The computational and neural basis of voluntary motor control and planning

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 541-549

  Scott, Stephen H ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEED-BACK CORRECTION; FEEDBACK PROCESS; MECHANICAL PERTURBATIONS; MOTOR CONTROL; OPTIMAL FEEDBACK CONTROL; OPTIMAL STATE ESTIMATION; VOLUNTARY CONTROLS;

OPTIMIZATION; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

PROCESS CONTROL;

BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBELLUM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LIMB MOVEMENT; MOTOR CONTROL; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NONHUMAN; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; PROPRIOCEPTIVE FEEDBACK; REVIEW; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SPINAL CORD; SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

BRAIN MAPPING; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOVEMENT; NEUROFEEDBACK; SENSATION;

EID: 84867919577     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.008     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Sherrington C.S. Flexion-reflex of the limb, crossed extension-reflex, and reflex stepping and standing. J. Physiol. 1910, 40:28-121.
2. Powers W.T. Living Control Systems III: The Fact of Control 2008, Benchmark Publications.
3. Scott S.H. Inconvenient truths about neural processing in primary motor cortex. J. Physiol. 2008, 586:1217-1224.
4. Franklin D.W., Wolpert D.M. Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron 2011, 72:425-442.
5. Todorov E., Jordan M.I. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:1226-1235.
6. Todorov E. Optimal control theory. Bayesian Brain: Probabilistic Approaches to Neural Coding 2006, 269-298. MIT Press. K. Doya (Ed.).
7. Faisal A.A., et al. Noise in the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:292-303.
8. Li W., Todorov E. Iterative linearization methods for approximately optimal control and estimation of non-linear stochastic systems. Int. J. Control 2007, 80:1439-1453.
9. Franklin D.W., Wolpert D.M. Specificity of reflex adaptation for task-relevant variability. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:14165-14175.
10. Nagengast A.J., et al. Optimal control predicts human performance on objects with internal degrees of freedom. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000419.
11. Valero-Cuevas F.J., et al. Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:59-68.
12. Stevenson I.H., et al. Bayesian integration and non-linear feedback control in a full-body motor task. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000629.
13. Dingwell J.B., et al. Do humans optimally exploit redundancy to control step variability in walking?. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000856.
14. Feldman A.G., Levin M.F. The equilibrium-point hypothesis--past, present and future. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2009, 629:699-726.
15. Loeb G.E. Optimal isn't good enough. Biol. Cybern. 2012, 10.1007/s00422-012-0514-6.
16. Friston K. What is optimal about motor control?. Neuron 2011, 72:488-498.
17. Hudson T.E., et al. Compensation for changing motor uncertainty. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 4:e1000982.
18. Kistemaker D.A., et al. The central nervous system does not minimize energy cost in arm movements. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 104:2985-2994.
19. De Rugy A., et al. Muscle coordination is habitual rather than optimal. J. Neurosci. 2012, 23:7384-7391.
20. Mohan V., Morasso P. Passive motion paradigm: an alternative to optimal control. Front. Neurobot. 2011, 5:4.
21. Scott S.H. Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5:534-546.
22. Pruszynski J.A., Scott S.H. Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 218:341-359.
23. Nashed J.Y., et al. Influence of the behavioural goal and environmental obstacles on rapid feedback responses. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:999-1009.
24. Cheng E.J., Loeb G.E. On the use of musculoskeletal models to interpret motor control strategies from performance data. J. Neural Eng. 2008, 5:232-253.
25. Knill D.C., et al. Flexible, task-dependent use of sensory feedback to control hand movements. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:1219-1237.
26. Diedrichsen J., et al. The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:31-39.
27. Diedrichsen J. Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1675-1679.
28. Diedrichsen J., Gush S. Reversal of bimanual feedback responses with changes in task goal. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101:283-288.
29. Dimitriou M., et al. Task-dependent coordination of rapid bimanual motor responses. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 107:890-901.
30. Mutha P.K., Sainburg R.L. Shared bimanual tasks elicit bimanual reflexes during movement. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:3142-3155.
31. Manning C.D., et al. Proprioceptive reaction times and long-latency reflexes in humans. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 221:155-166.
32. Sergio L.H., Scott S.H. Hand and joint paths during reaching movements with and without vision. Exp. Brain Res. 1998, 122:157-164.
33. Izawa J., et al. Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:2883-2891.
34. Pruszynski J.A., et al. Rapid motor responses are appropriately tuned to the metrics of a visuospatial task. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 100:224-238.
35. Pruszynski J.A., et al. The long-latency reflex is composed of at least two functionally independent processes. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 106:449-459.
36. Rossignol S., et al. Dynamic sensorimotor interactions in locomotion. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86:89-154.
37. Crevecoeur F., et al. Fast corrective responses are evoked by perturbations approaching the natural variability of posture and movement tasks. J. Neurosphysiol. 2012, 107:2821-2832.
38. Selen L.P.J., et al. Deliberation in the motor system: reflex gains track evolving evidence leading to a decision. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:2276-2286.
39. Mutha P.K., et al. Visual modulation of proprioceptive reflexes during movement. Brain Res. 2008, 1246:4-69.
40. Yang L., et al. Rapid motor responses quickly integrate visuospatial task constraints. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 211:231-242.
41. Wolpert D.M., Landy M.S. Motor control is decision-making. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2012, 10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.003.
42. Cisek P. Making decisions through a distributed consensus. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2012, 10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.007.
43. Gribble P.L., Ostry D.J. Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movements. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 82:2310-2326.
44. Kurtzer I.L., et al. Long-latency reflexes of the human arm reflect an internal model of limb dynamics. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:449-453.
