A bibliometric analysis of strategy and performance measurement;Uma análise bibliométrica da literatura sobre estratégia e avaliação de desempenho

Gestao e Producao

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 59-78

  De Oliveira Lacerda, Rogério Tadeu ^a   Ensslin, Leonardo ^a   Ensslin, Sandra Rolim ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Decision; Performance measurement; Strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860441450     PISSN: 0104530X     EISSN: 18069649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-530x2012000100005     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. ARAÚJO, C. A. A. Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. Em Questão, v. 12, n. 1, p. 11-32, 2006.
2. BANA e COSTA, C.; ENSSLIN, L. Decision support systems in action: integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 113, p. 315-335, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0377-2217(98)00219-7
3. BARNEY, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, p. 99-120, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 014920639101700108
4. BARNEY, J.; WRIGHT, M.; KETCHEN, D. J. The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, v. 27, p. 625-641, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601 (Pubitemid 33666927)
5. BHAGWAT, R.; SHARMA, M. K. Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, v. 53, p. 43-62, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.04.001 (Pubitemid 47042304)
6. BITITCI, U. S.; SUWIGNJO, P.; CARRIE, A. S. Strategy management through quantitative modelling of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 69, p. 15-22, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0925-5273(99)00113-9 (Pubitemid 32029978)
7. BOURNE, M. et al. Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 20, p. 754-771, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570010330739 (Pubitemid 39032231)
8. CHEN, C. C. An objective-oriented and product-line-based manufacturing performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 112, p. 380-390, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.03.016
9. DE LIMA, E. P.; DA COSTA, S. E. G.; DE FARIA, A. R. Taking operations strategy into practice: developing a process for defining priorities and performance measures. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 122, p. 403-418, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.022
10. DE MORAES, L. et al. The multicriteria analysis for construction of benchmarkers to support the Clinical Engineering in the Healthcare Technology Management. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 200, p. 607-615, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.018
11. EISENHARDT, K. M.; MARTIN, J. A. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, v. 21, p. 1105-1121, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11%3C110 5::AID-SMJ133%3E3.0.CO;2-E
12. ENSSLIN, L. Disciplina de MCDA-C do Programa de Pós Graduação em Engenharia da Produção. UFSC, 2010. Notas de aula.
13. ENSSLIN, L.; DUTRA, A.; ENSSLIN, S. R. MCDA: a constructivist approach to the management of human resources at a governmental agency. International Transactions in Operational Research, v. 7, p. 79-100, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2000.tb00186.x
14. ENSSLIN, L. et al. ProKnow-C, knowledge development process - constructivist. Processo técnico com patente de registro pendente junto ao INPI. 2010a.
15. ENSSLIN, L. et al. Avaliação do desempenho de empresas terceirizadas com o uso da metodologia multicritério de apoio à decisão-construtivista. Revista Pesquisa Operacional, v. 30, 125-152, 2010b.
16. GOOGLE. Google Scholar, 2010.
17. GUNASEKARAN, A.; PATEL, C.; MCGAUGHEY, R. E. A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 87, p. 333-347, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003
18. HAN, K. H.; KANG, J. G.; SONG, M. Two-stage process analysis using the process-based performance measurement framework and business process simulation. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 36, p. 7080-7086, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.035
19. HELFAT, C. E.; PETERAF, M. A. The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, p. 997-1010, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
20. HUANG, S. H.; KESKAR, H. Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 105, p. 510-523, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.04.020 (Pubitemid 44827615)
21. HUDSON, M.; SMART, A.; BOURNE, M. Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 21, p. 1096-1115, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ EUM0000000005587
22. INAMDAR, N.; KAPLAN, R. S. Applying the balanced scorecard in healthcare provider organizations. Journal of Healthcare Management, v. 47, p. 179-195, 2002. PMid:12055900
23. JOHNSTON, R.; PONGATICHAT, P. Managing the tension between performance measurement and strategy: coping strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 28, p. 941-967, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1108/01443570810903104
24. JURAN, J. M. A qualidade desde o projeto. São Paulo: Pioneira, 1997.
25. KARLSSON, C. Researching operations management. London: Routledge, 2008.
26. KENNERLEY, M.; NEELY, A. Measuring performance in a changing business environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 23, n. 213-229, 2003.
27. KETCHEN, D.; BOYD, B.; BERGH, D. Research methodology in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, v. 11, p. 643-658, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094428108319843
28. KRAKOVICS, F. et al. Defining and calibrating performance indicators of a 4PL in the chemical industry in Brazil. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 115, p. 502-514, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05. 016
29. KUNC, M. Using systems thinking to enhance strategy maps. Management Decision, v. 46, p. 761-778, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740810873752
30. KUWAITI, M. E.; KAY, J. M. The role of performance measurement in business process re-engineering. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 20, p. 1411-1426, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 01443570010353086 (Pubitemid 39025952)
31. LACERDA, R. T. O.; ENSSLIN, L.; ENSSLIN, S. R. A Performance measurement framework in portfolio management: a constructivist case. Management Decision, v. 49, p. 1-15. 2011a. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251741111126530
32. LACERDA, R. T. O.; ENSSLIN, L.; ENSSLIN, S. R. A performance measurement view of it project management. The International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 60, p. 132-151, 2011b. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 17410401111101476
