pp. 136-152, 2009.
45. García-Valderrama, T., and E. Mulero-Mendigorri, "Content validation of a measure of R & D effectiveness," R & D Management, Vol. 35, pp. 311-331, 2005.
46. Hagedoorn, J., and M. Cloodt, "Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?" Research Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 1365-1379, 2003.
47. Hart, S. et al, "Industrial companies' evaluation criteria in new product development gates," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 20, pp. 22-36, 2003.
48. Lin, B. W., and J. S. Chen, "Corporate technology portfolios and R & D performance measures: A study of technology intensive firms," R & D Management, Vol. 35, pp. 157-170, 2005.
49. Mallick, D. N., and R. G. Schroeder, "An integrated framework for measuring product development performance in high technology industries," Production and Operations Management, Vol. 14, pp. 142-158, 2005. (Pubitemid 41471995)
50. Mikkola, J. H., "Portfolio management of R & D projects: Implications for innovation management," Technovation, Vol. 21, pp. 423-435, 2001. (Pubitemid 32404849)
51. Panizzolo, R. et al, "New product development assessment: Towards a normative-contingent audit," Benchmarking, Vol. 17, pp. 173-194, 2010.
52. Pillai, A. S. et al, "Performance measurement of R and D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment," International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 20, pp. 165-177, 2002. (Pubitemid 34039518)
53. L. P. Santiago and T. G. Bifano, "Management of R & D projects under uncertainty: A multidimensional approach to managerial flexibility," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 52, pp. 269-280, 2005. (Pubitemid 40654475)
54. Schmidt, J. B. et al, "Exploring new product development project review practices," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 26, pp. 520-535, 2009.
55. Verma, D., and K. K. Sinha, "Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R & D environments," Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 20, pp. 451-468, 2002. (Pubitemid 34813931)
56. Von Zedtwitz, M. et al, "Organizing global R & D: Challenges and dilemmas," Journal of International Management, Vol. 10, pp. 21-49, 2004.
57. Wang, J. et al, "A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R & D projects," Technovation, Vol. 30, pp. 601-611, 2010.
58. Roy, B., "Decision science or decision-aid science," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 66, pp. 184-203, 1993.
59. Roy, B., and D. Vanderpooten, The European School of MCDA: A Historical Review, LAMSADE, Université Paris-Dauphin, Paris 1995.
60. Roy, B., and D. Vanderpooten, "The European school of MCDA: emergence, basic features and current works," Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1996.
61. Vincke, P., L'Aide Multicritère À La Decision. Bruxelas: Éditions de l'Umversité de Bruxelles, 1989.
62. Griffin, A., and A. L. Page, "An interim report on measuring product development success and failure," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 10, pp. 291-308, 1993.
63. Hultink, E. J., and H. S. J. Robben, "Measuring New Product Success: The Difference that Time Perspective Makes," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 12, pp. 392-405, 1995.
64. Roy, B., "On operational research and decision aid," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 73, pp. 23-26, 1994.
65. Ensslin, L., and M. L. de Campos, "A prática do aprendizado organizacional," Revista Gestão Industrial, Vol. 2, pp. 58-68, 2006.
66. Ensslin, L. et al, "Avahação do Desempenho de Empresas Terceirizadas com o uso da Metodologia Multicritério em Apoio à Decisão - Construtivista," Pesquisa Operacional (Impresso), Vol. 30, Janeiro a Abril de 2010.
67. De Morares, L. et al, "The multicritena analysis for construction of bench markers to support the Clinical Engineering in the Healthcare Technology Management," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 200, pp. 607-615, 2010.
68. Lacerda, R. T. O. et al, "A Performance Measurement Framework in Portfolio Management: A Constructivist Case," Management Decision, Vol. 49, pp. 1-15, 2011.
69. Lacerda, R. T. O. et al, "Uma Anáhse Bibhométnca da Literatura Sobre Estratégia e Avahação De Desempenho," Gestão & Produção, Vol. 19, No. 1, p. 59-78.
70. Ensslin, L. et al, Apoio ã Decisão - Metodologia para Estruturação de Problemas e Avaliação Multicritério de Alternativas. Florianópolis: Insular, 2001.
71. Tasca, J. E. et al, "An approach for selecting a theoretical framework for the evaluation of training programs," Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 34, pp. 631-655, 2010.
72. Hauser, J. R., and F. Zettelmeyer, "Metrics to evaluate RD & E," Research-Technology Management, 1997.
73. Skinner, W., "The productivity paradox," Management Review, Vol. 75, pp. 41-45, 1986.
74. Giffhorn, E. et al, Aperfeiçoamento da Gestão Organizacional por meio da Abordagem Multicritério de Apoio ã Decisão, Revista Gestão Industrial, 2009.
75. Montibeller, G., and V. Belton, "Qualitative operators for reasoning maps: Evaluating multi-criteria options with networks of reasons," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 195, pp. 829-840, 2009.
76. Kaplan, R. S., "Measuring Manufacturing Performance: A New Challenge for Managerial," The Accounting Review, Vol. 58, pp. 686-705, 1983.
77. Vergidis, K. et al, "Business process analysis and optimization: beyond reengmeermg," Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 38, pp. 69-82, 2008.
78. Banker, R. D. et al, "Reporting manufacturing performance measures to workers: An empirical study," Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5, pp. 33-55, 1993.
79. Baines, A., and K. Langfield-Smith, "Antecedents to management accounting change: a structural equation approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 675-698, 2003. (Pubitemid 37170331)
80. Henri, J. F., "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31, pp. 77-103, 2006.
81. Chisnall, P., Analysis and Measurement. McGraw-Hill: Marketing Research, 1973.
82. Keeney, R. L., Value Focused-Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision-making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
83. Barzilai, J., "A New Methodology for Dealing with Conflicting Engineering Design Criteria," Proceeding of the 18th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Management, pp. 73-79, 1997.
84. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton, "The Balanced Scorecard measures that drive performance," Harvard Business Review, 1992.
85. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton, Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes Boston-MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2004.
86. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton, "Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part I," Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15, 2001.
87. Sandoval, C, "Comparing AHP and ANP shiftworks models: Hierarchy simplicity vs. Network connectivity," Fulcrum Engineering, 2004.
88. Lee, W., Decision theory and human behavior. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons, 1971.
89. Ozkaya, A., "R & D Team, Competencies, Innovation, and Growth With Knowledge Information Flow," Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 57, pp. 416-429, 2010.
90. Wolfe, R. A., "Organizational Innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions," Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 31, pp. 405-431, 1994.