The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 22-38

  Roy, Bernard ^a   Vanderpooten, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

Historical review; Multiple criteria decision aid; School of thought

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003065507     PISSN: 10579214     EISSN: 10991360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199603)5:1<22::AID-MCDA93>3.0.CO;2-F     Document Type: Article

References (155)

1. Abgueguen, R., La Sélection des Supports de Presse, Paris:Robert Lafont, 1971.
2. Achiakh, K., ‘Aide à la décision en avenir risqué fondée sur le modèle de l’utilité espérée, critiques et perspectives’, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine, 1993.
3. Ackoff, R. L., ‘Optimization + objectivity = opt out’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1, 1-7(1977).
4. Agard, J. (ed.), Rationalisation des Choix Budgétaires, Paris:Dunod, 1970.
5. Arrow, K. J., and Raynaud, H., Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1986.
6. d’Avignon, G., and Vincke, Ph., ‘An outranking method under certainty’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 36, 311-321(1988).
7. Bana e Costa, C. A. (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Berlin:Springer, 1990a.
8. Bana e Costa, C. A., ‘Une méthode pour l’aide à la décision en situations multicritères et multiacteurs’, Sist. Urbani, 3, 301-332(1990b).
9. Bana e Costa, C. A., ‘Convictions et aide à la décision’, Newslett. Eur. Working Group Multicriteria Aid for Decisions’, 2(3), 1-3(1993).
10. Bana e Costa, C. A., ‘Les problématique de l’aide à la décision: vers l’enrichissement de la trilogie choix-trirangement’, RAIRO Rech. Opér, in press(1995).
11. Bana e Costa, C. A., and Vansnick, J. C., ‘MACBETH-an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions’, Int. Trans. Oper. Res., 1, 489-500(1994).
12. Bana e Costa, C. A., and Vansnick, J. C., ‘Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model’, J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal., in press(1996).
13. Banville, C., Landry, M., Martel, J. M., and Boulaire, C., ‘A stakeholder’s approach to MCDA’, Working Paper CRAEDO 93-79, Québec: Université Laval, 1993.
14. Benayoun, R., and Boulier, C., Approaches Rationnelles dans la Gestion du Personnel-Réflexions et Expériences, Paris:Dunod, 1993.
15. Benayoun, R., de Montgolfier, J., Tergny, J., and Larichev, O., ‘Linear programming with multiple objective functions: STEP method (STEM)', Math. Program., 1, 366-375(1971).
16. Benayoun, R., de Montgolfier, J., Tergny, J., and Larichev, O., ‘Programmation linéaire avec fonctions économiques multiples: Méthode STEM’, SEMA (Metra Internationa), Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail 188, 1973.
17. Benayoun, R., Roy, B., and Sussmann, B., ‘ELECTRE: une méthode pour guider le choix en présence de points de vue multiples’, SEMA (Metra International), Direction Scientifique, Notre de Travail 49, 1966.
18. Benayoun, R., and Tergny, J., ‘Critéres multiples en programmation mathématique: une solution dans le cas linéaire’, RIRO, V-2, 31-56(1969).
19. Benayoun, R., Tergny, J., and Keuneman, D., ‘Mathematical programming with multi-objective functions: a solution by POP (progressive orientation procedure)', Rev. METRA, IX, 279-299(1970).
20. Bernard, G., and Besson, M. L., ‘Douze méthodes d’analyse multicritère’.RIRO, V-3, 19-64(1971).
21. Bertier, P., and de Montgolfier, J., ‘Comment choisir en tenant compte de points de vue non commensurables’, Anal. Prévis., XI, 521-548(1971).
22. Bétolaud, Y., and Février, R., ‘Conservation des forts surburbaines et passage des autoroutes’, Rev. Forest. Fr., 197-200(1973).
23. Bouyssou, D., ‘Modelling inaccurate determination, uncertainty, imprecision using multiple criteria’, in Lockett, A. G. and Islei, G. (eds), Improving Decision Making in Organisations, Berlin:Springer, 1989, pp. 78-87.
24. Bouyssou, D., ‘Building criteria: a prerequisite for MCDA’, in Bana e Costa, C. A. (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Berlin:Springer, 1990, pp. 58-80.
