Do we need gender-specific total joint arthroplasty?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 469, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1852-1858

  Johnson, Aaron J ^a   Costa, Christopher R ^a   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 79959534961     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1769-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Aglietti P, Insall JN, Cerulli G. Patellar pain and incongruence. I. Measurements of incongruence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; 176:217-224.
2. Bachmann HS, Hanenkamp S, Kornacki B, Frey UH, Bau M, Siffert W, Wedemeyer C. Gender-dependent association of the GNAS1 T393C polymorphism with early aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1562-1568.
3. Bellemans J, Carpentier K, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J, Victor J. The John Insall Award. Both morphotype and gender influence the shape of the knee in patients undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:29-36.
4. Blaha JD, Mancinelli CA, Overgaard KA. Failure of sex to predict the size and shape of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 6):19-22.
5. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:128-133.
6. Bozic KJ, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ. Risk of complication and revision total hip arthroplasty among Medicare patients with different bearing surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:2357-2362.
7. Brinckmann P, Hoefert H, Jongen HT. Sex differences in the skeletal geometry of the human pelvis and hip joint. J Biomech. 1981;14:427-430.
8. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:740-747. (Pubitemid 32803640)
9. Chang HJ, Mehta PS, Rosenberg A, Scrimshaw SC. Concerns of patients actively contemplating total knee replacement: differences by race and gender. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:117-123. (Pubitemid 38222291)
10. Clarke HD, Hentz JG. Restoration of femoral anatomy in TKA with unisex and gender-specific components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2711-2716.
11. Csintalan RP, Schulz MM, Woo J, McMahon PJ, Lee TQ. Gender differences in patellofemoral joint biomechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;402:260-269. (Pubitemid 35006599)
12. Dargel J, Michael JW, Feiser J, Ivo R, Koebke J. Human knee joint anatomy revisited: morphometry in the light of sex-specific total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010 March 3 [Epub ahead of print].
13. Ding C, Cicuttini F, Blizzard L, Scott F, Jones G. A longitudinal study of the effect of sex and age on rate of change in knee cartilage volume in adults. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007;46:273-279. (Pubitemid 46189788)
14. Ding C, Cicuttini F, Scott F, Glisson M, Jones G. Sex differences in knee cartilage volume in adults: role of body and bone size, age and physical activity. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42:1317-1323. (Pubitemid 37407023)
15. Eckstein F, Siedek V, Glaser C, Al-Ali D, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Graichen H. Correlation and sex differences between ankle and knee cartilage morphology determined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1490-1495. (Pubitemid 39433956)
16. Emerson RH Jr, Martinez J. Men versus women: does size matter in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2706-2710.
17. Faber SC, Eckstein F, Lukasz S, Muhlbauer R, Hohe J, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Gender differences in knee joint cartilage thickness, volume and articular surface areas: assessment with quantitative three-dimensional MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30:144-150. (Pubitemid 32288158)
18. Fehring TK, Odum SM, Hughes J, Springer BD, Beaver WB Jr. Differences between the sexes in the anatomy of the anterior condyle of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2335-2341.
19. Grelsamer RP, Dubey A, Weinstein CH. Men and women have similar Q angles: a clinical and trigonometric evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1498-1501.
20. Guerra JP, Arnold MJ, Gajdosik RL. Q angle: effects of isometric quadriceps contraction and body position. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994;19:200-204. (Pubitemid 24090052)
21. Hanna FS, Bell RJ, Cicuttini FM, Davison SL, Wluka AE, Davis SR. The relationship between endogenous testosterone, preandrogens, and sex hormone binding globulin and knee joint structure in women at midlife. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007;37:56-62. (Pubitemid 47096650)
22. Hanna FS, Teichtahl AJ, Wluka AE, Wang Y, Urquhart DM, English DR, Giles GG, Cicuttini FM. Women have increased rates of cartilage loss and progression of cartilage defects at the knee than men: a gender study of adults without clinical knee osteoarthritis. Menopause. 2009;16:666-670.