33. LEE, A. H. I.; CHEN, W. C.; CHANG, C. J. A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 34, p. 96-107, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022 (Pubitemid 46756241)
34. LIN, C. H.; HSIEH, P. J. A fuzzy decision support system for strategic portfolio management. Decision Support Systems, 38, 383-398, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00118-0
35. LIPE, M. G.; SALTERIO, S. E. The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. Accounting Review, v. 75, p. 283-298, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.3.283
36. LOCH, C. H.; TAPPER, U. A. S. Implementing a strategy- driven performance measurement system for an applied research group. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 19, p. 185-198, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885. 1930185 (Pubitemid 34544632)
37. MAKADOK, R. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, v. 22, p. 387-401, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.158 (Pubitemid 33608233)
38. MARCHAND, M.; RAYMOND, L. Researching performance measurement systems - An information systems perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,v. 28, p. 663-686, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ 01443570810881802
39. MCADAM, R.; BAILIE, B. Business performance measures and alignment impact on strategy - the role of business improvement models. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 22, p. 972-996, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570210440492
40. MELNYK, S. A.; STEWART, D. M.; SWINK, M. Metrics and performance measurement in operations management: dealing with the metrics maze. Journal of Operations Management, v. 22, p. 209-217, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom. 2004.01.004
41. MINTZBERG, H. et al. The strategy process: concepts, contexts, cases. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 2003.
42. MORGAN, G.; SMIRCICH, L. The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review (pre-1986), v. 5, p. 491, 1980.
43. MORGAN, N. A.; VORHIES, D. W.; MASON, C. H. Research notes and commentaries market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 30, p. 909-920, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/smj.764
44. PAPALEXANDRIS, A.; IOANNOU, G.; PRASTACOS, G. P. Implementing the balanced scorecard in greece: a software firm's experience. Long Range Planning, v. 37, p. 351-366, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2004.05.002 (Pubitemid 39259581)
45. PAPKE-SHIELDS, K. E.; MALHOTRA, M. K.; GROVER, V. Strategic manufacturing planning systems and their linkage to planning system success. Decision Sciences, v. 33, p. 1-30, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002. tb01634.x
46. PARETO, V. Cours d'economie politique. Lausanne: F. Rouge, 1986. v.1
47. PODSAKOFF, P. M. et al. The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, v. 26, p. 473-488, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.454 (Pubitemid 40541346)
48. PORTER, M. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press, 1980.
49. QUEZADA, L. E. et al. Method for identifying strategic objectives in strategy maps. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 122, p. 492-500, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.019
50. RODRIGUEZ, R. R.; SAIZ, J. J. A.; BAS, A. O. Quantitative relationships between key performance indicators for supporting decision-making processes. Computers in Industry, v. 60, p. 104-113, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. compind.2008.09.002
51. SARKIS, J. Quantitative models for performance measurement systems - alternate considerations. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 86, p. 81-90, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00055-0
52. SHENHAR, A. J. et al. Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, v. 34, p. 699-725, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0024-6301(01)00097-8 (Pubitemid 34414442)
53. SIMONS, R.; DÁVILA, A.; KAPLAN, R. Performance measurement & control systems for implementing strategy: text & cases. Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Prentice Hall, 2000.
54. SUTTON, R. I.; STAW, B. M. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 40, p. 371-384, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393788 (Pubitemid 126000885)
55. TASCA, J. et al. An approach for selecting a theoretical framework for the evaluation of training programs. Journal of European Industrial Training, v. 34, p. 631-655, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090591011070761
56. TEECE, D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, v. 28, p. 1319-1350, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 (Pubitemid 350134181)
57. THE THOMSON CORPORATION. EndNote X. 2. ed. The Thomson Corporation, 2008.
58. TRANFIELD, D.; DENYER, D.; SMART, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, v. 14, p. 207-222, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467- 8551.00375 (Pubitemid 37256361)
59. TRIVIÑOS, A. N. S. Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais: a pesquisa qualitativa em educação: o positivismo, a fenomenologia, o marxismo. São Paulo: Atlas, 1987.
60. WADE, M.; HULLAND, J. Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. Mis Quarterly, v. 28, p. 107-142, 2004.
61. WINTER, S. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, v. 24, p. 991-995, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
62. YANG, C. L.; CHUANG, S. P.; HUANG, R. H. Manufacturing evaluation system based on AHP/ANP approach for wafer fabricating industry. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 36, p. 11369-11377, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa. 2009.03.023
63. YUAN, F. C.; CHIU, C. A hierarchical design of case-based reasoning in the balanced scorecard application. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 36, p. 333-342, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.032
64. YUKSEL, I.; DAGDEVIREN, M. Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): a case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 37, p. 1270-1278, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.eswa.2009.06.002
65. ZAHRA, S.; SAPIENZA, H.; DAVIDSSON, P. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, v. 43, p. 917-955, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006. 00616.x (Pubitemid 43830049)
66. ZOLLO, M.; WINTER, S. G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, v. 13, p. 339-351, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780