25. Bouyssou, D., ‘A note on the sum of differences choice function for fuzzy preference relations’, Fuzzy Sets Sys., 47, 197-202(1992a).
26. Bouyssou, D., ‘Ranking methods based on valued preference relations: a characterization of the net flow network’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 60, 61-67(1992b).
27. Bouyssou, D., and Perny, P., ‘Ranking method for valued preference relations: a characterization of a method based on leaving and entering flows’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 61, 186-194(1992).
28. Bouyssou, D., Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A., and Vincke, Ph., ‘A “manifesto” for the new MCDA era’, J. Multi Crit. Decis. Anal., 2, 125-127(1993).
29. Bouyssou, D., and Roy, B., ‘La notion de seuils de discrimination en analyse multicritère’, INFOR, 25, 302-313(1987).
30. Bouyssou, D., and Vincke, Ph., ‘Ranking alternatives on the basis of preference relations: a progress report with special emphasis on outranking relations’, J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal., in press(1996).
31. Brans, J. P., Mareschal, B., and Vincke, Ph., ‘PROMOTHEE: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis’, in Brans, J. P. (ed.), Operational Research '84, Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1984, pp. 408-421.
32. Brans, J. P., and Vincke, Ph., ‘A preference ranking organization method’, Manag. Sci., 31, 647-656(1985).
33. Brans, J. P., Vincke, Ph., and Mareschal, B., ‘How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24, 228-238(1986).
34. Buffet, P., Grémy, J. P., Marc, M., and Sussmann, B., ‘Peut-on choisir en tenant compte de critères multiples? Une methode (ELECTRE) et trois applications’, Rev. METRA, VI, 283-316(1967).
35. Camier, L. L., Martin, M. P., and Raimbault, M., ‘Modèle de décision en présence de critères multiples: choix d’investissement en matière d’équipement hydraulique’, Actes du congrès AFCET Aide à la Décision, 1974, pp. 101-110.
36. Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W., Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, New York:Wiley, 1961.
37. Charpentier, A. R., and Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., ‘La promotion de l’électricité dans l’enterprise et l’utilisation de méthodes multicritères’, in Thiriez, H. and Zionts, S. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin:Springer, 1976, pp. 364-377.
38. Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L., and Arnoff, E. L., Introduction to Operations Research, New York:Wiley, 1957.
39. Climaco, J. N., and Antunes, C. H., ‘Implementation of an user friendly software package-a guided tour of TRIMAP’, Math. Comput. Model., 12, 1299-1309, 1989.
40. Climaco, J. N., and Antunes, C. H., ‘A comparison of microcomputer implemented interactive MOLP methods based on a case study’, in Bana e Costa, C. A. (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Berlin:Springer, 1990, pp. 445-470.
41. Debord, B., ‘Axiomisation de procédures d’agrégation de préférences’, Ph.D Thesis, Université Scientifique, Technologique et Médicale de Grenoble, 1984.
42. Doignon, J. P., Monjardet, B., Roubens, M., and Vincke, Ph., ‘Biorder families, valued relations and preference modelling’, J. Math. Psychol., 30, 435-480(1988).
43. Dubois, D., and Prade, H., Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications, New York:Academic, 1980.
44. Dubois, D., and Prade, H., Théorie des possibilités: Applications à la Représentation des Connaissances en informatique, Paris:Masson, 1985.
45. Fishburn, P. C., Utility theory for Decision-Making, New York, Wiley, 1970.
46. Fodor, J., and Roubens, M., Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, Dordrecht:Kluwer, 1994.
47. Godard, X., ‘Méthodologie de l’analyse multicritère appliquée au transport urbain’, Res. Rep. 9, Institut de Recherche des Transports, 1973.
48. Grassin, N., ‘Constructing “population” criteria for the comparison of different options for a high voltage line route’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 26, 42-57(1986).
49. Guigou, J. L., ‘On French location models’, Reg. Urban Econ., 1, 289-316(1971).
50. Guigou, J. L., Analyse des Données et Choix à Critères Multiples, Paris:Dunod, 1974.
51. Henggeler, C., Alves, M. J., Silva, J. L., and Climaco, J., ‘An integrated MOLP method base package-a guided tour of TOMMIX’, Comput. Oper. Res., 19, 609-625(1992).