45. Kurtzer I., et al. Long-latency responses during reaching account for the mechanical interaction between the shoulder and elbow joints. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:3004-3015.
46. Gritsenko V., et al. Integration of predictive feedforward and sensory feedback signals for online control of visually guided movement. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:914-930.
47. Cos I., et al. The influence of predicted arm biomechanics on decision making. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 105:3022-3033.
48. Shmeulof L., Krakauer J.W. Are we ready for a natural history of motor learning?. Neuron 2011, 72:469-476.
49. Burdet E., et al. The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 2001, 414:446-449.
50. Franklin D.W., et al. Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:7705-7716.
51. Wong J., et al. The influence of visual perturbations on the neural control of limb stiffness. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101:246-257.
52. Wang T., et al. Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses. Biol. Cybern. 2001, 85:437-448.
53. Wagner M.J., Smith M.A. Shared internal models for feedforward and feedback control. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:10663-10673.
54. Shemmell J., et al. The differential role of motor cortex in stretch reflex modulation induced by changes in environmental mechanics and verbal instruction. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:13255-13263.
55. Krutky M.A., et al. Interactions between limb and environmental mechanics influence stretch reflex sensitivity in the human arm. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:429-440.
56. Kimura T., et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation over sensorimotor cortex disrupts anticipatory reflex gain modulation for skilled action. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:9272-9281.
57. Kimura T., Gomi H. Temporal development of anticipatory reflex modulation to dynamical interactions during arm movement. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:2220-2231.
58. Ahmadi-Pajouh M.A., et al. Preparing to reach: selecting an adaptive long-latency feedback controller. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:9537-9545.
59. Scheidt R.A., et al. Interaction of visual and proprioceptive feedback during adaptation of human reaching movements. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 93:3200-3213.
60. Franklin S., et al. Visuomotor feedback gains upregulate during the learning of novel dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:467-478.
61. Stein P.S. Neuronal control of turtle hindlimb motor rhythms. J. Comp. Physiol. A 2005, 191:213-229.
62. Frigon A. Central pattern generators of the mammalian spinal cord. Neuroscientist 2012, 18:56-69.
63. Zehr E.P., Duysens J. Regulation of arm and leg movement during human locomotion. Neuroscientist 2004, 10:347-361.
64. Zehr E.P., et al. Neural control of rhythmic arm cycling after stroke. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:891-905.
65. Alstermark B., Isa T. Circuits for skilled reaching and grasping. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 35:559-5788.
66. Wolpaw J.R. What can the spinal cord teach us about learning and memory?. Neuroscientist 2010, 16:532-549.
67. Pruszynski J.A., et al. Temporal evolution of 'Automatic Gain-Scaling'. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102:992-1003.
68. Seki K., Fetz E.E. Gating of sensory input at spinal and cortical levels during preparation and execution of voluntary movement. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:890-902.
69. Kurtzer I., et al. Long-latency and voluntary responses to an arm displacement can be rapidly attenuated by perturbation offset. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:3195-3204.
70. Perreault E.J., et al. Interactions with compliant loads alter stretch reflex gains but not intermuscular coordination. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 99:2101-2113.
71. Pruszynski J.A., et al. Primary motor cortex underlies multi-joint integration for fast feedback control. Nature 2011, 478:387-390.
72. Hatsopoulos N.G., Suminski A.J. Sensing with the motor cortex. Neuron 2011, 72:477-487.
73. Evarts E.V., Tanji J. Reflex and intended responses in motor cortex pyramidal tract neurons of monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 1976, 39:1069-1080.
74. Herter T.M., et al. Comparison of neural responses in primary motor cortex to transient and continuous loads during posture. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101:150-163.
75. Kalaska J.F. From intention to action: motor cortex and the control of reaching movements. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2009, 629:139-178.
76. Herter T.M., et al. Characterization of torque-related activity in primary motor cortex during a multi-joint postural task. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97:2887-2899.
77. Suminski A.J., et al. Incorporating feedback from multiple sensory modalities enhances brainmachine interface control. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:16777-16787.
78. Churchland M.M., et al. Neural population dynamics during reaching. Nature 2012, 487:51-56.
79. Hantman A.W., Jessell T.M. Clarke's column neurons as the focus of a corticospinal corollary circuit. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13:1233-1239.
80. Shadmehr R., Krakauer J.W. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp. Brain Res. 2008, 185:359-381.
81. Strick P.L., et al. Cerebellum and nonmotor function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 32:413-434.
82. Bostan A.C., Strick P.L. The cerebellum and basal ganglia are interconnected. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2010, 20:261-270.
83. Prevosto V., et al. Cerebellar inputs to intraparietal cortex areas LIP and MIP: functional frameworks for adaptive control of eye movements, reaching, and arm/eye/head movement coordination. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:214-228.
84. Nichols T.R., Houk J.C. Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflexes. J. Neurophysiol. 1976, 39:119-142.
85. Cisek P., Kalaska J.F. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 33:269-298.
86. Porter R., Lemon R.N. Corticospinal Function and Voluntary Movement 1993, Oxford University Press.
87. Gritsenko V., Kalaska J.F. Rapid online correction is selectively suppressed during movement with a visuomotor transformation. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 104:3084-3104.
88. Takei T., Seki K. Spinal interneurons facilitate coactivation of hand muscles during a precision grip task in monkeys. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:17041-17050.
89. Shalit U., et al. Descending systems translate transient cortical commands into a sustained muscle activation signal. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 22:1904-1914.
90. Dimitriou M., Edin B.B. Human muscle spindles act as forward sensory models. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1763-1767.