23. Hernborg J, Nilsson BE. Age and sex incidence of osteophytes in the knee joint. Acta Orthop Scand. 1973;44:66-68.
24. Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, McCarthy J, Moskal J, Hoeman T, Mont MA. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 4):115-122. (Pubitemid 37377433)
25. Holtzman J, Saleh K, Kane R. Gender differences in functional status and pain in a Medicare population undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Med Care. 2002;40:461-470.
26. Horton MG, Hall TL. Quadriceps femoris muscle angle: normal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures. Phys Ther. 1989;69:897-901.
27. Hsu RW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EY. Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;255:215-227. (Pubitemid 20187451)
28. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN. Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med. 1997;102:524-530. (Pubitemid 27305114)
29. Kennedy DM, Hanna SE, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD. Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:559-566. (Pubitemid 43866399)
30. Kersnic B, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V, Jaklic A, Srakar F, Pernus F, Antolic V. Determination of the femoral and pelvic geometrical parameters that are important for the hip joint contact stress: differences between female and male. Pflugers Arch. 1996; 431(6 Suppl 2):R207-R208. (Pubitemid 26140962)
31. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1911-1920.
32. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Comparison of standard and gender-specific posterior-cruciate-retaining high-flexion total knee replacements: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:639-645.
33. Kostamo T, Bourne RB, Whittaker JP, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ. No difference in gender-specific hip replacement outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:135-140.
34. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780-785.
35. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Zhao K, Mowat F, Lau E. Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:195-203.
36. Lavernia CJ, Alcerro JC, Contreras JS, Rossi MD. Patient Perceived Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroplasty: Does Gender Matter? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 August 11 [Epub ahead of print].
37. Mahoney OM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1115-1121.
38. Mall G, Graw M, Gehring K, Hubig M. Determination of sex from femora. Forensic Sci Int. 2000;113:315-321. (Pubitemid 30649753)
39. Ong KL, Lau E, Suggs J, Kurtz SM, Manley MT. Risk of subsequent revision after primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3070-3076.
40. Petterson SC, Raisis L, Bodenstab A, Snyder-Mackler L. Disease-specific gender differences among total knee arthroplasty candidates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2327-2333. (Pubitemid 350086320)
41. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:35-46. (Pubitemid 26357685)
42. Purkait R. Sex determination from femoral head measurements: a new approach. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2003;5(Suppl 1):S347-S350. (Pubitemid 36537907)
43. Purkait R. Triangle identified at the proximal end of femur: a new sex determinant. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147:135-139. (Pubitemid 39572949)
44. Suda AJ, Seeger JB, Bitsch RG, Krueger M, Clarius M. Are patients' expectations of hip and knee arthroplasty fulfilled? A prospective study of 130 patients. Orthopedics. 2010;33:76-80.
45. Tanavalee A, Rojpornpradit T, Khumrak S, Ngarmukos S. The early results of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty in Thai patients. Knee. 2010 October 30 [Epub ahead of print].
46. Traina F, De Clerico M, Biondi F, Pilla F, Tassinari E, Toni A. Sex differences in hip morphology: is stem modularity effective for total hip replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 6):121-128.
47. van der Esch M, Steultjens MP, Lems WF, Dekker J. Gender difference in varus-valgus laxity in osteoarthritis of the knee. Scand J Rheumatol. 2007;36:157-159. (Pubitemid 46685763)
48. Wheatley BP. An evaluation of sex and body weight determination from the proximal femur using DXA technology and its potential for forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147:141-145. (Pubitemid 39572950)
49. Whittle J, Steinberg EP, Anderson GF, Herbert R, Hochberg MC. Mortality after elective total hip arthroplasty in elderly Americans: age, gender, and indication for surgery predict survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;295:119-126. (Pubitemid 23299638)
50. Woodland LH, Francis RS. Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:208-211.
51. Yates LB, Karasik D, Beck TJ, Cupples LA, Kiel DP. Hip structural geometry in old and old-old age: similarities and differences between men and women. Bone. 2007;41:722-732. (Pubitemid 47393665)