52. Holl, J. C., Plas, J. P., and Riou, P., Le choix d’investissement dans l’entreprise, Presses Universitaires de France, 1973.
53. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., ‘Le problème de l’agrégation des préférences: une classe de procédures à seuil’, Math. Sci. Humaines, 43, 29-37(1973).
54. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., ‘How we can use the notion of semi-orders to build outranking relations in multicriteria decision making’, in Wendt, E. and Vlek, C. (eds), Utility, Subjective Probability and Human Decision Making, Dordrecht:Reidel, 1975, pp. 87-112.
55. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., ‘Interactive assessment of preferences using holistic judgements: the PREFCALC system’, in Bana e Costa, C. A. (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Berlin:Springer, 1990, pp. 336-350.
56. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Meziani, R., and Slowinski, R., ‘MOLP with an interactive assessment of a piecewise linear utility function’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 31, 350-357(1987).
57. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., and Shakun, M. F., ‘Decision support systems for semi-structured buying decision’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 16, 48-58(1984).
58. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., and Siskos, J., ‘Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decisionmaking: the UTA method’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 10, 151-164(1982).
59. Jaffray, J. Y., ‘Some experimental findings on decision making under risk and their implications’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 38, 301-306(1989).
60. Jaffray, J. Y., and Cohen, M., ‘Experimental results on decision making under uncertainty’, Methods Oper. Res., 44, 276-289(1982).
61. Jaszkiewicz, A., and Slowinski, R., ‘The light beam search over a non-dominated surface of a multipleobjective programming problem’, in Tzeng, G. H., Wang, H. F., Wen, U. P. and Yu, P. L. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, New York:Springer, 1994, pp. 87-99.
62. Jaszkiewicz, A., and Slowinski, R., ‘Outranking-based interactive exploration of a set of alternatives’, J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal., in press(1996).
63. Kaufmann, A., Méthodes et Modèles de la Recherche Opérationelle, Tome 1, Paris:Dunod, 1972.
64. Kiss, L. N., Martel, J. M., and Nadeau, R., ‘ELECCALC-an interactive software for modelling the decision maker’s preferences’, Decis. Support Syst., 12, 311-326(1994).
65. Korhonen, P., and Laakso, J., ‘A visual interactive method for solving the multiple criteria problem’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24, 277-287(1986).
66. Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H., and Wallenius, J., ‘Choice behavior in interactive multiple criteria decision making’, Ann. Oper. Res., 23, 161-179(1990).
67. Korhonen, P., and Wallenius, J., ‘A Pareto race’, Naval Res. Logist., 35, 615-623(1988).
68. Laffy, R., ‘La méthode MARSAN pour la recherche de produits nouveaux’, presented atESOMAR Congr., Copenhagen, September1966.
69. Landry, M., Malouin, J. L., and Oral, M., ‘Model validation in operations research’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 14, 207-220(1983).
70. Larichev, O. I., ‘Cognitive validity in design of decisionaiding techniques’, J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal., 1, 127-138(1992).
71. Le Boulanger, H., and Roy, B., ‘L’entreprise face à la sélection et à l’orientation des projets de recherche: la méthodologie en usage dans le groupe SEMA’, Rev. METRA, VII, 641-669(1968).
72. Leclercq, J. P., ‘Propositions d’extension de la notion de dominance en présence de relations d’ordre sur les pseudo-critères: MELCHIOR’, Rev. Belge Rech. Opér. Stat. Info., 24, 32-46(1984).
73. Lévine, P., and Pomerol, J. Ch., ‘PRIAM, an interactive program for choosing among multiple attribute alternatives’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 25, 272-280(1986).
74. Lootsma, F. A., ‘Modélisation du jugement humain dans l’analyse multicritère au moyen de comparaisons par paires’, RAIRO Rech. Opér., 21, 241-257(1986).
75. Lootsma, F. A., ‘Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART’, J. Multi-Crit. Dec. Anal., 2, 87-110(1993).
76. Martel, J. M., D’Avignon, G. R., and Couillard, J., ‘A fuzzy outranking relation in multicriteria decision making’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 25, 258-271(1986).
77. Martel, J. M., and Zaras, K., ‘Stochastic dominance in multicriterion analysis under risk’, Theory Dec., 39, 31-49(1995).
