The new technologies in knee arthroplasty

Journal of Clinical Rheumatology

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 345-348

  Higuera, Carlos A ^a   Deirmengian, Carl ^a,b  

^a ROTHMAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b LANKENAU INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84867786742     PISSN: 10761608     EISSN: 15367355     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3182724079     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, et al. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:213-217.
2. Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Thomas BS. Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2724-2729.
3. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, et al. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996:35-46. (Pubitemid 26357685)
4. Csintalan RP, Schulz MM, Woo J, et al. Gender differences in patellofemoral joint biomechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:260-269. (Pubitemid 35006599)
5. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, et al. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:262-267. (Pubitemid 30648930)
6. Greene KA. Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7 suppl 3):27-31. (Pubitemid 47494614)
7. Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A (suppl 4):115-122. (Pubitemid 37377433)
8. Mahoney OM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1115-1121.
9. Tanavalee A, Rojpornpradit T, Khumrak S, et al. The early results of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty in Thai patients. Knee. 2011;18:483-487.
10. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1911-1920.
11. Johnson AJ, Costa CR, Mont MA. Do we need gender-specific total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1852-1858.
12. Bae DK, Song SJ. Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011;3:259-267.
13. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143-2149.
14. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(suppl 2):90-98. (Pubitemid 35168340)
15. Kim YH, Kim JS, Choi Y, et al. Computer-assisted surgical navigation does not improve the alignment and orientation of the components in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:14-19.
16. Seon JK, Song EK, Park SJ, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without a navigation system. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:351-357.
17. Weng YJ, Hsu RW, Hsu WH. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:668-673.
18. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:261-269. (Pubitemid 46214342)
19. Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 suppl 3):132-138. (Pubitemid 41425797)
20. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1097-1106. (Pubitemid 350216994)
21. Pitto RP, Graydon AJ, Bradley L, et al. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:601-605. (Pubitemid 43772941)
22. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, et al. Leg axis after computernavigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:282-288. (Pubitemid 40460792)
23. Molfetta L, Caldo D. Computer navigation versus conventional implantation for varus knee total arthroplasty: a case-control study at 5 years follow-up. Knee. 2008;15:75-79.
24. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, et al. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:477-480. (Pubitemid 46851126)
25. Lonner JH, John TK, Conditt MA. Robotic arm-assisted UKA improves tibial component alignment: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:141-146.
26. Sinha RK. Outcomes of robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead, NJ). 2009;38(suppl 2):20-22.
27. Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, et al. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:188-197. (Pubitemid 43279929)
28. Park SE, Lee CT. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1054-1059. (Pubitemid 47498932)
29. Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, et al. Computer assisted total knee replacement: could a two-piece custom template replace the complex conventional instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg. 2004;9:93-94.
30. Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, et al. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:99-107.
31. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL, et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:889-894.
32. Watters TS, Mather RC 3rd, Browne JA, et al. Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011;20:112-116.