78. Massaglia, R., and Ostanello, A., ‘N-TOMIC: a support system for multicriteria segmentation problems’, in Korhonen, P., Lewandowski, A. and Wallenius, J. (eds), Multicriteria Decision Support, Berlin:Springer, 1991, pp. 167-174.
79. Matarazzo, B., ‘Preference ranking global frequencies in multicriterion analysis (PRAGMA)', Eur. J. Oper. Res., 36, 36-49(1988).
80. Matarazzo, B., ‘MAPPAC as a compromise between outranking methods and MAUT’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 54, 48-65(1991).
81. Maystre, L. Y., Pictet, J., and Simos, J., Méthodes Multicritères ELECTRE-Description, Conseils Pratiques et Cas d’Application à la Gestion Environnementale, Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, 1994.
82. Michel, J., ‘La sélection des projets du Programme Architecture Nouvelle’, Actes du Congrès AFCET Aide à al Décision, 1974, pp. 111-121.
83. de Montgolfier, J., and Bertier, P., Approche Multicritère des Problèmes de Décision, Paris:Editions Hommes et Techniques, 1978.
84. Moscarola, J., and Roy, B., ‘Procèdure automatique d’examen de dossiers fondée sur une segmentation trichotomique en présence de critères multiples’, RAIRO Rech. Oper., 11(2), 145-173(1977).
85. Mousseau, V., ‘Problèmes liés à l’évaluation de l’importance en aide multicritère à la décision: réflexions théoriques et expérimenations’, Ph.D Thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine, 1993.
86. Mousseau, V., ‘Eliciting information concerning the relative importance of criteria’, in Pardalos, P. M., Siskos, Y. and Zopounidis, C. (eds), Advances in Multicriteria Analysis, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1995, in press.
87. Munier, B., ‘Complexité et décision stratégique dans l’incertain: que peut-on retenir de la théorie?', in Boiteux, M., de Montbrial, T. and Munier, B. (eds), Marchés, Capital et Incertitude-Essais en l’Honneur de Maurice Allais, Paris:Economica, 1986, pp. 179-197.
88. Norese, M. F., and Ostanello, A., ‘Identification and development of alternatives: introduction to the recognition of process typologies’, in Lockett, A. G. and Islei, G. (eds), Improving Decision Making in Organizations, Berlin:Springer, 1989, pp. 112-123.
89. Oral, M., and Kettani, O., ‘The facets of the modeling and validation process in operations research’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 66, 216-234(1993).
90. Ostanello, A., ‘Action evaluation and action structuring: different decision aid situations reviewed through two actual cases’, in Bana e Costa, C. A. (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Berlin:Springer, 1990, pp. 36-57.
91. Paelinck, J., ‘Qualiflex, a flexible multiple criteria method’, Econ. Lett., 3, 193-197(1978).
92. Pasche, C., ‘EXTRA: An expert system for multicriteria decision making’, European Journal of Operational Research, 52(2), 224-234(1991).
93. Pastign, H., and Leysen, J., ‘Constructing an outranking relation with ORESTE’, Math. Comput. Model., 12, 1255-1268(1989).
94. Pawlak, Z., and Slowinski, R., ‘Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 72, 443-459(1994).
95. Pellegrin, C., ‘Multicriteria decision model and decision making process in an organization: an application in industrial management’, in Munier, B. R. and Machina, M. J. (eds), Models and Experiments in Risk and Rationality, Dordrecht:Kluwer, 1994.
96. Perny, P., ‘Modélisation, agrégation et exploitation des préférences floues dans une problématique de rangement: bases axiomatiques, procédures et logiciels’, Ph.D Thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine, 1992.
97. Perny, P., and Roy, B., ‘The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling’, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 49, 33-53(1992).
98. Pirlot, M., ‘A characterization of “Min” as a procedure for exploiting valued preference relations and related results’, J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal., 4, 37-56(1995).
99. Pirlot, M., ‘A common framework for describing some outranking methods’, J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal., in press(1996).
100. Pomerol, J. Ch., and Barba-Romero, S., Choix Multicritère dans l’Entreprise, Paris, Hermès, 1993.
101. Roba, E., Sussmann, B., and Theys, M., Les Méthodes de Choix Multicritère Appliquées à la Sélection du Personnel-Models of Manpower, The English University Press, 1970.
102. Roubens, M., ‘Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision making’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 10, 51-55(1982).
103. Roubens, M., and Vincke, Ph., Preference Modelling, Berlin:Springer, 1985.
104. Roy, B., ‘Il faut désoptimiser la recherche opérationelle’, Bull. AFIRO 7 (1968a) extended Engl. transl. ‘The optimisation problem formulation: criticism and overstepping’, J. Oper. Res. Soc., 32, 427-436(1981).
105. Roy, B., ‘Classement et choix en présence de critères multiples (la méthode ELECTRE)', RIRO, 8, 57-75(1968b).
106. Roy, B., ‘Problems and methods with multiple objective functions’, Math. Program., 1, 239-266(1971).
107. Roy, B., ‘How outranking relations helps multiple criterion decision making’, in Cochrane, J. L. and Zeleny, M. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, 1973, pp. 179-201.
108. Roy, B., ‘Critères multiples et modélisation des préferences (l’apport des relations de surclassement)', Rev. Econ. Polit., 84, 1-44(1974).
109. Roy, B., ‘Vers une méthodologie générale d’aide à la décision’, Rev, METRA, XIV, 459-497(1975).
110. Roy, B., ‘From optimization to multicriteria decision aid: three main operational attitudes’, in Thiriez, H. and Zionts, S. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin:Springer, 1976, pp. 1-32.
111. Roy, B., ‘Partial preference analysis and decision-aid: the fuzzy outranking relation concept’, in Bell, D. E., Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (eds), Conflicting Objectives in Decisions, New York:Wiley, 1977, pp. 40-75.
112. Roy, B., ‘ELECTRE III: un algorithme de classements fondé sur une représenation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples’, Cah. Centre Etudes Rech. Opér., 20, 3-24(1978).
113. Roy, B., Méthodologie Multicritère d’Aide à la Décision, Paris:Economica, 1985;Engl. trans.Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1996.
114. Roy, B., ‘Meaning and validity of interactive procedures as tools for decision making’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 31, 297-303(1987).
115. Roy, B., ‘Main sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision in decision models’, Math. Comput. Model., 12, 1245-1254(1989).
116. Roy, B., ‘The outranking approach and the Foundations of ELECTRE methods’, in Bana e Costa, C. A. (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Berlin:Springer, 1990, pp. 155-183.
117. Roy, B., ‘Decision science or decision-aid science?', Eur. J. Oper. Res., 66, 184-203(1993).
118. Roy, B., and Bertier, P., ‘La méthode ELECTRE II-une application au média-planning’, in Ross, M. (ed.), OR '72, North Holland, 1973, pp. 291-302.
119. Roy, B., and Bouyssou, D., ‘Comparison of two decision-aid models applied to a nuclear plant siting example’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 25, 200-215(1986).
120. Roy, B., and Bouyssou, D., Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas, Paris:Economica, 1993.
121. Roy, B., and Hugonnard, J. C., ‘Ranking of surburban line extension projects on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method’, Transport. Res., 16A, 301-312(1982).
122. Roy, B., Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., and Blancher, M., ‘Elaboration de critères permettant une intégration des divers aspects liés au temps dans l’aide à la décision en matière de transports’, Metra Rep, 1977.
123. Roy, B., and Mousseau, V., ‘A theoretical framework for analysing the notion of relative importance of criteria’, J. Multi-Crit. Dec. Anal., in press(1995).
124. Roy, B., Présent, M., and Silhol, D., ‘A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24, 318-334(1986).
125. Roy, B., and Slowinski, R., ‘Criterion of distance between technical programming and socio-economic priority’, RAIRO Rech. Oper., 27, 45-60(1993).
126. Roy, B., and Vincke, Ph., ‘Relational systems of preference with one or more pseudo-criteria: some new concepts and results’, Manag. Sci., 30, 1323-1335(1984).
127. Roy, B., and Vincke, Ph., ‘Pseude-orders: definition, properties and numerical representation’, Math. Social Sci., 14, 234-281(1987).
128. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York:McGraw Hill, 1980.
129. Schärlig, A., Où Construire l’Usine? Localisation Optimale d’une Activité dans la Pratique, Paris:Dunod, 1973.
130. Schärlig, A., Décider sur Plusieurs Critères-Panorama de l’Aide à la Décision Multicritère, Lausanne:Presses Polytechniques Romandes, 1985.
131. Siskos, J., ‘Evaluating a system of furniture retail outlets using an interactive ordinal regression method’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 23, 179-193(1986).
132. Siskos, J., and Yannacopoulos, D., ‘UTASTAR, an ordinal regression method for building additive value functions’, Invest. Oper., 5, 39-53(1985).
133. Slowinski, R., ‘FLIP: an interactive method for multiobjective linear programming with fuzzy coefficients’, in Slowinski, R. and Teghem, J. (eds), Stochastic versus Fuzzy Approaches to Multiobjective Mathematical Programming under Uncertainty, Dordrecht:Kluwer, 1990, pp. 249-262.
134. Slowinski, R. (ed.), Intelligent Decision Support-Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1992.
135. Slowinski, R. and Teghem, J. (eds), Stochastic versus Fuzzy Approaches to Multiobjective Mathematical Programming under Uncertainty, Dordrecht:Kluwer, 1990.
136. Tanguy, Y., and Leclere, N., ‘Une application des méthodes de choix multi-critères à l’étude de l’adéquation des personnels aux postes de travail’, Actes du Congrès AFCET Aide à la Décision, 1974, pp. 139-147.
137. Teghem, J., ‘STRANGE: an interactive method for multiobjective stochastic linear programming and STRANGE-MOMIX its extension to integer variables’, in Slowinski, R. and Teghem, J. (eds), Stochastic versus Fuzzy Approaches to Multiobjective Mathematical Programming under Uncertainty, Dordrecht:Kluwer, 1990, pp. 103-115.
138. Tsoukiàs, A., and Vincke, Ph., ‘A survey on nonconventional preference modelling’, Ric. Oper., 61, 5-49(1992).
139. Tsoukiàs, A., and Vincke, Ph., ‘A new axiomatic foundation of partial comparability’, Theory and Decis., 39, 79-114, 1995.
140. Vanderpooten, D., ‘The interactive approach in MCDA: a technical framework and some basic conceptions’, Math. Comput. Model., 12, 1213-1220(1989).
141. Vanderpooten, D., ‘The construction of prescriptions in outranking methods’, in Bana e Costa, C. A. (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Berlin:Springer, 1990a, pp. 184-215.
142. Vanderpooten, D., ‘L’approche interactive dans l’aide multicritère à la décision: aspects conceptuels, méthodologiques et informatiques’, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine, 1990b.
143. Vanderpooten, D., ‘Three basic conceptions underlying multiple criteria interactive procedures’, in Goicoechea, A., Duckstein, L. and Zionts, S. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Berlin:Springer, 1992, pp. 441-448.
144. Vanderpooten, D., and Vincke, Ph., ‘Description and analysis of some representative interactive multicriteria procedures’, Math. Comput. Model., 12, 1221-1238(1989).
145. Vansnick, J. C., ‘On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach)', Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24, 288-294(1986).
146. Ventura, M., ‘Evry 1: concours d’aménagement urbain’, Cah. IAURP, 31, 1973.
147. Vincke, Ph., ‘Une méthode interactive en programmaétion linéaire à plusieurs fonctions économiques’, RAIRO Rech. Opér., 10, 5-20(1976).
148. Vincke, Ph., L’Aide Multicritère à la Décision, Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1989;Engl transl. Multicriteria Decision-Aid, Chichester:Wiley, 1992.
149. Vincke, Ph., ‘Exploitation of a crisp relation in a ranking problem’, Theory and Decis., 32, 221-249(1992).
150. Wierzbicki, A. P., ‘Multicriteria aid of intuition in decision making’, J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal.in press(1996).
151. Yu, W., ‘Aide multicritère à la décision dans le cadre de la problématique du tri: concepts, méthodes et applications’, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine, 1992.
152. Zimmerman, H. J., Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications, Boston, Kluwer, 1991.
153. Hofstede, G., Culture’s Consequences, International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage Publications, London, 1984.
154. Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Second edition, University of Chicago Press, 1971.
155. Trompenaars, F., Riding the Waves of Culture, Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business, Brealey, London, 1993.